Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 05:41 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 05:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 05 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
14,900
 []
Given Kudos: 766
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 14,900
 []
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Escalate
Joined: 02 Jun 2014
Last visit: 06 Apr 2016
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
10
 []
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 37
Kudos: 10
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,341
Own Kudos:
3,705
 []
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,341
Kudos: 3,705
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
swapyuee
Joined: 10 May 2015
Last visit: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
7
 []
Given Kudos: 57
Posts: 11
Kudos: 7
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Several energy alternative research programs have recently suffered a variety of setbacks, particularly among larger scale research programs. Those larger scale failures also tend to involve a greater financial loss. Therefore, larger scale research programs should be phased out in favor of multiple smaller ones.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for the reasoning above?

Ⓐ Larger scale energy research programs are more likely to uncover a relevant breakthrough, while smaller projects can investigate more aspects of energy generation and storage, though less thoroughly.
-- We would be interested in it , if we were concerned about breakthroughs .
Ⓑ It is just as easy to adjust, and even abandon small programs as it is with large ones.
-- This doesn't give any more of a reason for phasing out the larger scale research programs.
Ⓒ The cost of starting a new energy research program increases every year.
-- It does the same for small scale research programs.
Ⓓ Project planners tend to favor work on smaller programs rather than larger ones.
-- Does the preference of project planner matter in deciding the phase out ? For D to work we need to assume that it does.
Ⓔ Larger scale energy research programs are more likely to fail and so correspondingly involve greater financial risk than a comparably scaled collection of smaller programs.
-- [color=#ed145b]Seems like a restatement. if E is true the reason mentioned in the premise becomes more probable. [/color]

so , IMO E ...
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 05 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 766
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 14,900
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
STRENGTHEN QUESTION SERIES Question 1

Several energy alternative research programs have recently suffered a variety of setbacks, particularly among larger scale research programs. Those larger scale failures also tend to involve a greater financial loss. Therefore, larger scale research programs should be phased out in favor of multiple smaller ones.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for the reasoning above?

    Ⓐ Larger scale energy research programs are more likely to uncover a relevant breakthrough, while smaller projects can investigate more aspects of energy generation and storage, though less thoroughly.
    Ⓑ It is just as easy to adjust, and even abandon small programs as it is with large ones.
    Ⓒ The cost of starting a new energy research program increases every year.
    Ⓓ Project planners tend to favor work on smaller programs rather than larger ones.
    Ⓔ Larger scale energy research programs are more likely to fail and so correspondingly involve greater financial risk than a comparably scaled collection of smaller programs.


Official Explanation:
Question Type: Strengthen
Boil It Down (Simplified & Abbreviated Summary of the Prompt): Larger projects: more failures, bigger loss -> Replace large with many smaller projects
Missing Information (assumption): Switching to many smaller projects is ultimately better.
Goal: Find an option that supports the notion that smaller is ultimately better. The argument does a shockingly poor job of providing evidence that switching to many smaller projects actually is preferable. For all we know, what if it’s only the large scale programs that can yield the most significant breakthroughs?

Let’s see which option best achieves the goal:
Ⓐ If larger scale programs are more likely to uncover a relevant breakthrough, that would run counter to the argument that we should switch to a multitude of smaller programs. Additionally, this option even undercuts the utility of smaller projects in stating that even though they can investigate a greater number of aspects, they do so LESS THOROUGHLY. Gone. A 180 option. This option seeks to penalize those who lose track of what the question is asking. People who pick this option do so because they think they’re being asked to weaken.

Ⓑ If we’re trying to strengthen the notion that we should switch from larger programs to smaller programs, how on earth would stating that it’s just as easy to adjust or abandon small programs as it is large programs help? To at least lend some support to the argument, we’d want this option to say that it’s EASIER to adjust or abandon small programs.

Ⓒ This option doesn’t lend support to the argument that we should switch to smaller scale programs if the costs associated with STARTING programs goes up every year. We don’t know how the start-up costs would compare between fewer larger programs, and a greater number of smaller programs. In fact, if start-up costs were similar per program regardless of the size of the program, then this option would actually weaken the argument since it would be more expensive to start a greater number of smaller programs.

Ⓓ Do we know that what project managers prefer matters? No. Whether project managers PREFER small or large scale programs is completely irrelevant to support the notion that switching to a greater number of smaller programs is more advantageous. This is a punishment option for those who make the assumption that preference matters.

Ⓔ Yes. This is our right option. The one thing that this argument lacked is some proof that switching from large scale programs to multiple smaller ones will actually be preferable. This option helps this argument in two specific ways: 1) It specifically spells out that larger scale programs are MORE LIKELY to fail, 2) It also explains that large scale programs entail a greater financial risk than a comparably scaled collection of smaller ones. This option is also careful to spell out that it’s making a fair comparison in terms of size. We can’t just compare a large program to a smaller one. If we’re making the argument that we need to shift from large scaled programs to a greater multitude of smaller ones, a fair comparison would need to compare a large program to an equivalent collection of smaller ones. This option even takes care of that for us.


STRENGTHEN QUESTION SERIES Question 2 Automobile Collectors
avatar
shamimtex03
Joined: 25 Oct 2014
Last visit: 10 May 2022
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 5
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here the conclusion is large scale research programs should be phased out in favor of smaller ones because increased failure + more financial loss. Hence, the author must assume that the replacement in favor of smaller ones would generate less failure + less financial loss than larger programs would. We need to make the conclusion or the assumption more likely . Answer choice E did what we need.
User avatar
nahid78
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Last visit: 30 Apr 2023
Posts: 287
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,062
Products:
Posts: 287
Kudos: 665
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatMax
STRENGTHEN QUESTION SERIES Question 1 Several Energy Alternative Programs

Several energy alternative research programs have recently suffered a variety of setbacks, particularly among larger scale research programs. Those larger scale failures also tend to involve a greater financial loss. Therefore, larger scale research programs should be phased out in favor of multiple smaller ones.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for the reasoning above?

    Ⓐ Larger scale energy research programs are more likely to uncover a relevant breakthrough, while smaller projects can investigate more aspects of energy generation and storage, though less thoroughly.
    Ⓑ It is just as easy to adjust, and even abandon small programs as it is with large ones.
    Ⓒ The cost of starting a new energy research program increases every year.
    Ⓓ Project planners tend to favor work on smaller programs rather than larger ones.
    Ⓔ Larger scale energy research programs are more likely to fail and so correspondingly involve greater financial risk than a comparably scaled collection of smaller programs.


48 Hour Window Answer & Explanation Window
Earn KUDOS! Post your answer and reasoning why the answer you chose is correct, and why the other 4 options are incorrect within 48 hours of this post.
OA, and explanation will be posted after 48 hour window closes.

Scroll Down For Official Explanation

STRENGTHEN QUESTION SERIES Question 2 Automobile Collectors


Several energy alternative research programs have recently suffered a variety of setbacks, particularly among larger scale research programs --> Premise
Those larger scale failures also tend to involve a greater financial loss---> Premise
Therefore, larger scale research programs should be phased out in favor of multiple smaller ones.---> conclusion

we are asked to strengthen the conclusion. so we have to find something that says Large programs are the cause of this loss, or small programs are better than large project.

A) weaken the conclusion
B) irrelevant
C) out of scope
d) out of scope
E) strengthen the conclusion.

So E is the correct answer.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 17,992
Own Kudos:
Posts: 17,992
Kudos: 902
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts