Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:56 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:56
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Weaken|                  
User avatar
lexis
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Last visit: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 218
Own Kudos:
2,198
 [64]
Posts: 218
Kudos: 2,198
 [64]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
55
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
vityakim@gmail.com
Joined: 25 Feb 2017
Last visit: 04 Aug 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
115
 [10]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: Korea, Republic of
Schools: LBS '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.67
Products:
Schools: LBS '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 13
Kudos: 115
 [10]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vnigam21
Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Last visit: 19 Aug 2017
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
194
 [5]
Given Kudos: 135
Status:Final Call! Will Achieve Target ANyHow This Tym! :)
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
Posts: 68
Kudos: 194
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Nihit
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Last visit: 16 Sep 2017
Posts: 258
Own Kudos:
2,281
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 258
Kudos: 2,281
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am for B as well but the choice carefully hides the usage of considered . It should be considers.
The answer could be Choice C . Since the employees were sick while working ,injuries could have been caused as a result. What is the OA?
User avatar
prasannar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Last visit: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 352
Own Kudos:
4,005
 [1]
Posts: 352
Kudos: 4,005
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to records maintained by each company, the employees of
Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P

Company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Company O.-> thus B
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 845
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 845
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imo B
We have to look for something that would justify in spite of having more accidents company P is good or there is something else that is counted in P than in O
So B gives a reason that the conclusion will be wrong because more no of incident are takes as accidents in P , so it does not necessarily means that employee of O will be less prone to safety .
Suppose some incident is considered an accident in company P , but that incident is not considered an accident in company O then we can have safety related problems in company O.
avatar
rahularman
Joined: 03 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Sep 2022
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 12
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My 2 cents to the discussion....

#employees …P=O
#hours per week..…P=O
Job related accidents...last year….…O<P
=> employees of O are less likely to have job-related accidents than P

Argument type : Analogy

Weaken conclusion : will have to show less similarity between employees of O & P


(A) The employees of Company P lost more time at work due to job-related accidents than did the employees of Company O.

# time lost by P-E’s > O-E’s => P had more accidents than O; supports

(B) Company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Company O.

# criteria was different, which jeopardises calculation authenticity; weakens conclusion.

(C) The employees of Company P were sick more often than were the employees of Company O.

# sickness is out of scope of argument, so no impact on conclusion

(D) Several employees of Company O each had more than one job-related accident.

# Employees having multiple accidents doesn’t has any impact on conclusion. Target is to weaken overall accident.

(E) The majority of job-related accidents at Company O involved a single machine.

# argument focuses on job-related accidents, not machine specific..so out of scope..
User avatar
vinsin03
Joined: 18 Nov 2022
Last visit: 28 Oct 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 176
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
why not option C?
Option C also weakens the argument.
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,383
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,105
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,383
Kudos: 82,110
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Huh! Found this question in the Verbal OG 2025-2026, #145
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,228
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,228
Kudos: 1,568
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion?

(A) The employees of Company P lost more time at work due to job-related accidents than did the employees of Company O.

(B) Company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Company O.

(C) The employees of Company P were sick more often than were the employees of Company O.

(D) Several employees of Company O each had more than one job-related accident.

(E) The majority of job-related accidents at Company O involved a single machine.


This is an interesting one. The answer is (B) because if Company P considers more types of accidents to be job-related than Company O, this means there could be an artifical difference being created. This is a bit extra but imagine if Company P considered 1000 different types of accidents to be job-related but Company O considered only 1 of those to be. You could have a situation in which you have a similar number of accidents in both companies over the course of a year... but, technically, a different number of job-related ones based on what the company where the accident took place defines a job-related accident to be.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts