Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 19:57 |
It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 19:57 |
|
|
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
07:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: What a conference can reveal about sustainability & the future of our society |
|
I was lucky enough to receive an invitation to join a two-day conference by the Innovation Forum in London on the future of sustainability in commodity supply chains. Here is a wrap-up of the discussion, together with some topics that fascinate me. Please note that this conference was held under Chatham House rule, so no names will be associated with specific quotes. ![]() Takeaway #1: “sustainability has become a business imperative” Scientists are clear that if sustainability is not being prioritized, some commodities may disappear. In a panel discussion, a C-suite Executive said that sustainability is now part of their daily operations. It became a business imperative and not just a moral right. Therefore, it is also the role of the sales staff to educate and sell the “business case” to direct customers and consumers. On the importance of public commitments, he said it is critical to understand exactly what you want to tackle, then commit to it publicly to hold you accountable and be prepared to be challenged. Have a real plan with well-defined targets and report progress frequently versus commitments. Work with local NGOs and external partners to increase consumer trust and get the right expertise. Another C-suite executive claimed there is a dichotomy between sustainable food and cheap food. Consumers fail to recognise that. Land dedicated to farming is not growing, so if climate changes are going to shift farming practices, this in turn is going to reduce the number of farms without any improvement in productivity. Can we imagine a world where the things we love to eat, for example chocolate, are not going to be readily available? And due to their reduced availability the prices will go up? Takeaway #2: “When you know, you cannot NOT act” – Post 2020 commitments Being transparent and honest is the key to progress. A food manufacturer pragmatically started his speech by saying that the industry collectively failed on many of the different commitments set 10 years ago. He claimed that “it has been a decade of first starting certifying poverty, rolling out tools which were about sending people to other places, auditing locals about standards that are loose and regulations that are weak.” The upcoming decade will be the real truth because companies cannot hide behind saying that they don’t know because actually, they do know now (i.e. most of them have transparency back to the growing level, for some portions of their sourcing activities at least). A well-known activist NGO said that “the value of the food system is 10 trillion USD, while the cost is 12 trillion USD, so basically the system is bankrupt in the sense that all the costs are externalized” So it is good that multinational companies are recognizing that they have failed in meeting their commitments, but what is the nature of the system that we’re talking about? If you pay 2.50 USD for a cup of coffee, 1 cent will go to the grower. Same in chocolate, cocoa farmers get between 50-80 cents a day as a wage, and this is for a 50 billion USD industry. The NGO concluded by saying “let’s be clear about where blame lies in terms of the system: the food manufacturers/traders are getting huge free lunch and they’re having very profitable industries where they don’t support all the costs” So externalized cost related to the environment has to be internalized, if we want to transform the system. Should we solely blame the industry? No, I mean governments have to be blamed equally. In 2015 the EU signed the Amsterdam declaration where they agree they would get deforestation-free for all agricultural commodities ending in Europe, but this has still not happened. Another example: if you ask meat & dairy producers today where their soya comes from? (Used as animal feedstock) Almost nobody could answer that question. So to sum up, the reason why all these companies fail is perhaps that they want sustainability and business as usual, and I doubt these two do go together. ![]() Takeaway #3: The limits of certification – where does my chocolate come from & how was it made? As a consumer, I have always believed that when purchasing certified chocolate, I am doing something good for the environment or at least for the local communities growing the cocoa ingredients used in my chocolate bar. But what’s the point of certification, if my product is associated with deforestation anyway and farmers are not paid a living income? There have been recent investigations showing that certified cocoa was linked to farms with children using machetes and insecticides, or certified farms located inside nationally protected forests in West Africa. (cf. Washington Post article) Additionally, as a consumer, it is crucial to know how certification is being done today. Ethical labels like UTZ, Fairtrade, or Rainforest alliance typically sample farms for inspection. Meaning a cooperative of 1000 farmers seeking certification might be inspected by auditors on 32 farms only. Audits are usually announced in advance, which allows farmers to hide evidence of any breach with the standards. There is also “a substantial financial incentive to fool the auditors. If the farmers pass the audit, they may receive about USD 80 extra per MT of cocoa they sell”, so the real question is whether the very academic certification guidelines developed in the Western countries can be enforced in an environment where illiteracy and poverty are the norm and where basic infrastructure is often missing? In the end what matters is the real impact of that certification on the local communities. Takeaway #4: “plant-based is the new normal” – evolving consumer expectations In the last 5 years, the level of understanding globally on environmental and sustainability issues has grown exponentially. We see material shifts in demand from consumer’s changes in dietary habits, which is pushing the dialogue to the entire value chain. Generally, people switching to a vegetarian diet are doing it for animal welfare, but the environment is also an important criterion. For the same amount of calorie intake, beef produces 40x more CO2 than a vegetable. In terms of the environment, eating beef is not insignificant. What you eat has a large impact on the environment. Animal agriculture is one of the biggest drivers of global warming as seen below (cf. chart from World Resources Institute). New products are being launched like Impossible burgers (cf. listen to Rich Roll podcast), which are lab-grown burger patties using genetically modified ingredients. The other plant-based burgers like for instance Beyond burgers use a mix of plant proteins such as soy, pea, rice, mung beans. More questionable, Mosa meat produces artificial meat, i.e. from a stem cell they produce meat cells. The impact is real, on greenhouse gases, on the required arable land, water-saving, and contributing to the growth of an emerging economic sector. The main success factors for replacement of animal proteins by non-animal proteins are; competitive prices, tastes must be attractive, legislation must evolve so that current meat & dairy products must assume external costs, a support program for transition periods for farmers, and of course, remain vigilant because the effects of innovations are not all known. ![]() Takeaway #5: Use of technology to help sustainability progress In a podcast, Christian Nils Schwab from the EPFL Food & Nutrition Center mentioned that today food production consumes 37% of the land area with problems of deforestation, urbanization and global warming that will further reduce the amount of land available. Food production is responsible for 25% of greenhouse gas discharges. Food production is also responsible for 70% of the freshwater withdrawals. It is responsible for half of the 141 million MT of plastic waste generated each year. At the same time, we have 3.5 billion people that are undernourished because of a lack of vitamins and trace elements. On the other hand, 2 billion people are in a state of overeating, 500 million are obese. The most efficient production techniques we have; namely intensive agriculture or intensive livestock are environmental disasters. The observation is that the current food production system is unsustainable and that we will have to produce 60% more volume by 2050. Technological innovation can help solve this conundrum and here are a few examples of startups that bring optimism. Protix develops feed for livestock farms using insects to recover available proteins from organic waste. So, these insects will be used to feed salmons in fisheries or livestock at poultry farms. What an amazing innovation being able to value waste, using insects instead of traditional grains and cereals. Another startup called Impact vision is using hyperspectral technology on food to be able to detect the appearance of certain particles that are linked to the senescence of the products. So, it will allow them to have their composition and freshness state. This is amazing in the sense that if you can question the nutritional values of your ingredients, it opens up new perspectives. So we could imagine price models based not exclusively on quantity but on nutritional values so those visually strange organic carrots would have a higher nutritional value, which could have a more attractive price and positive incentive for farmers and avoid practices like grading fruits and vegetables. Another interesting use cased of this technology is to optimize transportation by looking at the batch of avocados and identify which ones will ripen first. An existential question we’ve been asking ourselves is, “what food is right for me?” And nutrigenomics is an exciting field where start-ups like Habit Food are striving. Habit Food provides solutions in personalized nutrition by: 1/ Looking at your DNA, blood, behavior and metabolic function 2/ Set up a nutrition plan