Hi Username1512,Good catch on reading the fee carefully, but the wording actually settles this in the provider's favor.
Look at the exact phrase:
"unlimited data traffic which costs $0.5 per day charged off at 12 a.m." Two clues make this a flat daily subscription, not a usage-based charge:
-
"Unlimited" - you're not paying per gigabyte or per session. You pay one fixed price for the
right to use as much as you want. That right exists whether you use it or not.
-
"$0.5 per day charged off at 12 a.m." - the deduction happens automatically each day at a set time. Nothing in it is tied to whether Bob went online.
So the
$0.5 is like a daily rental: it comes out every midnight regardless of usage. That's why the daily balance drops by exactly
$0.5 each day, period.
Why this makes the statements behave as they doOnce you accept that usage doesn't matter, Statement (
1) - "didn't use it for two consecutive days" - changes
nothing about the balance, so it can't help count the days.
Not sufficient.To see that usage truly doesn't affect the count, test it against Statement (
2) (initial balance
$0, so
$14 after payment):
-
Bob uses the internet every day - charged
$0.5 daily, stays connected until debt would exceed
$10.
-
Bob skips several days - still charged
$0.5 daily, disconnects at the
exact same point.
Both cases land on the
same number of connected days. Since the answer never shifts, the usage information is irrelevant and Statement (
2) alone pins it down. That's the whole reason the answer is
B.
So you didn't misread - you just applied a per-use model to what the problem defines as a flat, automatic daily charge. The word
"unlimited" is the tell.
Answer: BUsername1512
Where does it say that the daily quota will be deducted irrespective of usage? I took that into consideration when answering the question.