It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 11:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 410 [0], given: 172

GPA: 3.46
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2013, 23:19
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (01:52) correct 41% (02:18) wrong based on 322 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalities per capita than is the neighboring province of Cheviraul. Nonetheless, the number of collisions per capita that result in whiplash injuries is less than half those per capita of neighboring Cheviraul. While such a finding implies that accidents occurring in Cheviraul are more likely to result in whiplash, there is another fact that should not be overlooked: unlike insurance providers in Cheviraul, those in Carvania do not pay premiums for automobile accident-related whiplash. Because many incidents of whiplash apparently go unreported in Carvania, the actual number of incidents of whiplash in Carvania may be equal to, if not more than, the number of whiplash incidents in Cheviraul.

In the argument given above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a claim that challenges the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
B. The first is a judgment made by the argument about a certain explanation; the second is that explanation.
C. The first is an observation that calls into question an observed phenomenon; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a claim that the argument sets out to prove; the second limits the extent of this claim.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion; the second is the primary conclusion.

Will post OA after few answers along with the explanations.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by mba1382 on 28 Dec 2013, 08:52, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 410 [0], given: 172

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3381

Kudos [?]: 9311 [1], given: 1169

Re: Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2013, 04:10
1
KUDOS
Tough one.

Aside 2 choices the others are really close.

But if you look at the part in beetwen the bold part we have a finding or an observation that a phenomenon could be different.

I go with C

regards
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9311 [1], given: 1169

Manager
Status: Work hard in silence, let success make the noise
Joined: 25 Nov 2013
Posts: 157

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 84

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 540 Q50 V15
GMAT 2: 640 Q50 V27
GPA: 3.11
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2013, 07:11
I was able to eliminate B,D and E and was stuck between A and C.
Finally, I marked C.

_________________

Sahil Chaudhary
If you find this post helpful, please take a moment to click on the "+1 KUDOS" icon.
My IELTS 7.5 Experience
From 540 to 640...Done with GMAT!!!
http://www.sahilchaudhary007.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 84

Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 3 [2], given: 6

GMAT 1: 650 Q51 V29
Re: Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2013, 07:15
2
KUDOS
A. The first is a claim that challenges the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion: incorrect. The first isn't a claim.
B. The first is a judgment made by the argument about a certain explanation; the second is that explanation: incorrect. The first isn't a judgment about the second. Moreover, the second isn't the explanation.
C. The first is an observation that calls into question an observed phenomenon; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. Correct. An observed phenomenon is whether accidents occurring in Cheviraul are more likely to result in whiplash.
D. The first is a claim that the argument sets out to prove; the second limits the extent of this claim. incorrect. The same as A. The first isn't a claim.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion; the second is the primary conclusion. incorrect. The first isn't an intermediate conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 3 [2], given: 6

Intern
Joined: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 28

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 80

Re: Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2014, 03:37
mba1382 wrote:
Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalities per capita than is the neighboring province of Cheviraul. Nonetheless, the number of collisions per capita that result in whiplash injuries is less than half those per capita of neighboring Cheviraul. While such a finding implies that accidents occurring in Cheviraul are more likely to result in whiplash, there is another fact that should not be overlooked: unlike insurance providers in Cheviraul, those in Carvania do not pay premiums for automobile accident-related whiplash. Because many incidents of whiplash apparently go unreported in Carvania, the actual number of incidents of whiplash in Carvania may be equal to, if not more than, the number of whiplash incidents in Cheviraul.

In the argument given above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a claim that challenges the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
B. The first is a judgment made by the argument about a certain explanation; the second is that explanation.
C. The first is an observation that calls into question an observed phenomenon; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a claim that the argument sets out to prove; the second limits the extent of this claim.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion; the second is the primary conclusion.

Will post OA after few answers along with the explanations.

First identify the main conclusion of the argument. "Because" is the premise indicator, so the sentence after the premise, MUST be the conclusion. Hence second boldface is the conclusion.

Based on this, we can eliminate D and E.
A - first boldface does NOT challenge the main conclusion - OUT
B - first bold face is not a judgement about the main conclusion - OUT.
C - correct.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 80

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10132

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2016, 23:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 25

Re: Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2016, 23:05
mba1382 wrote:
Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalities per capita than is the neighboring province of Cheviraul. Nonetheless, the number of collisions per capita that result in whiplash injuries is less than half those per capita of neighboring Cheviraul. While such a finding implies that accidents occurring in Cheviraul are more likely to result in whiplash, there is another fact that should not be overlooked: unlike insurance providers in Cheviraul, those in Carvania do not pay premiums for automobile accident-related whiplash. Because many incidents of whiplash apparently go unreported in Carvania, the actual number of incidents of whiplash in Carvania may be equal to, if not more than, the number of whiplash incidents in Cheviraul.

In the argument given above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a claim that challenges the main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion.
B. The first is a judgment made by the argument about a certain explanation; the second is that explanation.
C. The first is an observation that calls into question an observed phenomenon; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a claim that the argument sets out to prove; the second limits the extent of this claim.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion; the second is the primary conclusion.

Will post OA after few answers along with the explanations.

A. The first is not a claim. It is not a subjective statement. So A is out
B. Again judgment becomes subjective which the statement is not. B is out.
C. Yes. The first boldface statement is an statistical observation that calls into question the previous observation made about per capita auto fatalities. Based on these two, the second boldface statement is the conclusion.
D. Again not a claim. D is out
E. The first is not a conclusion. It is like a precursor to a conclusion. E is out.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 25

Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2680

Kudos [?]: 437 [1], given: 200

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2017, 15:12
1
KUDOS
the first one is definitely a premise/data point/fact.
just by looking at the role of the first statement, we can eliminate all but C.

Kudos [?]: 437 [1], given: 200

VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1082

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 541

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2017, 02:41
IMO C
Observed phenomenon is that Carvania has more no of automobile accidents than Cheviraul. We are then provided an observation a particular type of accidents that is surprising .We are given facts for this discrepancy of whiplash injuries that establishes why was this discrepancy there .
Last statement gives Conclusion of the argument .
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 541

Re: Carvania is known to have a greater number of auto fatalitie   [#permalink] 29 Apr 2017, 02:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by