with recommendations on what to eat based on your body’s unique needs. Finally, there are a lot of exciting innovations, like Swiss start-up Gamaya that help farmers better manage their fields, and improve their yields, but also Airbus Starling which offers its satellite technology to corporates & NGOs to better track progress against no-deforestation commitments in supply chains. I am excited by all the innovations appearing and their potential impact on our life. Farming is an input-output dilemma. If we reduce the inputs (water, fertilizers), sustainably (taking into account soils & biodiversity) while maintaining the output, and at the same time allocate more equally those output to people around the world, we would be overcoming a central challenge of our society Takeaway #6: Sustainable finance in food There was a session with global banks on sustainable finance. We know companies that drive deforestation or unsustainable practices require financing, so banks have some leverage to play here. More and more banks receive inquiries from clients to help them undertake the sustainability issue (80%), and not only improving working capital (20%). Clients worry about sustainability from a risk and opportunity aspect, but they struggle to understand what to do. It’s the same knowledge gap that we see with consumers, so the businesses are no different. Today global banks are building sustainability criteria and framework on how to price loans. One of the banks spoke to a large corporate client and they said that they would like their supplier to be carbon neutral. Could you look at helping us identify a wind farm that will supply them with electricity? Then the client asked the bank about the sustainability of the wind farm. What’s the local benefit? Does it deliver jobs, wealth creation? How many birds are getting killed by the wind farm? Why are they asking about it? Because they were going to sign a purchase agreement for 10 years with the supplier, so they need to manage their reputation risk. First, you have to define policies to help bankers on how to work and decide when to deal with companies or not. But banks also have the role to finance the “bad players” to do the green transition, and not only lend to the good players. But banks are very regulated, so if you want to change the credit review process, you have to lobby the regulators to make the change happen. Some people asked us to get out of coal. So the bank decided to stop financing coal, but they still have to manage existing assets on their books, because if suddenly the bank decided to put those assets out, it would create an asset crisis and you would bankrupt many people, so financing the transition is critical. The dynamics are very complex and there is a need for alignment and consensus between all banks and regulators. The financial sector needs to define measurements of impacts to allocate capital on purpose. It is also about changing behavior. Bankers used to work in silos but sustainability cannot be solved independently. For instance, bankers are not specialists in palm oil plantations. Conclusion: Sustainability is a non-linear complex issue. The problem is that the future is not visible today, so the payoff, being so far in the future, it is hard to link to the reflection today. Additionally, it requires the action of various stakeholders. I believe there is a need to work more synergistically and systemically. It is also crucial that CEOs and board-level executives have compensation linked to sustainability targets, perhaps even the system of quarterly earnings review has to be changed because you can’t be sustainable quarterly, but companies need a long term view (cf. see LTSE founded by Eric Ries). Finally, I believe consumers & technology have also a key role to play to transform the industry and push governments to regulate towards better use of natural resources without harming our planet for the future generations. As one of speaker greatly summarised with an African proverb “if you want to go fast go alone if you want to go far go together”. Thanks for reading. Sources & further readings:
|
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Introducing… Bloomberg Market Concepts (BMC) |
|
If you’re looking for a course that provides an introduction to the global economy and financial markets, then Bloomberg Market Concepts (BMC) might be the answer. Created by Bloomberg, BMC is an e-learning tool. It is an 10-12 hour interactive self-paced certification course delivered through the Bloomberg terminal. The course content utilises Bloomberg data, news and analytics to teach financial concepts. It now consists of 3 courses enabling you to learn more about the financial markets. The Core Concepts course has 4 modules (takes approx. 8 hours) which cover the following areas:
Portfolio analysis (approx. 2 hours) explains how to create a portfolio, learn how to invest in your portfolio and use tools to analyse the performance of your portfolio. [Please note: no live trading is possible on Bloomberg academic subscriptions]. After successful completion of BMC, you will receive a certificate of completion which is available to download and include on your CV. To access BMC you will need to make sure you have set up your Bloomberg account and have your own login. You can then get started by typing: BMC <GO> in the top left corner of the screen. ![]() If you have any questions about BMC, then please contact MIRC. |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Q&A with Iain Gray, Director of Aerospace at Cranfield University. |
![]() With the drive for a more sustainable Aviation Industry, what changes do you foresee in Commercial Aircraft to help realise this vision? “I think this year has seen the sector recognise and appreciate the significance and the role that aviation and aerospace has to play. In terms of changes, I think there are several elements. One is on the technology itself; there is an increased focus around electrification, battery technologies, and hydrogen fuels think it also reinforces the importance on areas like lightweighting with the drive to reduce the weight of aircraft. But I also think it means that people need to understand a lot more about the overall system in which aerospace operates. This is where Cranfield’s has a real advantage, students studying aerospace need to understand where aerospace fits in an overall aviation system and where the aviation system fits in an overall environmental context. It isn’t just about being focused around a specific platform design or aircraft design. It’s about understanding how an aircraft and aircraft operations fits into and impacts he environment. How it links with air traffic control, links with the airport, links with other forms of infrastructure. I think that’s how it’s changing, there’s a much bigger emphasis on the overall integrated system level.” What do you think are some of the most exciting career opportunities that these changes are going to enable graduates of the future to go into? “In terms of opportunities, again, there are many different opportunities. Some of them perhaps as a direct consequence of the environmental challenges, like the potential for smaller companies that are making electric aircraft or hydrogen-powered aircraft, are going to be looking for graduates in a way that for the last twenty or thirty years they haven’t been. There are some fantastic opportunities for new graduates to get involved with smaller companies that are looking at products driven by these environmental challenge opportunities. I also think it’s exciting because in the same way as I described earlier, the fact that people now need to understand where they fit within that broader aviation eco-system. I think there will be more mobility, people that have worked in aircraft design will be needed within airports or needed in air traffic control environments. It’s presenting the opportunity for graduates to go up in terms of the eco-system chain. That’s fantastic, that gives a much broader range of career opportunities.” How do you think Cranfield’s helping to provide graduates with the required skill sets? “I think Cranfield has a long-standing reputation in its traditional courses and the traditional courses need to adapt to this changing environment but Cranfield is also introducing new subject areas; robotics and applied artificial intelligence being two very good examples of new courses that address new technology requirements that help to develop the kind of skillsets industry are looking for in this new environment.” To find out more about the range of courses available, visit ourwebsite or get in touch. What advice would you give to an engineer looking to start their career in the Aerospace sector? “Follow their intuition, do things, be brave, take advantage of some of these exciting opportunities within the sector, consider the large OEMs, Airlines, Airports, SME’s and start-ups there are exciting careers opportunities right across the sector Do the things you want to do, the opportunities are there to do that in a way they haven’t been for the last two, three decades.” For further details about our Aerospace offering: https://www.cranfield.ac.uk/themes/aerospace |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Use up to 190 academic libraries across the UK for free! |
|
