More on why I think rankings ALONE doesn't do it. 2010 FT rankings
https://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolra ... a-rankings has the Indian School of business at #12, higher than Stern(13), Tuck (13), Yale (16), Oxford (16), Fuqua (20), Kellogg (22!!!!), Darden (31), Cornell (36), Olin (49), Kelley (57!!!!!, OK, this one was personal cuz I really like the Kelley program
).
Anyways, my point is that --with no insult intended to anyone of Indian heritage here -- there is NO WAY folks forgo the Stern, Oxford, Kellogg etc programs for the Indian School of business MBA. Why is it ranked @ # 12? So the parameters of ranking sometimes, again..... sometimes..... is not reflective of true value. Personally, I think the BW ranking are more accurate....
But Evergreen please help us out here with other strengths of the Olin program...(see my previous post this AM)
Oh btw, I agree with hypermeganet comment: "I was admitted here and I'm trying to see if they are in the running, so I'm not trying to trash the school. Just being analytical about my investment". Same here. No one is trying to trash Olin. We are lucky enough (or worked our butts off) to have the privilege of making a choice between top schools so thatz the whole point of this exercise....