Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:44 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:44
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
Sub 505 Level|   Grammatical/Rhetorical Construction|                     
User avatar
ali267
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2021
Last visit: 01 Feb 2023
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 16
Kudos: 1
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 21 Sep 2021, 10:05
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain what is wrong with A.
User avatar
Sneha2021
User avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 314
Own Kudos:
38
Given Kudos: 522
Location: India
Posts: 314
Kudos: 38
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 18 Nov 2021, 01:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
In A, I agree that if we remove modifier "in confining...walkers", sentence seems incomplete.
Does A communicate illogical meaning?
What's the meaning difference between In confining vs confining (A vs C)?

(A) that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [1]
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 18 Nov 2021, 02:19
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
Hi Experts,
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
In A, I agree that if we remove modifier "in confining...walkers", sentence seems incomplete.
Does A communicate illogical meaning?
What's the meaning difference between In confining vs confining (A vs C)?

(A) that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited
Show more

In option (A), "in confining babies ... to strollers..." acts as a modifier modifying "muscle development".
But muscle development is not the one confining babies.

We need to say that confining babies inhibits muscle development.
"Confining babies" is the subject, the do-er of the action of inhibiting muscle development.

(C) that confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development

Clearly tells us "confining babies can inhibit muscle development" - Correct
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
 [1]
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 18 Nov 2021, 03:49
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
Hi Experts,
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
In A, I agree that if we remove modifier "in confining...walkers", sentence seems incomplete.
Does A communicate illogical meaning?
What's the meaning difference between In confining vs confining (A vs C)?

(A) that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited
Show more

Hello Sneha2021,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can resolve your doubt.

The construction "in + present participle ("verb+ing" - "confining" in this sentence)" is a modifying phrase that conveys the meaning "by taking a particular action" or "in the process of taking a particular action". In Option A, the phrase "in confining babies much of the time to strollers..." incorrectly modifies "muscle development", illogically implying that it is muscle development that confines babies in strollers etc.

In Option C, the present participle ("verb+ing" - "confining" in this sentence) is not part of a modifying phrase; rather, it acts as a gerund - a noun - that refers to the act of "confining babies much of the time to strollers..." and is the subject of the clause. Thus, Option C conveys the intended meaning - that the act of confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
avatar
drewgr
avatar
Joined: 09 Dec 2021
Last visit: 09 Feb 2022
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 108
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Real Estate
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
Posts: 3
Kudos: 5
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 02 Jan 2022, 06:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can someone further explain this
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 02 Jan 2022, 12:39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
drewgr
can someone further explain this
Show more
Hello, drewgr. It would be helpful if you provided more detail as to what, exactly, you do not understand. When I scroll through the responses in the thread, I see half a dozen from different Experts. Is some point that may be causing you trouble not addressed in any one of them? If so, let us know in the thread, and I am sure someone would be happy to offer assistance.

- Andrew
User avatar
harish555
User avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2019
Last visit: 15 Apr 2025
Posts: 157
Own Kudos:
37
Given Kudos: 386
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '24 (A$$)
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V30
GPA: 3.03
WE:Marketing (Retail Banking)
Schools: Kelley '24 (A$$)
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V30
Posts: 157
Kudos: 37
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 02 Jan 2022, 13:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited.


(A) that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited

Muscle development can be inhibited for whom ?. Its not clear in the sentence. Meaning is distorted. A is Out

(B) that, in their confinement much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited in babies

Their confinement – Its totally wrong. The confinement of CD specialists cannot inhibit muscle development of babies. B is out.

(C) that confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development
Perfect .

(D) that babies, if confined much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development
Much closer . But still lengthy when compared with option C.

(E) that strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can, if babies are confined to the much of the time, result in muscle development being inhibited
There are many issues with E. Being inhibited -awkward. Confined to what ?

So, C is the best choice
User avatar
niyatisuri
User avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2022
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 37
Kudos: 1
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 12 Apr 2022, 01:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello GMATNinja, egmat, gmatverbal

Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited.


