SikiminBashi wrote:
4 out of 5 of their applicants get rejected during normal times. I wonder if that number is lower or higher now with everything going on
Here's my clinical answer.
I can only assume that (i) they got a bajillion re-applicants when they re-opened applications to those who were denied R1 and R2, and (ii) they got a bajillion more when they said the were giving GMAT waivers.
I would assume the % admitted is much lower. Yet, I would assume they're managing current / future admits this year to protect their yield. I would suspect they're doing something like what follows below:
I'm assuming that, now, they're giving everyone a very (!) quick glance to see if there is anything (GPA / UG school, GMAT, former / current employers, former / current roles (or production / performance), or other graduate degrees (i.e., they already have their JD) that would make them really stand out ... then, they glance quickly through the application package ... and, if they stood out in a good way -- and -- articulated their story well ... then, these people are given an interview.
If they don't soil themselves in the interview, they get strong consideration for an offer ... and their application gets read by many prior to a decision.
Then, from this group, offers are extended and some are accepted ... and some declined. For each one that's accepted, the number of admits in the next iteration is reduced by two.
Rinse.
Repeat.
Until the class is full.
So, anyone who doesn't pretty quickly rise above the half-way mark is being put on hold (at least for the time being) ... so ... (unfortunately) if your application has been in for a while and you've not heard anything, while I'd wish for different for you, I would assume you should not wait around too long on Kellogg.
If you've relatively recently sent your stuff in, you may have been set aside like those who've had their stuff in for a while ... or ... they've just not gotten to you yet (again, I'm assuming there are two bajillion new applications to wade through).
You may have an AWESOME story, and good measurables ... but, maybe they way you told your story just didn't resonate with the adcom who read it. It doesn't take away from the quality of your background or the awesome things you will accomplish in the future.
This whole
MBA admit process is a very (!!!) inexact science. It's horribly emotional for everyone (including adcom members, I assume). Hold your head up high and understand some committee somewhere doesn't dictate your worth -- just whether or not you have a chance to go to their school ... and remember, there are a nearly infinite number of successful people who never attended their employer.