Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 11:12 |
It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 11:12 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
17 Dec 2008, 06:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
ac8706
I agree, and lets get back to our regularly scheduled program.
17 Dec 2008, 07:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hope today is a big day for the club! Since yesterday was pretty much lost it seems to calls, hopefully today will be better!
Best of luck everyone!
Best of luck everyone!
17 Dec 2008, 08:28
Kudos
Bookmarks
Just one final thought on this whole fiasco. I've worked in fundraising for a few years, and I can't count the number of times I've sent out letters with someone elses name on it.
The point is, every single time we do that, we get explicit approval from the person whose name is on the letter with regard to the content and the recipients of whatever we're sending. That way, any mistakes are on them. To allow your name to be put on something that you're not sure who its going to is irresponsible. Regardless of who sent the email, Beth's name is on it so she is responsible. Allowing some IT flunky (if we're assuming that's what happened) to send out important emails with your name on it, with no checks and balances is poor management.
But on the other hand, she seems to be handling it with all the class in the world. I think the fact that she is personally calling people to let them know is exactly what she should be doing. She screwed up, and she is taking responsibility for it. And I bet they're making sure this never happens again. We've all screwed up before, so try and have a little empathy.
That's just my two cents. I'd hate to be in the position of people who are involved in the mixup. I'm still waiting.
The point is, every single time we do that, we get explicit approval from the person whose name is on the letter with regard to the content and the recipients of whatever we're sending. That way, any mistakes are on them. To allow your name to be put on something that you're not sure who its going to is irresponsible. Regardless of who sent the email, Beth's name is on it so she is responsible. Allowing some IT flunky (if we're assuming that's what happened) to send out important emails with your name on it, with no checks and balances is poor management.
But on the other hand, she seems to be handling it with all the class in the world. I think the fact that she is personally calling people to let them know is exactly what she should be doing. She screwed up, and she is taking responsibility for it. And I bet they're making sure this never happens again. We've all screwed up before, so try and have a little empathy.
That's just my two cents. I'd hate to be in the position of people who are involved in the mixup. I'm still waiting.