If you are studying or working away from our two University sites, you may find it more convenient to use a library service nearer to you. Cranfield University Library Service has signed up to the SCONUL Access scheme which gives all our staff and students free access to up to 190 university library services across the UK and Ireland. The libraries you will be entitled to use will depend on which user category you fall into (postgraduate or PhD student; full time or part time; academic and support staff). Which library services will I be able to use? All SCONUL Access members are welcome to use library stock for reference purposes. Depending on your status you may also borrow up to three items on a six week loan basis. Before you visit, we recommend you search the participating Library’s catalogue to make sure the items are available and that SCONUL Access members are entitled to borrow them. Membership does not entitle you as a visitor to use another library’s electronic resources or have general use of their computers. However, Cranfield University is a member of the eduroam wireless service so you will be able to access the internet and our own online resources from the library you are visiting via your laptop. Please ensure you have set up your eduroam account prior to your visit. How do I join? Visit the SCONUL Access website and enter your details. You can then see a list of all the libraries you are entitled to use within the scheme. Select the first library you wish to visit and fill in the online form to apply for access. We will check your application within three working days to ensure you are a registered user with no outstanding problems on your account. Once your application is approved you will receive an email confirming your eligibility for the scheme. What should I know about visiting another library? You just need to take a copy of your approval email and your Cranfield University library card to the library that you wish to join and they will issue you with their own library card. You will need to take this membership card with you each time you visit. Please remember to abide by the rules of the library you are visiting. We recommend you check the website of any library you intend to use prior to your visit for their opening hours and any conditions of access. For example, you may need to supply a passport-sized photograph for your membership card or new cards may only be issued during office hours. Some libraries also restrict the times at which SCONUL Access members are able to visit, particularly during the April-June period. What if I want to visit more than one other library? If you wish to visit another library that is part of the SCONUL Access scheme, you do not need to reapply. Just take a copy of your approval email and your Cranfield University library card when you visit. Join the SCONUL Access scheme Photo CC BY-ND 2.0 from https://www.flickr.com/photos/mendolusshank/9248154171 |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Team of Teams |
|
New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World General Stanley McChrystal You Tube –https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH8lMXBVjN8 Summarised by Keith Thompson Introduction Business leaders and managers constantly seek to create, and sustain over time, successful and high performing organisations. In his book, McChrystal draws upon his experience of the war against Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI). As leader of Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) in this war, the Allied forces were badly losing despite being better funded, trained and equipped. He tells the story of how he learned about and developed the organisation to find and ultimately killAbu Musab al-Zarqawi the leader of AQI at that time, effectively winning the campaign. Within this review, some of the key topics covered are: – Overview of the book – Key Players – Insights – Analysis of Insight – About the Author Overview McCrystal’s second book focuses on his leadership of Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) in Iraq. The Allied Forces were losing the campaign and McChrystal describes himself realising that the established practices of Command and Control from Scientific Management (Taylorism) were simply not enabling his force to deal with the agile and flat structures of the AQI terrorist network. He identified that his own organisation was complex and, therefore, would not conform to the rigid established principles developed by Taylor from the 1880’s. The core principles of Taylorism rely on controlling the variables within a production environment, which can be possible within a factory. Within the Iraq environment however, predictability of outcomes is almost impossible with the variation in conditions, complexity of operations and speed of change. The result being the creation of complex (or nonlinear) relationships – meaning a small thing (such as one change of team member, or slight change on location) could have a large impact or none at all. He recognised the work of IBM in developing the Cynefin Framework (See our previous blogs on the subject) to identify the difference between a complicated domain and a complex domain, and how they should be treated differently. It was this conflict between complexity and the application of scientific management principles which were holding his force back, while AQI could move and regroup quicker whilst adapting, almost organically, as needed. Essentially, AQI were operating the principles of Mission Command (again see our previous blogs on the subject) better than the Allies and WINNING! So McCrystal knew things had to transform in order to defeat AQI, but he writes: ‘Little of our transformation was planned. Few of the plans that we did develop unfolded as envisioned. Instead, we evolved in rapid iterations, changing—assessing—changing again’. Their plan however did have guiding principles: Have a Common Purpose – Know the mission: to disrupt and disable AQI Foster Shared Consciousness – His daily 90-minute Operational & Intelligence O&I brief via teleconference with up to 7,000 people worldwide delivering transparency and free flow of information Empowered Execution – He stopped authorising deadly strikes (he added no value) empowering the task force, as long as the decisions weren’t immoral or illegal Build Trust – Trust within Teams was great but, between teams needed development. McChrystal created highly skilled people as Liaison Officers working with other teams to improve connections and outcomes Leader as a Gardener – Changing leadership from commanding to cultivating Key Players The book was actually written by a team, but they chose to tell the story from McCrystal’s perspective making the story more personal and compelling. The additional authors were: Tantum Collins – is a writer and researcher for McChrystal. Having studied for a BA in Global Affairs at Yale he also attended McChrystal’s Course on Leadership David Silverman – A Former Navy Seal co-founder of the McChrystal Group and founder and CEO ofCrossLead Chris Fussell – is a Managing Partner at McChrystal Group, and the leader of the McChrystal Group Leadership Institute. A Former US Navy SEAL Officer and Aide-de-Camp to McChrystal during his final year leading JSOC. He also is the recognised author of One Mission (another account of McCrystal leading the war on AQI) Insights The main Deconstruct for organisations is to create teams within the hierarchy that have: · A Common Purpose · An Understanding of the Big Picture · De-centralised Authority – Empowerment to make Decisions · Trust (Key elements of military training within Mission Command) In the book, McCrystal describes how organisations (including the military) have developed since the times of the industrial revolution – effectively around “planning and discipline”. This way of organising is attributed largely to Frederick Winslow Taylor (probably one of the world’s first recognised management consultants). He also recognises Taylor’s methods, although based on Purpose and Intent (as is Mission Command), are mainly focused around reductionism (methods which are highly prevalent in some industries even today). Over the previous century, where the environment had not changed that quickly on or off the battlefield, these methods may have been appropriate. However, with the advent of the Iraq war, the game had changed fundamentally! McCrystal still needed to be disciplined, with a plan/outcome, but now needed to be agile and innovative to deal with the Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous (VUCA) conditions within which his highly skilled teams were operating. He recognised that he was fighting against an organisation that had no manual or rules to violate other than to survive and win. This made the enemy incredibly adaptable. McCrystal likens this to business today with large and highly structured organisations defending against small agile start-ups with flat organisational structures. Which reminds me of the saying “The big don’t eat the small, the fast eat the slow!” His guiding principles helped shape JSOC to become agile and innovative, delivering significant increases in the number of operations aimed at disrupting and disabling large swathes of AQI. Analysis of Insights Team of Teams references many well-known practices within industry, from recognising and improving performance to achieving a mission or a goal. These practices are underpinned by the 4 points of Deconstruct for an organisation: Purpose, Understanding, Authority and Trust. However, there is one key piece of published academic understanding that I believe was achieved unconsciously. Over the last number of years, we have been studying and incorporating the academic work of Luc Hoebeke on Human Based Activity Systems. This work details the importance of relationships and communication for humans delivering outcomes through a shared or distributed process. Hoebeke recognises the importance of the human linkages and the way they impact the commercial system. We believe results of this work are critically overlooked within many Transformation or Improvement projects conducted by most organisations today. ![]() It can be viewed as a facsimile of the working of our own brain. Our brain is made up of a number of parts capable of working independently from each other. However, it is only when these parts behave as one do we really see an effective human being. This development occurs when parts of the brain learn to communicate in order to form habits and behaviours around the way we live our lives. Communication within the brain is commonly referred to as Neural Pathways formed through these habits and behaviours and pathways are strengthened through training and repetition. It is now commonly understood that it is possible to train the brain to reinforce good behaviours or habits and similarly re-train it to remove or reduce the effects of poor behaviours or habits. Bring this thought back to our process delivery mechanism where the delivery teams are effectively parts of the brain, engineering the ‘Neural Pathways’ of the appropriate strength become a key deliverable for successful outcomes. Similarly, it becomes clear to see why reorganisations within companies result in reduced or poor performance – either permanently or at the very least while the human communication pathways heal / re-establish themselves. Strong analogies can be drawn from what McCrystal was doing with the human based activities to achieve the mission against AQI. The ‘O&I’ established a mechanism to create these pathways, but it was the introduction of ‘Liaison Officers’ developing the critical communication pathways that gave McCrystal’s organisation the success he achieved in disrupting and disabling AQI About the Author As a four star General,General McChrystal has a family history within the American military. His father was a Major General and Grandfather a Colonel. He graduated from West Point in 1976. HisWikipedia page includes much detail about his life, but through his books (My share of the task, Team of Teams and Leaders) the context of Leadership is deeply embedded throughout all his writings. |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Changes to library opening hours over Christmas |
|
Kings Norton Library The Kings Norton Library will be open 24/7 for the majority of the holiday period. It will, however, be closed from 3pm on Friday 20 December until 8am on Monday 23 December whilst the carpets are cleaned. Students are welcome to use Building 37 as an alternative study space during this time. We are sorry for any inconvenience this may cause. Library staff will work until 3pm on Friday 20 December and will resume their normal working hours from 8.30am on Thursday 2 January. In their absence, you are welcome to use the PCs and printed stock, and to borrow and return items using the self-service machines. Please remember that you will need your University ID card to access and leave the building. Management Information and Resource Centre (MIRC) Opening times for the MIRC, located in the School of Management (Building 111), will change from 16 December until 4 January as follows:
Normal opening hours will resume from Monday 6 January. School of Management students are reminded that they are welcome to use the Kings Norton Library whilst MIRC operates reduced hours, and that library staff will be available until 9pm on Thursday 2 January and Friday 3 January if they need help. Barrington Library The Barrington Library at Cranfield Defence and Security will close at 1pm on Friday 20 December. It will reopen at 8am on Thursday 2 January, but close at the earlier time of 5pm that day. Normal opening hours will resume from Friday 3 January. Photo by Drew Coffman on Unsplash |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Emerging from Chaos – and Merry Christmas Whitehall! |
|
In March we blogged about using the CYNEFIN Framework (Leading and Managing in Simple, Complicated, Complex and Chaotic Domains) to understand what methods to use in a Chaotic Environment such as BREXIT! Why Mrs May’s tactics are as likely as any to work in the current Brexit Chaos – and the Cynefin Framework! Well, it looks like, after last week’s General Election, we are starting to emerge from the Chaotic Domain, back into the more manageable Complex Domain. BUT, the crux that we noted in our blog at the time was that the new Complex Domain is going to look very different than the previous version. And, if his bite is as fierce as his bark (or blogs), watch out Whitehall! See the recent article in the FT (you’ll have to cut and paste the url into Google, since if you follow the link you’ll just get asked to subscribe): https://www.ft.com/content/a7d6a25e-1f3e-11ea-b8a1-584213ee7b2b We hope you’ve enjoyed reading our blogs over the years, and Merry Christmas to all our readers |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Helping to revive wargaming in the Royal Navy |
|
Wargaming played a vital role during World War Two in helping Royal Navy ship and submarine commanders to outthink their opponents in the Battle for the Atlantic and keep convoy supply routes to the UK open. By simulating forces and movements in a specific setting, wargames can help to prepare military commanders for the kind of tactical and operational decisions they may need to make when fighting real conflicts. There are lots of examples of where wargaming has helped in real world situations. Sticking to the maritime domain, there’s some evidence that Nelson explained his battle plan for Trafalgar to his captains with a form of wargame. More recently, the Western Approaches Training Unit was established in 1943 to help win the Battle of the Atlantic. The wargame floor was set up in Liverpool and convoy captains practised manoeuvres to defeat German u-boats. Even the advent of homing torpedoes was assessed during these wargames and tactics developed to overcome the new technology. The US Navy also used wargaming a lot in the war in the Pacific during WW2. As part of my ‘day-job’ as a helicopter simulator instructor at RNAS Culdrose in Cornwall, I am now using knowledge learnt at Cranfield to drive a wargaming revival in the Royal Navy. When I did my Defence Simulation and Modelling MSc at Cranfield Defence and Security, I included the Wargaming and Combat Modelling module. ![]() At the time (in 2006), the Royal Navy wasn’t using wargaming for training very much and the groundbreaking work that was done in 1943 at the Western Approaches Training Unit had been lost as a skill at unit level. In 2017, the Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre at Shrivenham published their Wargaming Handbook with a forward by Vice Chief of Defence Staff encouraging the MOD to regenerate the culture of wargaming. The VCDS’s words came down the chain of command and reached the Royal Navy unit that I work for as a Reservist (Merlin Helicopter Force HQ) and I was asked to attend UK Defence Academy’s Introduction to Wargaming course, run as a one-off trial run. I was then asked to allocate some of my Reservist’s time to write a wargame for Merlin Helicopter Force to see how it could be used for training. After some trial and error, help from Dstl wargamers, and attendance at the wargaming conference (Connections UK), the art and science of wargaming became part of my ‘day job’ as a simulator instructor working for Babcock. I ended up as the go-to person for designing wargames for training. ![]() Connections UK, professional wargaming conference in the UK Babcock has been working on a new training course for the Royal Navy and I’ve embedded wargames into the syllabus, using various constructs to deliver training material. These include card games as simple as Snap to poker, to mini-wargames based on Battleships and Go to full Red Cell vs Blue Cell closed wargames. Specific games are designed to meet the key learning points and enabling objectives, so when selecting methods and media during training design you pick the game mechanics best suited for the task. A training task for knowledge acquisition could be as simple as a game based on Snap where you want visual recognition of something to be connected with a name or phrase. The game is supporting repetition, relevance and recency as an aid to memory development. ![]() If you want to train the application of more abstract ideas – for example warfare tactics – then a wargame can be designed to provide an abstracted scenario to allow those tactics to be employed with reasonable outcomes. The game gives players an opportunity to see a time-compressed series of events unfold, reflect and then play again, maybe from the opposition’s point of view next time. Wargame rules are developed to constrain the players by real-world factors. After defining the training need, the design process follows on with the maths and physics of the real world, the current equipment, or known human limitations. The rules encompass those ‘facts’ and then use game mechanics – turn taking, probability assessment with dice, look-up tables, random chance cards, and others, to make the game live. The opposing player is essential – the enemy gets a vote and adds more unplanned events that have to be reacted to. Computer games are good where real-world equipment interfaces need to be trained, but artificial intelligence isn’t as challenging or surprising as a human being, and the debrief is so much more enlightening when you can talk to the opposition afterwards. The wargaming revival in the MOD is underway, regenerating a hard-won skill from some of the Royal Navy’s darkest days and delivering engaging, meaningful training to a new generation of anti-submarine warfare specialists. |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Researching… M&A |
|
Mergers and acquisitions are never very far from the news. But if you need to find out about a transaction in depth, where can you source the details you might not find in the papers? M&A Specifics Thomson One is an ideal starting point for researching M&A, providing access not just to detailed company financials, but also brokers’ reports and deal specifics for over 400,000 deals globally back to the 1970s. For that reason alone, we would recommend Thomson One as your starting point for this kind of research. ![]() Thomson One’s home screen For deals involving listed companies, the easiest way in is via the Company Overview for that firm, pictured above. Scroll down until you reach the Deals information section on the right and click through to all M&A deals. To search for deals by criteria, use the M&A Search, accessible via Thomson One’s blue navigation menu. Select ‘Screening & Analysis’ > ‘Deals & League Tables’ > ‘M&A’ > ‘Advanced Search’ to build your search. Bloomberg (available in MIRC) also has its own M&A Dashboard where you can search by specifics or simply browse deals by criteria. Access this page using Bloomberg code <MA>. ![]() Bloomberg’s M&A Dashboard Background information Once you have worked your way through the data available in Thomson One and / or Bloomberg, MIRC has a variety of other resources that will also be valuable in your research, including:
