Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 15:36 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 15:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
spinoza
Joined: 12 Feb 2011
Last visit: 12 Jun 2016
Posts: 41
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 41
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
alexBLR
Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Last visit: 19 Jan 2018
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.78
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
thelagtag
Joined: 04 Nov 2011
Last visit: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GPA: 3.52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
dsg
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Last visit: 14 Feb 2013
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GMAT 1: 680 Q45 V38
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.51
WE:Corporate Finance (Other)
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 48
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thelagtag
Does anyone what percentage of students get accepted from the pool of people who have received interviews?

Thanks!

I don't know for sure, and I'm taking this from what I read earlier in this thread, but Booth typically takes 40% - 50% of the applicants it interviews.
avatar
BStand
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Last visit: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 117
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
Posts: 117
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dsg
thelagtag
Does anyone what percentage of students get accepted from the pool of people who have received interviews?

Thanks!

I don't know for sure, and I'm taking this from what I read earlier in this thread, but Booth typically takes 40% - 50% of the applicants it interviews.

Yeah, that sounds right. It also seems like their yield has been steadily increasing, so Booth may end having to either interview a smaller % of the total pool, or accept a smaller % of the interviewed pool in order to reach their target class size.
User avatar
PTK
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Last visit: 06 Oct 2022
Posts: 1,135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 622
Status:mission completed!
GPA: 3.77
Products:
Posts: 1,135
Kudos: 2,218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guys may I am speculating but, as far as as I know Wharton last year accepted about 45% ladies to their class. So I would not wonder if this “fashion” would be repeated by other top schools this year.
I saw a girl enrolled to this thread (with the GMAT 650 and IB experience) , she got an invite from Booth few days before.
I respect women and my post is in no way to hurt or somehow or diminish the women’s aspirations.
Just 2 cents.
avatar
BStand
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Last visit: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 117
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
Posts: 117
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PTK
Guys may I am speculating but, as far as as I know Wharton last year accepted about 45% ladies to their class. So I would not wonder if this “fashion” would be repeated by other top schools this year.
I saw a girl enrolled to this thread (with the GMAT 650 and IB experience) , she got an invite from Booth few days before.
I respect women and my post is in no way to hurt or somehow or diminish the women’s aspirations.
Just 2 cents.

I'm not sure what you're implying, but I think the point is that MBA programs are seeking to have more gender diversity in the class than in past years.

Booth is on record as saying that 30% of the class is the threshold where a group has a strong sense of identity on campus. And I believe Booth is approx. 35% women. So, yes, I'd expect women to be at that level or even higher going forward.

The stat I'm referencing can be found here: https://poetsandquants.com/2011/02/14/wh ... o-booth/3/
User avatar
ShivKaul
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Last visit: 25 Dec 2012
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Affiliations: War veteran & gallantry award winner.
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.81
WE:Other (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 111
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@ PTK

Look at it this way. Even if they take 45% females this year, that still leaves 55% of the slots open for men. It is not the ladies' or the school's problem that the no. of men who apply to B-Schools are way more than the ladies! :)

But yes, I agree that most top schools may end up having a 35%-40% range wrt their female applicant pool this year, keeping in line with their intention of increasing the gender equality in their respective schools.

Cya
User avatar
dalillama
Joined: 28 May 2010
Last visit: 25 Dec 2016
Posts: 156
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q41 V46
GMAT 2: 740 Q47 V45
GPA: 3
GMAT 2: 740 Q47 V45
Posts: 156
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dsg
thelagtag
Does anyone what percentage of students get accepted from the pool of people who have received interviews?

Thanks!

I don't know for sure, and I'm taking this from what I read earlier in this thread, but Booth typically takes 40% - 50% of the applicants it interviews.

This is correct. About half of applicants are interviewed, and about 40-50% of those interviewed are admitted.
User avatar
PTK
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Last visit: 06 Oct 2022
Posts: 1,135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 622
Status:mission completed!
GPA: 3.77
Products:
Posts: 1,135
Kudos: 2,218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tgtivyleague
@ PTK

Look at it this way. Even if they take 45% females this year, that still leaves 55% of the slots open for men. It is not the ladies' or the school's problem that the no. of men who apply to B-Schools are way more than the ladies! :)

But yes, I agree that most top schools may end up having a 35%-40% range wrt their female applicant pool this year, keeping in line with their intention of increasing the gender equality in their respective schools.

Cya

This is an assumption I used to arrive to a possible explanation/reason of why Booth dinged dinged today so many people ( I assumed guys).
65% of slots for men last year or 55% slots this year, makes a signigicant difference when it comes to assumed comparison of % admition rates separately for men and women. (way to many assumption I am making today after the Booth's ding).

