pmayer
Typically, I think a lot of people are better off not sending optional essays... Meaning, I was under the impression that they are to be used for very brief notes on things that NEED to be explained that would seem unusual about the rest of the application without context.
I applied to quite a few schools and think I may have made a mistake by not sending additional video/essay content for Booth/Sloan. Did anyone else just submit the two essays for Sloan with a very brief third essay?
I'm the same - I always approached the optional essay as a place to explain grade hiccups or any other shortcomings...and not an avenue to a whole new branch of my application. I think it's a bit unfair if people use the optional essay "too much" and I do hope schools recognize this. If schools really are seeking ways for applicants to stand out apart from the usual essays and resumes, I would much prefer they ask for something like Kellogg's video essay. That way everyone is on a regulated, even playing field but still get to show some personality.
Bottom line - I think it would be unfair if schools hinged a decision based on an unregulated, unstructured, unguided part of their application. I hope they feel the same way.
I had a similar general understanding of optional essays (used to explain potential shortcomings), but the admissions director during an MIT info session mentioned that Sloan's optional essay was meant to show off a otherwise unexplained part of your candidacy. That said, he did mention that not all candidates choose to write the essay. I also remember he estimated the essay helps about 50% of those who submit one and is neutral for 40% (which leaves ~10% for which the optional essay shows a lack of judgement or is otherwise harmful).