As ever, any questions, please pop in or contact us here! |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: From Malaysia to Cranfield, to Washington D.C. – Part Two |
|
Houston we have lift-off. This story is a continuation from part one where I shared my story as a PhD student at Cranfield University and my recent experience at the International Astronautical Congress 2019 as one of the grantees for the Emerging Space Leader programmes (shout out to the International Astronautical Federation (IAF)). Studying as a PhD student at Cranfield is unique. Being in the middle of nowhere means there are no distractions! In my opinion, it’s perfect for a PhD researcher. You spend three years focusing on research in a nice green village without the distractions in typical big cities. If you get stressed, there are plenty of trails to help you relax. If you’re in need of a distraction then London, Oxford and Cambridge are only an hour away. My suggestion to prospective students is to get a car as it will make everything easier. What I found unique about Cranfield is that in this tiny spot, in the middle of the country, you have a diverse group of people from every corner of the world. I always call it a mini-United Nations. It is bizarre to think that such a place exists. In this village you also have world-leading experts on aerospace, manufacturing, energy, water, agriculture, management – the list goes on! That’s what I love about Cranfield University, the tight-knit community of people that are pushing the boundaries of knowledge. It’s at this place that you can have the best discussion or debate and interdisciplinary collaboration that might be difficult in a larger university. The support from the university is also great. I felt that I received the support I needed to grow, and it has led to being recognised as one of the grantees at on a Emerging Space Leaders (ESL) programmes from the IAF. The IAF was founded in 1951 when scientists from the field of space research gathered in an attempt to ensure dialogue between the space nations, regardless of the political turmoil. It has since hosted the International Astronautical Congress (IAC). During the space race, it was one of the few places where East could meet West. If you are in the space industry, then this is the place to be. It is great to be part of the programme. We had the opportunity to meet with great World Leaders discussing and probing the future of the space industry. I am truly honoured and humbled to have been selected as a grantee for the ESL programme. It is great to stand side-by-side with fellow grantees that have achieved so much in their respective fields. For the rest of the blog, I will share pictures and captions. Hopefully it can give you a flavour of the IAC 2019 and ESL programme! ![]() (Left) 27th United Nation/IAF Workshop on Space Technology for Socio-Economic Benefits. (Right) Simonetta Di Pippo, Director General of the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA). ![]() Apollo 11 crew honoured with the IAF 2019 World Space Award ![]() (Left) “3G” Diversity Luncheon with the IAF president Dr Jean-Yves Le Gall who is also the president of CNES, the French Space Agency. (Right) Bernard Foing who is also known as the father of SMART-1, a satellite programme that revolutionised the space programme at the European Space Agency (one of my all-time favourite satellites). ![]() (Left) Virgin Galactic spacesuit. (Right) Jeff Bezos awarded the IAF Excellence in Industry Award at the IAC 2019. ![]() IAF ESL 2019 award programme ![]() Presenting BAMMsat research in one of the IAC A2.5 technical sessions ![]() We also had fun with everyone from all corners of the world! Thanks for reading and I hope you enjoyed the blog! |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Top tips for logging in to library databases from off campus |
|
We know that our databases can be confusing. They are all produced by different companies, they all have different interfaces, and some of them even look different depending on whether you are accessing them from on or off campus! This blog post is intended to give you some tips on how to access some of our key databases from off campus – very handy if you are leaving Cranfield over the Christmas break. When you are on campus, most of our databases will recognise your location automatically. This means you don’t have to do anything else to prove you are a member of Cranfield University, and they will give you immediate access to the content. However, if you are off campus you need to follow a few extra steps to prove your identity and access our subscription. Most of our databases require an OpenAthens log in. This means that once you have logged in to one resource using OpenAthens your details will be remembered across many other databases in the same session. You’ll still need to click on the correct log in option for each one to gain full access to it, but you won’t need to enter your details again. Once you sign out of your computer your session will end, and you will need to log in again next time you start a new session. The main thing to remember is that you must access library resources from your library’s website via https://library.cranfield.ac.uk/. Do NOT use the extranet (VPN). From your library homepage you can find database links in either ‘Databases A-Z’, or an appropriate subject guide. (The screenshot below shows the Kings Norton Library homepage. The layout is the same for the MIRC homepage but it uses the heading ‘Online business resources’ rather than ‘Subject guides’.) ![]() These are our helpsheets for accessing the most popular databases from off campus: Please let us know if there are others you need help with and we will grow the list! |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: A sit down with Chloe Sutcliffe |
|
Can you introduce yourself? I’m Chloe, I’m a social scientist working as a Post Doctoral Research Fellow at Cranfield. I’ve been here 3 years and I’m currently working on a project looking at ways of increasing resilience to water-related risks in the UK’s fresh fruit and vegetable supply. What drives your research? My first degree was in Social Anthropology. I’ve always been interested in how other people think and see the world. I find it fascinating that there are so many people in the world and everybody has their own unique point of view. Having worked in horticulture for a few years before doing my PhD, I’m also very passionate about the environment, and I especially love growing and eating fruit and veg, so this project has been pretty much perfect for me! There are things that are evident about the way society operates currently that are not sustainable for the future. So working out how people can understand each other better or be better connected in order to work towards addressing some of those issues is a key part of what I do. Can you tell me a bit about your research? So this research is one of a number of different projects that have been funded by the UK Research and Innovation Global Food Security Programme looking at the resilience of the UK’s food system in a global context. Initially we used trade and production data to look at all the fruit and veg coming into the UK from around the world and then we calculated the water scarcity footprint (WSF) for that fruit and veg. So, we looked at how much water is used to irrigate different fruit and veg crops in different areas, and combined that with a value for water scarcity in the areas where those crops are being grown. We were then able to come up with figures to show how the water scarcity impacts of the nation’s fruit and veg purchasing and sourcing habits have been changing over time. As well as that global overview, the other parts of the project have looked in more detail at production and supply chains. We’ve done two case studies at a farm level, one with fruit and veg growers in the UK, and one with South African farmers growing fruit for export. These case studies have aimed to understand how growers perceive water risks and make irrigation decisions. We’ve also interviewed stakeholders from across the fruit and veg supply chain. Cranfield has partnered with several of other institutions to undertake this whole project; the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford, the [University of East Anglia, and NIAB-EMR in the UK, and the Institute of Natural Resources in South Africa, so I’ve had the chance to get to know researchers and consultants with a range of different skills, academic backgrounds and expertise, so it’s been really interesting professionally. What have you done with all this data? Based on all this we designed a boardgame which we’ve played with people working for different supply chain organisations as a way to help them think about how water risks get moved around the whole system. The idea is that in the process of playing the game they may come up with ideas about how they could co-operate or manage things differently to reduce the potential negative impacts of water risks. If people do what is in their own best short-term interests it often has a negative impact elsewhere in the system. So encouraging everyone to think a bit more about the system as a whole can help them make choices that will build resilience. And getting different people together to play the game is of course good fun! ![]() Image of the board game we designed What are the biggest challenges? Coming from a social science background you are in the minority at Cranfield as most people are from the natural sciences. This gives you opportunities but it’s also a challenge as your knowledge and your scientific expertise are sometimes viewed differently. A lot of the research done at Cranfield is quite applied, developing new technologies or ways of doing things. This new technology needs to be acceptable to people and meet their needs so it can be taken up by society at a wider level so there is quite a lot of scope for social scientists to contribute to funding bids. What do you really enjoy about your job? It’s great to be doing a job where I