B is the right answer.Quote:
Premise 1: Common patterns of fallacious reasoning are endemic to everyday life and once adopted cannot be corrected.
Premise 2: Poor reasoning skills waste public and private money, make people less efficient and productive, and diminish our national capacity to compete abroad.
Counter-Premise 3: But within the past few years, a “thinking skills” movement has arisen. The teaching of reasoning skills is part of this larger movement to make students think more critically.
Counter-Premise: Increasingly, as part of the teaching of decision-making, college students are successfully learning to avoid common patterns of fallacious reasoning that they habitually commit, and, in the process, to acquire sound reasoning skills.
The passage starts by stating that common patterns of fallacious reasoning are endemic to everyday life and once these common patterns are adopted, they cannot be corrected. Meanwhile, along the line, the passage states that a "thinking skills" movement has arisen and that the teaching of reasoning skills is part of this larger movement aimed at making students think critically. It went on further to state that college students are successfully learning to avoid common patterns of fallacious reasoning that they habitually commit.
The statement that
college students are successfully learning to avoid common patterns of fallacious reasoning that they habitually commit clearly contradicts the first claim in the argument that
once common patterns of fallacious reasoning are adopted, they cannot be corrected. This is the flaw in the argument, hence B is the right answer.
Quote:
(A) The passage fails to establish a connection between the teaching of decision-making and the teaching of reasoning skills.
Since the teaching of decision-making and teaching of reasoning skills are both counter-premises, it can be implied that they are both connected as part of the "thinking skills" movement. Hence, the absence of an explicit connection between the teaching of decision making and reasoning skills cannot be seen as a flaw to the information presented. The bigger issue relates to the contradictory statements that once common patterns of fallacious reasoning are adopted, they cannot be corrected and that college students are learning to avoid common patterns of fallacious reasoning that they habitually commit. A is incorrect.
Quote:
(B) The passage contradicts itself by both affirming and denying that patterns of fallacious reasoning can be corrected.
This is the correct answer in line with the above.
Quote:
(C) The passage uses circular reasoning by first stating that patterns of fallacious reasoning diminish our capacity for competition and then asserting that lack of competition leads to a lessening of skills.
There is no circular reasoning exhibited in the passage above; hence C is incorrect.
Quote:
(D) The passage makes an unwarranted inference from improving thinking skills to teaching reasoning skills.
The flaw as established above does not relate to any inference made from improving thinking skills to teaching reasoning skills. Clearly the passage talks about thinking skills as a movement that arose few years after the adoption of common patterns of fallacious reasoning, which cannot be corrected and that the teaching of reasoning skills is part of this larger thinking skills movement. D is thus incorrect.
Quote:
(E) The passage fails to link the teaching of decision-making to the larger movement to make students think more critically.
Just as in A, the link between the teaching of decision making and the teaching of reasoning skills are connected and both are linked to larger movement to make students think more critically. E is therefore incorrect.