sudeepmodak
Q5 help needed on E. How did we arrive on this solution.
Step 1: read the question
Quote:
5. The passage implies that precipitation in the desert tortoise’s habitat
So this is an INFERENCE question, which means the answer to the question is logically implied by what's in the passage, even if it's not explicitly spelled out for us. We want to say what is implied about precipitation in the tortoise's habitats.
Little bit of vocab needed there. 'Precipitation' means 'rain,' more or less.
The information about the weather and rain comes in the final paragraph. So what do we know about rain in these habitats? Well we know it's not frequent, as it's an 'arid' habitat. The last line of the passage says that the tortoises 'dig precipitation basins' in the soil and linger near one when rain is impending. So we know the tortoiss collect precipitation themselves.
Now I go to the answer choices:
Quote:
A. falls approximately once a year
Nothing in the passage says that precipitation only falls one a year. If you thought this answer was correct, it might be because this bit: "adults can survive a year without access to water, they rely heavily on moisture in the vegetation consumed in spring," which does mention a 'year' and then 'spring' (which might be thought of as a 'single time in a year.' But that sentence does not mean precipitation only falls once a year.
Quote:
B. increases the tortoise’s resistance to pathogens
The only connection to resistance to pathogens we get pertains to the loss of native plants, not to precipitation itself.
Quote:
C. falls mainly in the spring
This is likely true, but is not in the passage. We're told the animals eat a lot of vegetation in spring, and they rely on that vegetation for moisture. But that's not about rainfall itself.
Quote:
D. is consumed primarily by grazing livestock
Again, this is pertaining more to vegetation, not to precipitation itself.
Quote:
E. is collected by the tortoises intentionally
This seems right, as the tortoises dig basins in the soil (a basin is like a 'bowl'). So they dig a bowl, and sit by the bowl when rain is coming. Seems that they do that to collect rainwater.
[For debate, let me try to cobble together a justification for B, because something about it intrigues me.
The last paragraph makes clear tortoises get moisture from vegetation. If that vegetation gets lost, the tortoise has less resistance to pathogens. While the passage doesn't explicitly say that low resistance is due to the loss of moisture from the plants, the passage does use 'THOUGH' when talking about how the tortoises also dig precipitation basins.
Consider just the first part of the sentence:
"The loss of native plants to grazing livestock and invasive plant species, then, may lessen the tortoise’s resistance to pathogens, though [something else can happen]."
Per the logic of 'though,' doesn't it seem that the 'something else' is something that can INCREASE resistance to pathogens? It seems the 'though' has a few possible logical functions in that clause: to show that there is something mitigating the loss of native plants ("though recent laws against livestock grazing in tortoise habits have been passed"); to show that while the loss of native plants does some harm it also does some good ("though many of the vegetation are also highly poisonous to tortoises"); to show the loss of vegetation might actually increase resistance to pathogens ("though some scientists think the native plants actually do harm to the tortoise's immune system"); or, to show that the tortoises have another way of getting resistance to pathogens.
The only one that 'tortoises dig precipitation basins' seems to fit would be that last category.
Something about the tortoises digging precipitation bins must qualify the fact that the loss of native plants lessens the tortoise's resistance to pathogens.
This is the best argument I could make for B. And I'm not entirely sure how to break that chain].