get to meet and interview different people and make sense out of their thinking about their role in the world. I also get to write, which I really enjoy doing. Because I tend to work on interdisciplinary projects that employ mixed methods I get quite a lot of variety in terms of the data processing and analysis that I do. It’s a good mix of number-crunching, which I find satisfying, and then dealing with the messier, more complex nature of how individuals perceive and construct stories about the issues that are important to them, which I find really interesting. It’s then challenging but rewarding to find ways of bringing together the different types of data I work with in order to communicate research findings. I also really like the people that I work with. Cranfield is full of talented and driven people who also mostly happen to be very friendly and down to earth! In particular it has been good to meet and work on developing bids for new research projects with people from very different disciplinary backgrounds, and work out how skills from different disciplines can be brought together to address real world problems, which is one of the things I think Cranfield as an institution is especially good at doing. What else do you do in your role? I teach lectures on two MSc modules and I’ve also supervised MSc students writing their dissertation projects. It isn’t a massive part of my role but it’s been great to have the opportunity to develop my teaching and mentoring abilities and to engage with students who are developing their skills in new directions. I find the postgraduate students very focused, they have made the choice to come and study here as they know it will be useful to them in their careers, so it’s quite different to teaching undergrads. One of the modules I lecture on is ‘Drought and Water Scarcity’, part of the Environmental Water Management MSc. My lecture focuses on the relationships between water scarcity and food security and explores some of the different research methods that can be used to help understand water risks in food systems. The second module I teach on is from the Future Food Sustainability MSc and is called ‘Water and Sustainable Agrifood Systems’, so this year we may take the fruit and veg board game to play it with the students. I feel like I’m bringing a slightly different perspective with the lectures I give as they are much more social science focused. It’s an opportunity to encourage students to look at things in a way that may be new to them. |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Life as a Strategic Marketing student at Cranfield University. |
|
Hello there! My name is Andrea, and I’m an Italian student enrolled in the MSc in Strategic Marketing at Cranfield University. I have just finished my exams and about to fly back home to spend the Christmas break with my family. It has been three intense and eventful months, in which I learned a lot and got to meet great people. This is also the first time I am writing a blog, so please bare with me, and I hope you enjoy my summary of term one at Cranfield University. My journey at Cranfield University began last May when I decided to visit the university before enrolling into my program. I reached out to the School of Management, which organised me a tour of the campus and a private meeting with the Strategic Marketing Course Director. The staff were super nice, and I was impressed by how big the campus is and the many facilities it offers. The meeting was also very enlightening: Ahmed gave me great insights about the program and convinced me that studying at Cranfield was the right choice. The masters course looks at different aspects of marketing such as branding, digital marketing and customer relationship management to give students an all-around and deep knowledge to become successful marketers. The best bit about the program is its practical focus: throughout the semester, I worked on a sales plan for a live client as part of a group project, and my role was to develop a sustainable business model to help the company increase its revenue. However, my favourite class was “Retailing and Omnichannel Management” because we studied how retailers manage their store space and atmospheric stimuli to create a pleasant shopping experience for customers. Overall, I am very satisfied about the subjects from term 1 and I’m looking forward to starting next semester to learn about managing brands and digital marketing. ![]() During the semester, I attended events held by marketing professionals and managers from big companies who came to Cranfield to provide students with real-life examples and applications of what we are studying. My favourite seminar was the one about the fashion industry trends held by the market research firm Mintel. The masterclass revolved around consumer behaviour and the new market trends and challenges, which I found extremely interesting and insightful. Aside from course-based events, there are lots of activities organised by the Cranfield Students’ Association (CSA) throughout the year, such as discos and trips. However, I have spent most of my free time at the gym (I am quite a gym freak myself ahah) and in London because I love the city and have friends who live there. Speaking of friends, I have met some really cool people so far. There are many international students in my course, which makes the learning experience much more stimulating and cross-cultural. We often work in groups where everyone shares their own insights and ideas based on their experience and culture. These activities also helped me to get to know my classmates, and it was truly thanked to this that I met Jackie and Christina, who are now my closest friends. We have made some trips across the UK during the semester, and we usually go shopping together since we are very passionate about fashion. As far as my accommodation is concerned, I rented a room in a shared house at Cranfield village. I wanted to live on-campus, but unfortunately, the dormitory was already full by the time I applied. At first, I was worried that living off-campus would prevent me from meeting new people and attending events, but I couldn’t be more wrong: the village is only a 5-minutes bus ride or 15 minutes by bike from the university, which means I can quickly go there whenever I want without relying on the bus schedule. Plus, I made friends with students living at the village too, who I often hang out with in the weekends. Not to mention that the best advantage of living in a small village is that everything is within walking distance – no need to go through the hassle of catching the tube or the bus to get to the nearest supermarket. I would like to finish off this post by showing you this sunset picture I took from my room window last month. It was quite a nice and rare event for UK standards, and it proves that the weather here can still surprise you sometimes. ![]() Hope you enjoyed this blog post about my experience at Cranfield University so far. Term 2 is about to start, and I’m looking forward to keeping you posted about my journey. More posts are coming up, so stay tuned! |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: My journey to Cranfield |
|
Hey, my name is Joseph Kobina Ofori, and I am a Commonwealth Shared Scholar from Ghana, West Africa. Back home in Ghana I have always loved the idea of studying in the United Kingdom. I had been contemplating on which university to pursue my masters degree for some time until one day, while I was scrolling through a web page in Ghana, I came across Cranfield University! Upon searching Cranfield University’s website, I developed an enthusiasm to study an MSc in a food related course. I believed that, studying an MSc at Cranfield University was a great opportunity for me to broaden my horizon and attain the knowledge of the highest in terms of the nitty-gritty of food sciences. This was also an opportunity for me to interact with world class Doctors and Professors. I saw that Cranfield University’s reputation was one of the best in the UK with high educational standards in postgraduate studies. Furthermore, they have substantial research expertise in food coupled with wide range of career opportunities. I applied to study an MScin Future Food Sustainability as well applying for a scholarship too. A few weeks after applying I received a letter from Cranfield University informing me of my offer, I was amazed because of the fast pace in which my application was processed. I got nominated by Cranfield University for the prestigious commonwealth award which would help me pursue my MSc, although there were a lot of potential students also competing for the same award. Thank you Cranfield University and Commonwealth Scholarship Commission for selecting me as the winner of this award! I arrived in the UK, on 30th September 2019, I felt a breeze of fresh air on the campus and I said to myself “Wow! I am finally at Cranfield University!!”. My first week on campus was an induction, and it was full of fun activities. I was privileged to be part of the Welcome Event for all fresher’s at the Sport Hall. It was a meeting of students from all walks of life with different cultures and backgrounds, this was a chance to interact and make friends. The event was interesting and there were games we played to get to know other students in the Agrifood department. My course and Programme Directors were so friendly and interactive. I won by being the first student to know everyone using a simple questionnaire. The induction week made me feel very exhilarated, welcomed and excited for the year ahead. ![]() As part of our induction week, we visited G’s Naturally Fresh. We were given the opportunity to learn through practical’s, several processes in food production through food engineering to the finished product and how critical it was to abide by Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) in food production chain. Moreover, I understood sustainability strategies that they have adopted to ensure that the company produces food in a more sustainable environment. ![]() So far, my first week on campus has been fulfilling and I hope the modules also continue to be the same. |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: How practical sessions are revving up our automotive MScs |