(A) that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited
After removing the modifier, the sentence says 'Child development specialists believe that muscle development can be inhibited' which seems an incomplete sentence because the essential part of how and whose development is inhibited should also be part of the sentence

(B) that, in their confinement much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited in babies
After removing the modifier, the sentence says 'Child development specialists believe that muscle development can be inhibited' which seems an incomplete sentence because the essential part of how development is inhibited should also be part of the sentence.
Also 'their' could be CD specialists


(C) that confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development

(D) that babies, if confined much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development
After removing the modifier, the sentence says 'Child development specialists believe that babies can inhibit muscle development' which seems incorrect

(E) that strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can, if babies are confined to the much of the time, result in muscle development being inhibited
After removing the modifier, the sentence says 'Child development specialists believe that strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can result in muscle development being inhibited' where usage of being is unnecessary, also incomplete sentence because the essential part of development is inhibited should also be part of the sentence

Please provide feedback on my analysis

Regards,
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 12 Apr 2022, 05:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
niyatisuri
Hello GMATNinja, egmat, gmatverbal

Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited.


(A) that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited
After removing the modifier, the sentence says 'Child development specialists believe that muscle development can be inhibited' which seems an incomplete sentence because the essential part of how and whose development is inhibited should also be part of the sentence

(B) that, in their confinement much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited in babies
After removing the modifier, the sentence says 'Child development specialists believe that muscle development can be inhibited' which seems an incomplete sentence because the essential part of how development is inhibited should also be part of the sentence.
Also 'their' could be CD specialists


(C) that confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development

(D) that babies, if confined much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development
After removing the modifier, the sentence says 'Child development specialists believe that babies can inhibit muscle development' which seems incorrect

(E) that strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can, if babies are confined to the much of the time, result in muscle development being inhibited
After removing the modifier, the sentence says 'Child development specialists believe that strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can result in muscle development being inhibited' where usage of being is unnecessary, also incomplete sentence because the essential part of development is inhibited should also be part of the sentence

Please provide feedback on my analysis

Regards,
Show more

Hello niyatisuri,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, your reasoning is largely correct.

However, we have one small point of correction; none of the sentences formed by removing the information between the commas are incomplete; rather, the error is that information vital to the core meaning of the sentence - that it is the act of confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development - has been placed between commas; remember, information vital to the core meaning of the sentence must never be placed between commas; only extra information can be included between commas.

To understand the concept of "Extra Information Between Commas" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



We hope this helps.

All the best!
Experts' Global Team
avatar
amangupta207
avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2022
Last visit: 03 Aug 2022
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 55
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 12 Apr 2022, 23:36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO C.

Babies should be the subject of the second clause and can is the verb for the subject
User avatar
woohoo921
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
142
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 516
Kudos: 142
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 02 Nov 2022, 20:48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
Jat
Can an expert explain the reason why option D is selected over option C?


Hello Jat,


Thank you for the query. :-)

Let's read what choice D has to say: ...babies, if confined much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development (I have struck out the modifier to focus on the Subject-Verb pair).

According to this choice, the babies can inhibit muscle development. This certainly is illogical. The babies do not inhibit the muscle development. The sentence intends to say that because they are confined to certain objects, the muscle development in babies can be inhibited.

Choice C does convey this meaning by saying: ...confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
Show more

egmat

Thank you for your helpful reply. When I read this question, "much of the time" seemed unidiomatic and my ear so desperately wanted this to be "most of the time". Then I saw it was a non-issue because it was in all of the choices.

Out of curiosity, when would you "much of the time" vs. "most of the time"?

Thank you for your time and help.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [1]
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 02 Nov 2022, 21:04
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey woohoo921

You're very welcome! Happy to be of help.


The word 'time' is an uncountable noun. This means we must use adjectives, pronouns, or determines of Quantity (and not number) with 'time'.

Now, both 'most' and 'much' can be used with uncountable nouns. For example,

a. Most of the cake was wasted.
b. Much of the cake was wasted.

What's important to understand is the difference in meaning between 'much' and 'most'.

"Much" means a significant amount. Whereas "most" means more than 50%. "Much" need not be more than 50%. It only needs to be considerable/significant.


"Much" is the uncountable counterpart of "many". And the difference between "much" and "most", is the same as that between "many" and "most". (Note that 'most' can be used with both countable and uncountable nouns)



So, both idioms "much of the time" and "most of the time" exist in English, and they have very different meanings.


I hope this improves your understanding.


Happy Learning!

Abhishek
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,833
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,833
Kudos: 986
Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much 09 Jan 2024, 19:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
188 posts