Hello, I chose option C for this as well, but when here is how I reasoned my way to option B.
Based on the info in the statement, we can say that
total light emitted = (light per unit mass) * (total mass)
The statement says that the light per unit mass is much lower than previously estimated.
Evaluating option A: Incorrect because it compares two different comets while the statement only talks about Halley's Comet and general characteristics of a comet.
Option B: if we express the equation above such that we have mass on the LHS, we can see that the previous estimate for the mass was too low (because the denominator-- light per unit mass was higher) compared to the recent estimate. Correct
Option C: to make a conclusion about the total amount of light, we need information about the total mass of the comet, which the statement does not provide. So this inference is not fully supported.
Option D: Incorrect. Like A, D compares properties of two different comets.
Option E: I had a tough time eliminating this choice. From the equation above, to fully conclude on the mass of the comet we also need information about the total light, which is not presented in the statement. But in the absence of that information, if we assume that the total light has not changed, then we can eliminate this choice because there is sufficient information to make a conclusion about the mass of the comet.
Please feel free to correct me if my reasoning is flawed. I think my reasoning for eliminating E is not as solid as I'd like it to be.
Bunuel
Comets do not give off their own light but reflect light from other sources, such as the Sun. Scientists estimate the mass of comets by their brightness: the greater a comet’s mass, the more light that comet will reflect. A satellite probe, however, has revealed that the material of which Halley’s comet is composed reflects 60 times less light per unit of mass than had been previously thought.
The statements above, if true, give the most support to which one of the following?
(A) Some comets are composed of material that reflects 60 times more light per unit of mass than the material of which Halley’s comet is composed.
(B) Previous estimates of the mass of Halley’s comet which were base on its brightness were too low.
(C) The total amount of light reflected from Halley’s comet is less than scientists had previously thought.
(D) The reflective properties of the material of which comets are composed vary considerably from comet to comet.
(E) Scientists need more information before they can make a good estimate of the mass of Halley’s comet.