|
Here at Cranfield, we pride ourselves on the strong practical vein of our courses. We understand that true knowledge comes not just from listening, reading and writing, but from doing. Research shows that practical leaning boosts individuals’ know-how and proficiency and makes them feel that their education is more relevant – moreover, it has been shown to improve self-esteem in the workplace, perhaps because individuals feel better equipped to overcome challenges. But what does this look like in practice and what do our students really think about this approach? ![]() Real-life research on the automotive MScs During the last week of November, students studying our Automotive Engineering and Automotive Mechatronics MScs took part in two practical sessions, as part of their Vehicle Dynamics module. The first session was a handling test, which took place on our Multi-User Environment for Autonomous Vehicle Innovation (MUEAVI) road, and the second session was a hands-on look at suspension designs in our mechatronics laboratory. Describing the first practical session, Dr Efstathios Velenis said: “The vehicle handling practical at MUEAVI aims at demonstrating current approaches of vehicle instrumentation and standard techniques of objective evaluation of vehicle handling performance. The test procedure includes a variety of dynamic and steady-state cornering manoeuvres. The tests are repeated for different configurations of the suspension. ![]() “Post-processing of the data is presented and the effects of the different suspension modifications on the cornering performance of the vehicle are studied and discussed in class. The focus is on the interpretation of the observed behaviours based on the theory covered in the module.” This was a jam-packed day that saw students actively involved in the sessions (despite the bleak weather!) and allowed them to apply their learning in an everyday setting. MSc student Georges Sayes commented: “These practical sessions offer a different approach to studying, which is better than a purely theoretical one. We can really understand the different technologies that are employed and the benefits of each of them. “Learning only the theory does not allow you to really understand the fundamental functioning of different suspension designs, for example. “During the handling session outside, we could apply what we had learned the day before. By seeing how the vehicle could perform on the track, we were able to validate our calculations on real vehicles. “Through these sessions, we get closer to the automotive industry and acquire a better and deeper understanding.” Another MSc student, Sreeram Santosh Vasamsetty, said: “Cranfield offers a huge number of practical sessions compared to other universities and these sessions are really impressive and industry-orientated. We deal with real-life situations. “AVEC has great facilities and, for me, the most interesting part of the day was the vehicle handling session. “Automotive companies want to hire students from Cranfield because we’ve dealt with real-life scenarios.” ![]() Our automotive students have plenty more to look forward to throughout the rest of the academic year, including continuing to work on their group design project. Next year also marks the 60th anniversary of our Advanced Vehicle Engineering Centre (AVEC), so it’s an exciting time to be studying an automotive MSc at Cranfield. |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Cranfield and Exeter’s journey to the European Space Technology Centre (ESTEC) |
|
We are a team of seven students, five from the Cranfield MSc Astronautics and Space Engineering, one Cranfield’s PhD student in the space group and one PhD student from Exeter University (our worm experts-more later) in the UK. We are really pleased to announce our selection at the student project REXUS/BEXUS organize by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and the Swedish National Space Agency (SNSA). And thanks to a collaboration with the European Space Agency (ESA), this program is available for students in other European countries. This story is to share our recent participation at the REXUS/BEXUS selection workshop where we defended our student experiment proposal to be flown on a large stratospheric balloon flight (remember Felix Baumgartner, the Red Bull jump from edge of space). As part of his PhD studies, Aqeel Shamsul, and his supervisor (Prof David Cullen) with fellow students submitted a proposal to fly a version of a BAMMsat payload. BAMMsat stands for Bioscience, Astrobiology, Medicine and Material on CubeSat which is capable of hosting a range of biological payload. We aim to increase the technology readiness level of the BAMMsat payload to position us for better bidding of future space missions. Our vision is to enhance the access to space for future science on complex biological organisms. This knowledge is critical for the understanding of the impact of space environment over life on Earth to enable long-duration deep-space crewed missions. Most importantly, it also furthers our understanding of life on Earth which could be beneficial to human. For this flight, we proposed a repackaged version of the laboratory breadboard into a 2U CubeSat format and hosting complex life form like the C. Elegans (worms) as an example of a biological specimen. We aim to integrate that breadboard into a 2U pressurize compatible with the CubeSat standard and launch it on a BEXUS stratospheric balloon to test our ability to handle late access operation on a launch vehicle as this could be an issue. Indeed a launch campaign involving an alive biological payload for an orbital flight will be tricky. We will also test our ability to keep a nominal pressure and temperature inside the payload to keep the C.Elegans worms alive and finally our ability to observe and study the C.Elegans. ![]() BAMMsat on BEXUS team from left to right: Migel Martinez de Bujo, Adrien Bolliand, Aqeel Shamsul, Amin Chabi, Mat Zalasiewics, Mike Cooke, Giovanni Sinclair. On 28th November 2019, we presented at ESTEC, the technical headquarter of the European Space Agency and defended our proposal plan to fly on the REXUS/BEXUS programme. The REXUS/BEXUS is a programme under a bilateral Agency Agreement between the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and the Swedish National Space Agency (SNSA). The Swedish share of the payload has been made available to students from other European countries through a collaboration with the European Space Agency (ESA). EuroLaunch, a cooperation between the Esrange Space Center of SSC and the Mobile Rocket Base (MORABA) of DLR, is responsible for the campaign management and operations of the launch vehicles. Experts from DLR, SSC, ZARM and ESA provide technical support to the student teams throughout the project. REXUS and BEXUS are launched from SSC, Esrange Space Center in northern Sweden. A successful flight would greatly increase the technology readiness of the system and demonstrate to scientific community the capability of the BAMMsat platform to study complex organisms in space either as a standalone CubeSat or on-board larger spacecraft such as Bion satellite or the International Space Station. It would open a new range of capability for biological science experiment in space. The CubeSat could be launched in a lunar orbit outside of the protection of the terrestrial magnetic field or Van Allen Belt, it could be bolted on to the ISS or the upcoming Lunar Gateway or launch to any orbit where we want to study the impact on life. It may seem at first sight it is obvious to perform such research, and you may think that it has already been done. An example would be a recent experiment on the ISS such as the Molecular Muscle Experiment (MME) run by Dr Tim Ethridge From Exeter University (Mike, one of our team member is also on the MME team!). However, access to space is still limited partly due to the launch cost, and also development cost of the hardware. We aim to improve access to space by reducing cost using commercial off the shelves component. To date, there has been limited study in space involving complex life form, especially on-board a bioCubeSat. We think that to confidently send astronauts for long duration mission to a Moon or Mars mission; we desperately need more data on the impact of not only microgravity but also of cosmic radiation. On the 25th November 2019, we flew to Amsterdam, did some team building and, and on the 26th we sat at the REXUS/BEXUS student program presentation at the ERASMUS building full of legendary space hardware and model. This REXUS/BEXUS panel will select some teams from universities across Europe to fly their hardware either on a sounding rocket (REXUS) or a stratospheric balloon (BEXUS). It is truly an incredible opportunity for students to be able to run a project in real space mission like environment, going to all the process of space mission from design to launch in just one year and meet the representative of space organisations in Europe. ![]() Lunch at the legendary ESTEC cafeteria, so many great options of tasty foods! From left to right: Amin Chabi, Mike Cooke, Adrien Bolliand, unknown ESTEC dude, Miguel Martinez, Aqeel Shamsul, and Giovanni Sinclair. We would make a perfect boy band! ![]() Figure 5: Adrien Bolliand presenting the outreach plan We presented our hardware on the 28th there along with 80 students in, front of a jury composed of executives from European Space Agency, DLR, SNSA, ESA, ZRAM, SSC, MORABA. They announced our selection for the launch of October 2020 this 9th of December. We will continue to post on this page as new development appears and keep everyone informed. You can follow un on the platform of your choice: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and you can get more information at our website: bammsat.com ![]() Picture of the team after our presentation. From left to right: Migel Martinez de Bujo, Giovanni Sinclair, Adrien Bolliand, Mat Zalasiewics holding Paxi, Amin Chabi, Mike Cooke and Aqeel Shamsul. |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Changes to Saturday staffing in MIRC |
