Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 15:53 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 15:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vusal808
Joined: 26 Jan 2023
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
6
 [2]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 6
Kudos: 6
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,205
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,205
Kudos: 1,574
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vusal808
Joined: 26 Jan 2023
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 6
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mysterymanrog
User avatar
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Jan 2022
Last visit: 06 Feb 2026
Posts: 791
Own Kudos:
714
 [3]
Given Kudos: 559
Location: Italy
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 791
Kudos: 714
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's important to realize what you are doing in an assumption question.
Consider the following argument:
Mike is the best deer hunter in New York City. There will be a deer hunting competition in New York City on Friday next week. Since Mike is the best deer hunter in New York City, he will surely win the competition.
Although this argument seems quite simple and logical, there are so many assumptions underlying it.
For example, the author has assumed that Mike will attend the competition. How can Mike if he does not attend? The author has also assumed that the competition will only contain people from New York City (what if Carl, the best hunter from New Jersey, attends the competition? Is Mike sure to win then?) or alternatively, that Mike is better than anyone else attending the competition. The author has assumed that the deer hunting competition will be judged on deer hunting -> What if the judges are corrupt?
The list goes on and on. There are infinitely many assumptions packed into this tiny argument.

An example answer choice to this passage would be:
A) Mike is in New York City on Friday, and will attend the competition.
This might be for an easier level question, where it is easy to see how it links to the assumption.

A harder level question might have something like:
A) Mike recently went to the doctor, and the doctor has assured him that he will not be ill in the following week.
This also relates to the assumption of Mike attending the competition, since if he is ill he will not be able to attend. But this is much more "roundabout" than the first version.

Knowing the above, then it is clear that while doing GMAT/LSAT assumption questions, your task is to find "what is unstated". You need to find where the author makes "jumps" in the reasoning. Obviously, you do not have time to list every single assumption of an argument, since there can really be infinitely many, however it is good practice to pick a question, and write down all the assumptions so you can train yourself to spot them. Assumptions can be big or small, and there is really no limit.

A good technique to learn is the negation technique.
You can invert the answer choices, and see how they impact the argument.

In our silly example, suppose we inverted the easy version of A:
Mike is in New York City on Friday, and he will attend the competition -> Mike is NOT in New York City on Friday and he will NOT attend the competition.
It becomes clear, that through the negation technique, that if A is somehow false, then the authors argument falls apart (If Mike does not attend, there is no way for him to win).

It also works for the harder version:
Mike recently went to the doctor, and the doctor has assured him that he will not be ill in the following week -> Mike recently went to the doctor, and the doctor has assured him that he WILL be ill in the following week.
Negating the hard version, it also becomes clear that it is an important assumption. If Mike is sick, there is a good chance he will not attend the concert and thus not be able to win.

In essence, to get better at assumption questions you will want to:
1) Understand what an assumption is, and how to spot them in passages
2) Learn how to apply the negation technique, so that you can be certain of your answer choice. The negation technique, at high level questions, can become quite tricky to apply, so it is important to practice.

Hope this helps!
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,472
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,472
Kudos: 5,641
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi vusal808.

Since the assumption has to fill a gap in the argument, maybe it will help for you to get better at identifying gaps.

A great way to see the gaps very clearly is to ask yourself what the difference is between the evidence and the conclusion. For example, consider the following argument from the TTP course:

    MowGreen, a company that uses sustainable methods to maintain lawns, has been expanding quickly, and its services are now available in many areas of the country. However, given the state of the economy in the Drawnville area, MowGreen would not be able to operate profitably there. Therefore, one can be sure that MowGreen will not expand its operations into the Drawnville area any time soon.

Notice the difference between the evidence and the conclusion.

The evidence is "MowGreen would not be able to operate profitably there."

The conclusion is "MowGreen will not expand its operations into the Drawnville area."

So, the evidence is about profitability whereas the conclusion is about expanding operations. The argument has jumped from one to the other. So, the correct answer will connect those two things.

For some other insights that could help Assumption questions click for you, see the following video.

Moderators:
192 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
473 posts