It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 10:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Crunch-o cookies have twice as much flavor for your money as

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2009
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 9

Location: India

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2010, 00:33
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

20% (01:11) correct 80% (01:05) wrong based on 40 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Crunch-o cookies have twice as much flavor for your money as Choc-o cookies, and we show you how. A single Crunch-o cookie is twice as large as a single Choc-o cookie, and the larger the cookie, the more the flavor.
Which of the following, if true, would undermine the persuasive appeal of the above advertisement?
(I) A packet of Choc-o contains twice as many cookies as a packet of Crunch-o at the same price.
(II) Choc-o has more concentrated flavor than Crunch-o.
(III) Despite being double in size a Crunch-o cookie weighs only 50% as much as a Choc-o Cookie.

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II and III

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 142

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2010, 09:48
IMO A
Though the ques is kind of absurd. bt still for an answer A is the one for me.

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2010, 09:59
I will go with answer C whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2010
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2010, 11:18
This is a tricky one. I would say C.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 195

Kudos [?]: 548 [0], given: 6

Location: Manchester UK

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2010, 13:57
I would opt for B. The appeal says that larger the cookie the more flavour it has.

Crunch-o cookies have twice as much flavor for your money as Choc-o cookies, and we show you how. A single Crunch-o cookie is twice as large as a single Choc-o cookie, and the larger the cookie, the more the flavor.
Which of the following, if true, would undermine the persuasive appeal of the above advertisement?
(I) A packet of Choc-o contains twice as many cookies as a packet of Crunch-o at the same price.
Appeal does not mention about the quantity of the cookie present in the size. Its just states that larger the size more the flavour.

(II) Choc-o has more concentrated flavor than Crunch-o.
This is the obvious choice

(III) Despite being double in size a Crunch-o cookie weighs only 50% as much as a Choc-o Cookie.
Again the appeal does not mention anything about the weight so this is out of scope.

Whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 548 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2009
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 9

Location: India

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2010, 22:13
The Explanation given is like (source- crackgmat):
Put in other words, the question implies, 'which of the following, if true, work against the claims of the advertisement?'
If statement I is correct, Choc-o has more value for money then Crunch-o.
If statement II is correct, then Choc-o also has more flavor, because concentration of the flavor is a more important factor than the size of the cookie.
Finally, volume of the cookie is not the criterion on which the flavor is based, it is the mass (or weight).
Thus, each of the three statements detract from the appeal of the above advertisement.
Hence (E) is the correct answer.

I AM REALLY CONFUSED WITH THIS EXPLANATION. CAN ANYONE HELP?

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 142

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2010, 00:18
Thats an absurd & out of the world explanation... i hope these kind of ques dsnt cm in actuals

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 3

Location: Streamwood IL
Schools: Kellogg(Evening),Booth (Evening)
WE 1: 5 Years

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2010, 12:23
E looks good to me.
_________________

Rock On

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2010, 22:19
The larger the cookie, the more the flavor. I go with D as it supports density and concentration.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 236

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2010, 03:20
I would've said C: I and II only.
The argument is for size and more flavor, henceforth. Mass and volume would be an assumption, because we have no idea if the flavor is coming from one ingredient or many ingredients.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Intern
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 33

Schools: Wake Forest Evening
WE 1: ~12 years total

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2010, 11:39
I think B. II only

Quote:
(I) A packet of Choc-o contains twice as many cookies as a packet of Crunch-o at the same price.
Number of cookies in a pack doesn't affect the flavor. If you eat an entire pack yes, but it is assumed you are eating just one cookie. (?) (I am not 100% sold on this one though.)

Quote:
(II) Choc-o has more concentrated flavor than Crunch-o.
The flavor of Choc-o is stronger than the other.

Quote:
(III) Despite being double in size a Crunch-o cookie weighs only 50% as much as a Choc-o Cookie.
Weight doesn't really matter in terms of flavor. A heavier marshmallow is not always better than a lighter fluffier one.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 33

Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2010, 16:01
C seems right for me

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 154

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2010, 15:59
B for me .
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 793 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2010, 17:53
B for me. (II)

I and III are refering to the size of the packet and the weight of the cookie. However, argument is talking only about the size of the cookie and the flavor of the cookie.

Kudos [?]: 793 [0], given: 6

Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2010, 23:54
I chose E based on real world point of view (which i'm not supposed to in GMAT???)
(I) A packet of Choc-o contains twice as many cookies as a packet of Crunch-o at the same price.
i get the same amount of flavor per packet, so I could end up buying either one
(II) Choc-o has more concentrated flavor than Crunch-o.
twice as large and twice as much flavor (crunch-o) vs more concentrated flavor of Choc-o
i might get the same amount of flavor from either packet
(III) Despite being double in size a Crunch-o cookie weighs only 50% as much as a Choc-o Cookie.
weight of crunch-o = weight of choc-o
either one is fine , same \$\$ per value
these are the rules I follow when doing groceries..what can I say?

the point is : I get the same bang for the bucks, as opposed to what the ad said

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2010, 05:14
IMO C

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 33

WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2010, 01:48
I thought of E first, but selected C. Got really confused !!!
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 33

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 194

Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2010, 10:18
I bet the answer is С because 3 is irrelevant. Weigh is not mentiones anywhere.

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 194

Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2010
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2010, 01:49
+1 with Pipp, I had the exact same reasoning

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2010, 10:21
A i think

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Crunch-o cookies have twice as much flavor for your money as

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.