|
From Saturday 11 January, the Management Information and Resource Centre (MIRC) will be staffed every Saturday by our Casual Assistants Team (CAT). We have already trialled this approach in MIRC on occasional Saturdays since August 2019. Our CAT colleagues are trained to help you with locating stock, borrowing books, renewals, reservations and general enquiries. They will not be able to help you use the databases, carry out literature searches or provide referencing advice so please contact your MIRC Information Specialist during the week if you need any support in these areas. The Library Service has successfully provided an unstaffed weekend service in the Kings Norton Library for two years, and the MIRC staffing changes are intended to create parity in service provision. We continually monitor usage and enquiries, and will be reviewing the new policy so please let us know what you think. |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: Performance Reporting Measures vs Performance Management Measures – Part 3 |
|
Pass-Fail (Or are they Fix-Fail?) Measures You may have read my previous blogs comparing Performance Reporting Measures vs Performance Management Measures. Performance reporting is littered with measures that may appear to carry meaning for some people, but in our observations, have been misleading and impenetrable to many. And certainly don’t help understanding nor how to improve! Here are some examples of reporting measures that we introduced previously:
This week we’ll look at % completed within some timeframe (or % of a population meeting some constraint / target). Examples are: % A&E Attendants seen in 4 hours or under; % Calls Answered within 15 seconds; % Trains Arriving Within 5 minutes of Schedule; % of Chocolate Bars Above A Target Weight. You’ll probably have some examples of your own. So we already know from the previous 2 blogs on this subject that % measures present problems which we will not revisit here. So if “% A&E Attendants seen in 4 hours or under” is a performance reporting measure, what is a the equivalent performance management measure? It’s “Throughput Time from Arrival to Admission, Transfer or Discharge” (using the NHS England A&E Attendances and Emergency Admissions Monthly Return Definitions, November 2015). For brevity we’ll just call this Throughput Time – and this is the equivalent to all those % success within Timeframe measures above. Regarding Target Weight Measure above – just measure Chocolate Bar Weight. For those who have followed our blogs over the past few years, you will understand that one of the biggest problems in managing business processes is variation. It would be very rare to get the same number of people coming into A&E every day of the year. It would be very rare for every one of them to be seen and assessed in exactly the same time in every case. You can learn an awful lot about how well a business is performing by looking at the variation over time in the performance management measure – Throughput Time. The problem is, it is impossible to get any national statistics around A&E Throughput Time! So we’ve shown some charts from a different context – around biological products delivered to a Health System to illustrate the power of being able to examine Throughput Time: Issue No. 1: No Understanding of the System or Process Capability:
![]() This measure is a Pass-Fail measure. You’re either seen in 4 hours or under (Pass), or not (Fail). All you can see from the chart above is a worsening of Pass-Fail ratio. It does not answer the more important question for the customer (patient) – how long is it likely to take? We have no idea if most of the attendants in A&E are seen within 1 min (which is perhaps fantastic) or 3 hrs 59 mins (perhaps inconvenient). There is a Pass-Fail measure around 12 hrs as well, but again we have no idea if most of these customers (patients) are seen in 4 hrs 1 min (perhaps inconvenient) or 11 hrs 59 mins (perhaps problematic).
![]() This chart shows Throughput Time for biological product delivered to a Health System. This is strongly seasonal with peaks around January. At this point, no more insightful than the previous chart above. However, the Throughput Time chart is actually tracking the monthly average Throughput Time. Within each month there is a large degree of variation, which we can drill down into. Shown below as a histogram (in this case we have selected the month of January 2012): ![]() Now we have something useful! And the profile is likely to be similar to that of A&E Wait Times. The vertical bars are the number of deliveries within a specific time-bucket ranging from 2-3 days to 50-51 days. The pink curve is the “ideal” (but see previous blog on Continuous Improvement) curve if the delivery process was not under stress. In the chart above, we can see that there is a significant spread in delivery times from as little as 1 day to as much as 50 or more days. We can ask what is the cause of this spread (or variation), and drill down further? In the chart above, we also see a huge spike just below and at 35 days – this is because the biological product has to be destroyed when older than 35 days. And it’s highly likely the A&E Wait Times also has a spike just under and at 4 hours. The size of this spike gives you the ability to see how much the system is creaking to deliver 4 hours and under Wait Times. If there was no (or only a minor) spike, it would mean the system was operating largely in control. Issue No. 2: Drives some organisations to “play the system” by “fixing” results:
![]() The only other useful-ish chart we can get out of this reporting measure is the Total Attendances with Wait Times greater than 4 hours. This is of course increasing seasonally with winter peaks. You have no idea how many attendants waited more than 4 hours because A&E decided there was no chance of achieving target (in this case 95%), and so left the attendant for longer than necessary in order to push others through which they knew would be much easier/faster to handle.
![]() When you see this kind of spike indicating a system under stress, it is highly likely there will be some gaming going on to hit the target. Instead, by drilling down, you can start to determine drivers of this spike, and then work on corrective action. Issue no. 3: Does little towards improving customer (patient) experience:
Ideally, you’d want to start drilling down, say, by hospital, by cohort (dependent on e.g. attendant age group, location, socio-economic group, etc.), by problem type etc. This would be to understand where to focus improvement effort first. But we saw from a previous blog on this subject, that drilling down into %’s can give some highly unpredictable results.
![]() Here we can safely drill down to establish drivers (in this case by Region) of extended Throughput Time (in this case the Region on the left – Northern), and continue drilling down further by geography, or by other characteristics, to enable specific improvement action to be taken / tested. Another performance management measure is Work In Progress (or stuff stuck in the business process or system). In fact, WIP drives Throughput Time. In A&E the equivalent of WIP are the people sitting waiting in seating areas, people waiting on trolleys in corridors etc. But we’ll look at WIP another time. It would definitely pique Dilbert’s interest! And next time in this series, we’ll look at complicated measure combinations. The example will be from supply-chain and you’d be flabbergasted if you knew how much resource, in one organisation, this measure consumed without an iota of meaningful understanding coming from it! Dilbert would have a field day! |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: 15 January – Metrics in the Journal Citation Reports (webinar) |
|
Journal impact factors: navigating the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Wednesday 15 January, 1-2pm Join Emma Turner and Clare Humphries, Information Specialists in the Kings Norton Library, on a gentle walk through some of the metrics features in the JCR. The webinar will consist of a short presentation, followed by discussion and your questions on the topic. There will also be time for you to ask us any burning research support-related questions you might have! You will be able to access the webinar both on and off campus, but you will need to book a place through the DATES system on the intranet. The webinar is open to any Cranfield staff member or student interested in research. Bookyour place. This forms part of a series of monthly webinars covering topics such as predatory publishing, Open Access, setting up an ORCID, and using CORD. Find out about future sessions. Image by StockSnap from Pixabay |
| FROM Cranfield SOM Blogs: From China to Cranfield |
|
I am a Chinese student currently studying Water and Wastewater Engineering MSc at Cranfield University. The very first impression of Cranfield is the well-arranged campus with its wonderful natural environment, which is entirely different from the universities in big cities. ![]() Since it’s the first time I have studied abroad, it’s really a big challenge for me to learn to live by myself, fit a totally new cultural environment and improve my oral English. Fortunately, during the registration week, enthusiastic staff really gave me a sense of family and relieved my anxiety. ![]() When it comes to my study experience in Cranfield, I will always say that my classmates are so amazing. Many of my classmates have already been experts in the industry. During discussion sessions, I was astonished by their standard pronunciation, abundant knowledge, creative thinking and prudent attitude. I instantly recognised that I was surrounded by people who had so much knowledge on a topic I knew little about. However, I soon came to realize that being surrounded by such amazing people, will only benefit me throughout my time at Cranfield and contribute to the incredible year I have ahead, both socially and academically. |
Success stories and strategies from high-scoring candidates.