Overall I belive that this tendency to equate the men/women ratio should not be so sharp at it was last year at Wharton. Such changes must takes years of smooth transition.
User avatar
ShivKaul
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Last visit: 25 Dec 2012
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Affiliations: War veteran & gallantry award winner.
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.81
WE:Other (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 111
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think they have given out mostly dings today. Quite surprising, given that they gave very few invites yesterday!

If I am not wrong, only ONE member has reported an invite so far today. Has everyone received their intimation? Or is the afternoon wave still remaining?
avatar
ls413
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Last visit: 20 Apr 2013
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
17
 [3]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
Posts: 132
Kudos: 17
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PTK
tgtivyleague
@ PTK

Look at it this way. Even if they take 45% females this year, that still leaves 55% of the slots open for men. It is not the ladies' or the school's problem that the no. of men who apply to B-Schools are way more than the ladies! :)

But yes, I agree that most top schools may end up having a 35%-40% range wrt their female applicant pool this year, keeping in line with their intention of increasing the gender equality in their respective schools.

Cya

This is an assumption I used to arrive to a possible explanation/reason of why Booth dinged dinged today so many people ( I assumed guys).
65% of slots for men last year or 55% slots this year, makes a signigicant difference when it comes to assumed comparison of % admition rates separately for men and women. (way to many assumption I am making today after the Booth's ding).

Overall I belive that this tendency to equate the men/women ratio should not be so sharp at it was last year at Wharton. Such changes must takes years of smooth transition.

I think we are missing a critical piece of the puzzle here. We really cannot just look at people's GMAT scores and GPAs and say that this person should have gotten in or this other person should not have. I also don't think this is about gender either. I do not believe a school would admit someone on the sole basis of gender if that applicant was not qualified for the program.

B-school applications are a holistic process. Essays matter A LOT. They want people who are different and who can round out the class. So, if you're in finance or consulting, for example, you're competing with the thousands of other people who are also in those industries. In the end, it's going to be about how you stand out, what it is that makes your application "sparkle" (to quote Kurt Ahlm), and what kind of contribution you can make to the class.
avatar
kethee
Joined: 20 Jul 2011
Last visit: 17 Apr 2012
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Technology
GPA: 3.5
WE:Investment Banking (Finance: Investment Banking)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ls413


I think we are missing a critical piece of the puzzle here. We really cannot just look at people's GMAT scores and GPAs and say that this person should have gotten in or this other person should not have. I also don't think this is about gender either. I do not believe a school would admit someone on the sole basis of gender if that applicant was not qualified for the program.

B-school applications are a holistic process. Essays matter A LOT. They want people who are different and who can round out the class. So, if you're in finance or consulting, for example, you're competing with the thousands of other people who are also in those industries. In the end, it's going to be about how you stand out, what it is that makes your application "sparkle" (to quote Kurt Ahlm), and what kind of contribution you can make to the class.

+1
avatar
goodbyeboy
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Last visit: 21 Jan 2024
Posts: 154
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Products:
Posts: 154
Kudos: 46
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ls413
PTK
tgtivyleague
@ PTK

Look at it this way. Even if they take 45% females this year, that still leaves 55% of the slots open for men. It is not the ladies' or the school's problem that the no. of men who apply to B-Schools are way more than the ladies! :)

But yes, I agree that most top schools may end up having a 35%-40% range wrt their female applicant pool this year, keeping in line with their intention of increasing the gender equality in their respective schools.

Cya

This is an assumption I used to arrive to a possible explanation/reason of why Booth dinged dinged today so many people ( I assumed guys).
65% of slots for men last year or 55% slots this year, makes a signigicant difference when it comes to assumed comparison of % admition rates separately for men and women. (way to many assumption I am making today after the Booth's ding).

Overall I belive that this tendency to equate the men/women ratio should not be so sharp at it was last year at Wharton. Such changes must takes years of smooth transition.

I think we are missing a critical piece of the puzzle here. We really cannot just look at people's GMAT scores and GPAs and say that this person should have gotten in or this other person should not have. I also don't think this is about gender either. I do not believe a school would admit someone on the sole basis of gender if that applicant was not qualified for the program.

B-school applications are a holistic process. Essays matter A LOT. They want people who are different and who can round out the class. So, if you're in finance or consulting, for example, you're competing with the thousands of other people who are also in those industries. In the end, it's going to be about how you stand out, what it is that makes your application "sparkle" (to quote Kurt Ahlm), and what kind of contribution you can make to the class.

