Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:43 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
gmatmania17
Joined: 16 Nov 2013
Last visit: 03 Mar 2015
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
93
 [15]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 20
Kudos: 93
 [15]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,253
 [7]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,253
 [7]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
littlewarthog
Joined: 22 Oct 2014
Last visit: 12 Mar 2015
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
161
 [5]
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.8
WE:General Management (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 80
Kudos: 161
 [5]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
manpreetsingh86
Joined: 13 Jun 2013
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 219
Kudos: 1,179
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
littlewarthog
The stem can be rephrased as: Is x prime? With this information we can start looking at the statements:

Statement 1: This is obviously not enough, as there is an infinite number of primes greater than 19!. E.G. 19!+1. As consecutive integers are mutually co-prime, 19!+1 must be a prime number.


19!+1 is not a prime no. it is divisible by 71. though, the highlighted portion is correct.
User avatar
littlewarthog
Joined: 22 Oct 2014
Last visit: 12 Mar 2015
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.8
WE:General Management (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 80
Kudos: 161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In deed, you are right. Thanks for the heads up. The conclusion stays valid though. For the numbers 2 to 22, it can easily be determined that they are not prime, so statement 2 is still sufficient.
avatar
gmatmania17
Joined: 16 Nov 2013
Last visit: 03 Mar 2015
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 20
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
littlewarthog
The stem can be rephrased as: Is x prime? With this information we can start looking at the statements:

Statement 1: This is obviously not enough, as there is an infinite number of primes greater than 19!. E.G. 19!+1. As consecutive integers are mutually co-prime, 19!+1 must be a prime number.

Statement 2: Sufficient. This statement explicitly excluded 19!+1, so we need to check if any value x is co-prime with 19!, in which case x would be prime, since 19! contains all factors<=19.

Because of the same reason, we do not need to actively check all values x <=19! + 19, for which x cannot be prime. One example for this: x=19! + 19:
\(x=19! + 19=18!*19+19=(18!+1)*19\) Therefore, x=19!+19 cannot be prime. The same goes for all other x<=19!+19


Now we need to exclude x=19!+20, x=19!+21 and x=19!+22. Since all of the summands added to 19! are non-prime numbers with factors between 1 and 19, they share factors as 19!. Therefore statement 2 is sufficient to conclude that x cannot be prime.

Answer B.

Why are you saying that we are looking for a prime number? For instance 6 has a factor greater than 1 and less than 6..
User avatar
littlewarthog
Joined: 22 Oct 2014
Last visit: 12 Mar 2015
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
161
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.8
WE:General Management (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 80
Kudos: 161
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear gmatmania,

You are right, actually the stem translates to "Is x NOT a prime number?" not "Is x a prime number?" as I have written mistakenly. For your example, as 6 does have factors greater than 1 and smaller than itself, it is not a prime.

However, this doesn't have an impact on the strategy for this question, or even its outcome. As this is a DS question, the question is "Do the statements provide another information to conclude that x is NOT a prime?", which is equivalent to "Do the statements provide enough information to conclude that x is a prime?"

Hope that helps.
avatar
gmatmania17
Joined: 16 Nov 2013
Last visit: 03 Mar 2015
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 20
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I can'understand what kind of number are19!+2 and 19!+22 without calculating them.. I can't understand statement 2

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
littlewarthog
Joined: 22 Oct 2014
Last visit: 12 Mar 2015
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
161
 [3]
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.8
WE:General Management (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 80
Kudos: 161
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If all summands of a sum are divisible by a factor, then the sim is also divisible by that factor.

Take for example 19!+6. 19! Is divisible by 6, as 6 is one of its factors and 6 is of course divisible by 6, the sum 19!+6 is also divisible by 6 and therefore no prime number.

With that approach, you can conclude that all numbers from 19!+2 to 19!+22 are not prime numbers, as they all have at least one factor other than 1 and itself.
avatar
gmatmania17
Joined: 16 Nov 2013
Last visit: 03 Mar 2015
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 20
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Will i have to consider only integers between 19! +2 and 19!+22? Can i consider 19!+2.1?

Thank you!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
littlewarthog
Joined: 22 Oct 2014
Last visit: 12 Mar 2015
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.8
WE:General Management (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 80
Kudos: 161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question stem says that x is a positive integer.

Happy to help. If this is helpful to you, please consider giving me Kudos.
User avatar
manpreetsingh86
Joined: 13 Jun 2013
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 219
Kudos: 1,179
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatmania17
I can'understand what kind of number are19!+2 and 19!+22 without calculating them.. I can't understand statement 2

Posted from my mobile device

lets consider a simple example lets say we have 5!+2. now 5! = 1*2*3*4*5. thus 5!+2= 1*2*3*4*5 +2 = 2(1*3*4*5 +1). now since the whole expression is a multiple of 2. thus 5!+2 is not a prime number. you can apply the same analogy for 19!+2.

also, for 19!+22. we know that 19! contains both 11 and 2. hence we can easily take out 22 as common factor. thus 19!+22 will not be a prime


gmatmania17
Will i have to consider only integers between 19! +2 and 19!+22? Can i consider 19!+2.1?

Thank you!

Posted from my mobile device

NO. since x is an integer. therefore fractional values are not allowed.

i hope it helps.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,535
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,535
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pepo
Does positive integer x have a factor f such that 1<f<x?

1) x> 19!

2) 19! + 2<x<19! + 22
Dear pepo,

Please do not start a new thread for a problem already posted. Please search extensively before beginning a brand new thread for a math question, because most GMAT practice math questions in existence have already been posted. You can find this one here:
dose-positive-integer-x-have-a-factor-f-such-that-1-f-x-190858.html
I will ask Bunuel to merge these topics.

Mike :-)
User avatar
adiagr
Joined: 18 Jan 2010
Last visit: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
Posts: 203
Kudos: 1,136
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatmania17
Does positive integer x have a factor f such that 1<f<x ?
(1) x > 19!
(2) 19! +2<=x<=19! +22

Thank you!


Let us take statement 2 First
We had enough explanation for statements such as 19! +2<=x<=19! +22.

x will always have a factor (other than 1 and itself). In other words x is NOT prime.

[say x = 19!+2 --> we can take 2 out. This means that x is divisible by 2. Similarly we can take out 3, 4, 5, .......upto 19. Bottomline: x is composite number]

B is sufficient.

Statement 1

x > 19!

x can be a prime number. In such a case we do not have any factor f.

Or it can be a composite number. In which case there will be some f

Not sufficient.

B is the answer.
avatar
sthahvi
Joined: 30 Nov 2018
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 194
Posts: 61
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I do not understand the question and the answers mentioned, can someone explain ?
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
496 posts