Hi durant25,I get why E
feels off-topic: it talks about insect repellent, not the diseases or the mosquitoes directly. But in CR, "in scope" isn't about matching the topic words - it's about whether the choice
acts on the argument's conclusion. And here it does.
Track the conclusion first. The author says anyone with a weak immune system
should not travel to the Mosquito Coast. The unstated counter-move to that advice is obvious:
"Why avoid the place - can't I just protect myself instead?" The strongest protection would be a good insect repellent.
Now read E in that light:"The most effective chemical insect repellent has been shown to cause brain damage upon repeated application to the skin."This shuts the door on the most natural alternative to staying away. If even the
best repellent is dangerous to use, then "just protect yourself and go" stops being a safe option - so
not traveling looks wiser. That directly supports the conclusion, which is exactly what a strengthener does. So E is
in scope.
Notice this is the same machinery as A and E both: A removes "just take the medicine" as a safe out, and E removes "just use repellent" as a safe out. Both push you toward avoidance.
Compare that with
B - the government reducing mosquitoes makes the region
safer, which pushes against the advice to avoid it. That's why B is the EXCEPT answer, not E.
Quick gut-check for "is this out of scope?": don't ask
"does it share the topic?" - ask
"does it make the conclusion more or less likely?"- If E said the best repellent is
cheap and harmless, would that help or hurt the "don't travel" advice?
- See how flipping that one fact flips the effect? That's the test for relevance - not the topic label.
Answer: Bdurant25
Isn't E completely off the topic/out of Scope?