Sorry to disagree with you, but you CANNOT possibly say that gender or race doesn't play a role when it comes to decisions, and I am not saying this to disrespect female applicants or minority applicants. Some undergrad schools, especially in the west coast where they have overwhelmingly many Asian applicants, flat out say that they limit their pool and look more fondly to other minority students. It makes sense for the school, but for applicants who happen to come from those "common" background - it surely works as disadvantages. I am 100% sure this is the case for business schools as well.

Also, the problem with those terms, such as "holistic process" or "sparkle" are extremely vague terms that don't really mean anything. How much time do you think is spent on adcom's side to take a "holistic" approach to find "sparkles" on each applicant? I am 100% positive that it's merely a fraction of how much time and work applicants spend on their application, not including the time they spend on nervously waiting for their decisions for weeks, sometimes for months since the summer. Yes they get thousands of applications and have a little time - but I really wish that people and school would stop giving out such vague terms. It really doesn't mean much to applicants, whether they're accepted or rejected.

I don't think we are missing any puzzles here. We all know about the weight of GMAT score, GPA etc. GMAT community is a lot smarter than that. Some got dinged not because they don't have "sparkles", aren't unique, or their essays were bad, it's because Booth also "failed" to find the "sparkles". It's alway a two way street. Some schools find them, and some don't. We move on. The end.
User avatar
scorpionz
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Last visit: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 388
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41
WE:Project Management (Computer Software)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41
Posts: 388
Kudos: 140
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ls413

I think we are missing a critical piece of the puzzle here. We really cannot just look at people's GMAT scores and GPAs and say that this person should have gotten in or this other person should not have. I also don't think this is about gender either. I do not believe a school would admit someone on the sole basis of gender if that applicant was not qualified for the program.

B-school applications are a holistic process. Essays matter A LOT. They want people who are different and who can round out the class. So, if you're in finance or consulting, for example, you're competing with the thousands of other people who are also in those industries. In the end, it's going to be about how you stand out, what it is that makes your application "sparkle" (to quote Kurt Ahlm), and what kind of contribution you can make to the class.

+1
User avatar
MBADreams_2012
Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Last visit: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Products:
Posts: 4
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MBADreams_2012
Dinged

Indian/710/5+ years IB-Distressed/29/clueless !!!!


Guys,

Want an opinion...is 710 on the lower side esp. considering the average GMAT of candidates called for interviews, I think its in range of 720-730...

Shud I give it again before i resume battle in R2??

Thanks & Regards
avatar
time4gmat
Joined: 10 Nov 2011
Last visit: 23 Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
Status:R1 no calls.. Wondering where to apply in R2..
Location: Singapore
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.71
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dinged.. First from a US B-school ever..
avatar
tlbkcal
Joined: 29 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 May 2013
Posts: 117
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Location: United States (CA)
City: San Francisco
Concentration: Finance, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 117
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MBADreams_2012
MBADreams_2012
Dinged

Indian/710/5+ years IB-Distressed/29/clueless !!!!


Guys,

Want an opinion...is 710 on the lower side esp. considering the average GMAT of candidates called for interviews, I think its in range of 720-730...

Shud I give it again before i resume battle in R2??

Thanks & Regards

I think 710 is a pretty good score and isn't too different from 720 or even 730. Unless you feel you can get the score up to 750+, I'd take the time you would have spent restudying for gmat to polish up essays and app.
avatar
friasgzz
Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Last visit: 20 Dec 2012
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Mexico
WE:Marketing (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Posts: 15
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MBADreams_2012, I believe 710 is good enough! I scored 690 and have a 3.1 GPA and got an interview. I believe whenever they see a GMAT score above 700 they know you are smart enough and go looking for what else you have to offer on your application.

That worked for me! So that is my opinion!

Good luck!
avatar
dsg
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Last visit: 14 Feb 2013
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GMAT 1: 680 Q45 V38
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.51
WE:Corporate Finance (Other)
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 48
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MBADreams_2012
MBADreams_2012
Dinged

Indian/710/5+ years IB-Distressed/29/clueless !!!!


Guys,

Want an opinion...is 710 on the lower side esp. considering the average GMAT of candidates called for interviews, I think its in range of 720-730...

Shud I give it again before i resume battle in R2??

Thanks & Regards

Your 710 is above the 80th percentile in both Q & V, so I wouldn't worry about retaking it. Like everyone else is saying, take the time to perfect and polish those essays.
   1  ...  34   35   36   37   38  ...  117   
Moderator:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts