It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 13:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1205

Kudos [?]: 844 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan
Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2005, 06:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a ring of stones thousands of years ago in Britain were knowledgeable about celestial
events. The ground for this claim is that two of the stones determine a line pointing directly to the position of the sun at sunrise at the spring
equinox. There are many stones in the ring, however, so the chance that one pair will point in a celestially significant direction is large.

Therefore, the people who built the ring were not knowledgeable about celestial events.

Which one of the following is an error of reasoning in Dobson’s argument?

(A) The failure of cited evidence to establish a statement is taken as evidence that that statement is false.

(B) Dobson’s conclusion logically contradicts some of the evidence presented in support of it.

(C) Statements that absolutely establish Dobson’s conclusion are treated as if they merely give some support to that conclusion.

(D) Something that is merely a matter of opinion is treated as if it were subject to verification as a matter of fact.

(E) Dobson’s drawing the conclusion relies on interpreting a key term in two different ways.

Hi, I know this has been posted before. But I need your explicit explanation, thanks.

Kudos [?]: 844 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 893

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2005, 16:53
go with (A).

Evidence: two of the stones determine a line pointing directly to the position of the sun at sunrise at the spring
equinox.

Since the evidence fails to establish the conclusion, Dobson concluded that this whole statement is crap.

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 22 Apr 2005, 16:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.