GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Jun 2019, 20:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Deirdre: Many philosophers have argued that the goal of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 30 Apr 2016
Posts: 72
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Deirdre: Many philosophers have argued that the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2017, 07:50
1
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (01:53) correct 42% (02:05) wrong based on 182 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Deirdre: Many philosophers have argued that the goal of every individual is to achieve happiness—that is, the satisfaction derived from fully living up to one’s potential. They have also claimed that happiness is elusive and can be achieved only after years of sustained effort. But these philosophers have been unduly pessimistic, since they have clearly exaggerated the difficulty of being happy. Simply walking along the seashore on a sunny afternoon causes many people to experience feelings of happiness.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning flaw in Deirdre’s argument?

(A) It dismisses a claim because of its source rather than because of its content.
(B) It fails to take into account that what brings someone happiness at one moment may not bring that person happiness at another time.
(C) It allows the key term “happiness” to shift in meaning illicitly in the course of the argument.
(D) It presumes, without providing justification, that happiness is, in fact, the goal of life.
(E) It makes a generalization based on the testimony of a group whose views have not been shown to be representative.
Director
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 564
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Re: Deirdre: Many philosophers have argued that the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2017, 20:24
2
Top Contributor
1
Let us simplify the argument given --

PHILOSOPHERS' ARGUMENT --
Goal of an individual = Achieve happiness (= joy from living up to one's potential) + This happiness can be achieved only through years of sustained effort

AUTHOR'S ARGUMENT --
Walking on a seashore on sunny afternoon --> feelings of happiness --> Philosophers have exaggerated the difficulty of being happy --> their view is pessimistic

Note that this directly attacks the second part of the philosophers' argument -- "can be achieved only through years of effort" -- by giving an example.

We have been asked to find a flaw in the argument -- some kind of inconsistency that the author did not account for.

By comparing the two arguments, we can see that happiness in the author's argument = feeling of contentment BUT happiness in philosophers' argument = joy from living up to one's potential. Two very different things.

Which answer option states this? Option C.

Let us take a look at other answer options --

Option A - Incorrect
No. the author does not dismiss the philosophers' claim because it came from philosophers (=source).

Option B - Incorrect
This is probably not true. The author clearly states that it is momentary (experience on sunny afternoons, not at other times).
Moreover, this does not point a flaw in the author's reasoning --

Walking on a seashore on sunny afternoon --> feelings of happiness --> Philosophers have exaggerated the difficulty of being happy

This does not depend on whether the happiness is temporary or permanent. Only thing that matters is it can be achieved in a short amount of time and thus philosophers are wrong.

Option D - Incorrect

This pertains to the philosophers' argument. Not relevant.

Option E - Incorrect

"testimony of a group whose views have not been shown to be representative." -- no testimony is offered. No group is talked about. Also, we cannot infer anything about the representativeness of the group.
_________________
- CrackVerbal Prep Team

Register for the Free GMAT Kickstarter Course : http://bit.ly/2DDHKHq

Register for our Personal Tutoring Course : https://www.crackverbal.com/gmat/personal-tutoring/

Join the free 4 part GMAT video training series : http://bit.ly/2DGm8tR
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 69
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.99
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Re: Deirdre: Many philosophers have argued that the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2018, 00:31
Is there any official explanation provided for this question.
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 632
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Deirdre: Many philosophers have argued that the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2018, 06:19
ruchik,

MGMAT's LSAT Forum: https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/foru ... t2218.html
Powerscore Forum: https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=11718

Let me know if you have any other questions
_________________
D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

Need a CR tutor? PM me!
VP
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1279
Deirdre: Many philosophers have argued that the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2018, 12:39
Time taken 2 min. 55 sec

Deirdre: Many philosophers have argued that the goal of every individual is to achieve happiness—that is, the satisfaction derived from fully living up to one’s potential. They have also claimed that happiness is elusive and can be achieved only after years of sustained effort. But these philosophers have been unduly pessimistic, since they have clearly exaggerated the difficulty of being happy. Simply walking along the seashore on a sunny afternoon causes many people to experience feelings of happiness.

Deirdre, says that many philosophers claim that it takes many efforts to achieve a a desired level of happiness, but those philosophers exagerrate the difficulty level to beome happy. E.g walking along seashore can make a person happy.

(ok here one can note a shift in the term "happiness": one guy says it takes efforts to achieve happiness; another one says it can be experienced effortlessly, in other words "happiness" is interepreted differently by Deirdre)

So, what is the reasoning flaw in Deirdre’s argument ?

Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning flaw in Deirdre’s argument?

(A) It dismisses a claim because of its source rather than because of its content. ( No, it doesnt dismiss the claim of its source. Deidre didnt critisize philosophers, he just claimed it can be experienced effortlessly)

(B) It fails to take into account that what brings someone happiness at one moment may not bring that person happiness at another time.( This cant be assumed. It is not mentioned. What are not concerned with types of happiness. we are concerned with level of difficulty at which THAT happiness implied by philosophers, is achieved)

(C) It allows the key term “happiness” to shift in meaning illicitly in the course of the argument. (so, this is in line with my reasoning )

(D) It presumes, without providing justification, that happiness is, in fact, the goal of life. (out of scope. Goal of life -not mentioned)

(E) It makes a generalization based on the testimony of a group whose views have not been shown to be representative. (it doesnt make any generalization of any group. FALSE)
Deirdre: Many philosophers have argued that the goal of   [#permalink] 26 Dec 2018, 12:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by