GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Jul 2018, 01:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not on

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
V
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 624
Location: United States (MA)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2018, 00:00
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (01:04) correct 56% (01:17) wrong based on 165 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not only in this country but in many other countries as well, the excessive proportion of junk food in people's diets contributes to many common and serious health problems. If junk food were much more expensive than healthful food, people would be encouraged to make dietary changes that would reduce these problems.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the doctor's argument?

(A) Taxing junk food would benefit public health.
(B) In many countries, the excessive proportion of junk food in people 's diets contributes to many common and serious health problems.
(C) If junk food were much more expensive than healthful food, people would be encouraged to make dietary changes that would reduce many common and serious health problems.
(D) Taxing junk food would encourage people to reduce the proportion of junk food in their diets.
(E) Junk food should be taxed if doing so would benefit public health.

Source: LSAT

_________________

本当のライバルは昨日までの自分

Manager
Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Posts: 188
Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Apr 2018, 07:22
Akela wrote:
Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not only in this country but in many other countries as well, the excessive proportion of junk food in people's diets contributes to many common and serious health problems. If junk food were much more expensive than healthful food, people would be encouraged to make dietary changes that would reduce these problems.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the doctor's argument?

(A) Taxing junk food would benefit public health.
(B) In many countries, the excessive proportion of junk food in people 's diets contributes to many common and serious health problems.
(C) If junk food were much more expensive than healthful food, people would be encouraged to make dietary changes that would reduce many common and serious health problems.
(D) Taxing junk food would encourage people to reduce the proportion of junk food in their diets.
(E) Junk food should be taxed if doing so would benefit public health.

Source: LSAT

OA : A

(A) Taxing junk food would benefit public health.
Correct choice: Author has stated this conclusion in first sentence, after that Author is providing premise to support his/her conclusion
(B) In many countries, the excessive proportion of junk food in people 's diets contributes to many common and serious health problems.
Premise
(C) If junk food were much more expensive than healthful food, people would be encouraged to make dietary changes that would reduce many common and serious health problems.
Premise
(D) Taxing junk food would encourage people to reduce the proportion of junk food in their diets.
Inference, as not stated directly in passage
(E) Junk food should be taxed if doing so would benefit public health.
Trap, it has same key words as A , but should and if are diluting and changing the meaning
_________________

Good, good Let the kudos flow through you

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Posts: 4
Re: Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2018, 11:47
1
This simple problem actually got me confused. Funny! I thought 'A' is shell type choice, so 'C' is better, but turns out otherwise. I did identify quickly that first line is the conclusion, still. Anyway, got to not take simple questions casually.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 124
Re: Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2018, 08:39
Please clear my doubt cloud that I can strike off the answer choice which is premise of given stimulus of Must-be-True question.
You have crossed off B & C on above mentioned basis.

Princ wrote:
Akela wrote:
Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not only in this country but in many other countries as well, the excessive proportion of junk food in people's diets contributes to many common and serious health problems. If junk food were much more expensive than healthful food, people would be encouraged to make dietary changes that would reduce these problems.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the doctor's argument?

(A) Taxing junk food would benefit public health.
(B) In many countries, the excessive proportion of junk food in people 's diets contributes to many common and serious health problems.
(C) If junk food were much more expensive than healthful food, people would be encouraged to make dietary changes that would reduce many common and serious health problems.
(D) Taxing junk food would encourage people to reduce the proportion of junk food in their diets.
(E) Junk food should be taxed if doing so would benefit public health.

Source: LSAT

OA : A

(A) Taxing junk food would benefit public health.
Correct choice: Author has stated this conclusion in first sentence, after that Author is providing premise to support his/her conclusion
(B) In many countries, the excessive proportion of junk food in people 's diets contributes to many common and serious health problems.
Premise
(C) If junk food were much more expensive than healthful food, people would be encouraged to make dietary changes that would reduce many common and serious health problems.
Premise
(D) Taxing junk food would encourage people to reduce the proportion of junk food in their diets.
Inference, as not stated directly in passage
(E) Junk food should be taxed if doing so would benefit public health.
Trap, it has same key words as A , but should and if are diluting and changing the meaning
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 23 Dec 2011
Posts: 30
Re: Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2018, 12:38
(A) Taxing junk food would benefit public health. – Correct. Concludes reducing overall consumption of junk food would benefit public health.
(B) In many countries, the excessive proportion of junk food in people 's diets contribute to many common and serious health problems. – this just restates the premise.
(C) If junk food were much more expensive than healthful food, people would be encouraged to make dietary changes that would reduce many common and serious health problems. – This doesn’t establish any correlation between reduction in consumption and public health. Moreover it is restating the premise.
(D) Taxing junk food would encourage people to reduce the proportion of junk food in their diets. – this is more of an assumption than conclusion.
(E) Junk food should be taxed if doing so would benefit public health. – this is changing the meaning
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Posts: 188
Re: Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2018, 11:56
1
gvij2017
You can eliminate the options which are stating the premise in Must be true type questions,if the question is asking for conclusion of the argument.
Quote:
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the doctor's argument?

_________________

Good, good Let the kudos flow through you

Re: Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not on &nbs [#permalink] 28 Apr 2018, 11:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Doctor: It would benefit public health if junk food were taxed. Not on

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.