During the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capi

Question

During the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated to have left Mexico and added to the strain on the country’s debt-ridden economy.

(A) During the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated to have left Mexico and added

(B) During the 1980’s it is estimated that approximately $50 billion in private investment capital left Mexico and added

(C) It is estimated that there was approximately $50 billion in private investment capital that left Mexico during the 1980’s and added

(D) It is estimated that during the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital left Mexico, adding

(E) Approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated as having left Mexico during the 1980’s, adding

Show Spoiler

Can someone please explain why 'estimated as having left' in (E) is wrong? I would appreciate if the reason provided is more helpful than 'sounds awkward'

)-.

I understand that 'estimated to be' is idiomatic but looks like 'estimated as' is also idiomatic.

Show Answer

Official Answer

D

)-. I understand that 'estimated to be' is idiomatic but looks like 'estimated as' is also idiomatic.

TommyWallach · Accepted Answer

Hey All,

Just wanted to weigh in on this one quickly. You've all arrived at the right answer, but there's been some misinformation spread about why some of the answer choices are wrong. Let's look at them one by one.

During the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated to have left Mexico and added to the strain on the country’s debt-ridden economy.

The two major issues here are Modifiers and Parallelism. If you don't see that...it's time to buy the MGMAT SC guide! : )

(A) During the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated to have left Mexico and added
PROBLEMS:

MODIFIER: Prepositional phrases will often be bounced around sentences. This will necessarily change the meaning. DO NOT think that it doesn't matter where these prepositional phrases go. The phrase here is "During the 1980s" which is modifying the verb "is estimated" in this answer choice. But the estimation didn't happen during the 1890s, the money left during the 1980s. ALSO, the word "have" is not incorrect. It is neither singular nor plural, but part of the infinitive form "to have".

PARALLEL: The capital did not "leave Mexico" and "add strain". The FACT that money disappeared added strain, not the money itself.

(B) During the 1980’s it is estimated that approximately $50 billion in private investment capital left Mexico and added

PROBLEMS:

MODIFIER: Same as A.

PARALLEL: Same as A.

(C) It is estimated that there was approximately $50 billion in private investment capital that left Mexico during the 1980’s and added

PROBLEMS:

MODIFIER: This issue is fixed because the "during the 1980's" comes AFTER the estimation now.

PARALLEL: Same as A.

(D) It is estimated that during the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital left Mexico, adding

CORRECT ANSWER!

MODIFIER: This issue is fixed, because the "during the 1980s" comes AFTER the word estimated now.

PARALLEL: Instead of keeping capital as the subject of the verb "add", we've changed the verb "add" to the participle/modifier "adding", which modifies the FACT that the money left Mexico. This is what we were looking for all along.

(E) Approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated as having left Mexico during the 1980’s, adding

MODIFIER: During the 198s is okay.

PARALLEL: "adding" is oka.

IDIOM: You have to say "estimate to", not "estimate as" or even "estimate at".

Hope that helps!

-tommy

sondenso · Answer

This is one in my error log. Fortunately, someday ago I choose it correct. And here is my reasoning. Admittedly, this error is one of the toghest one I face

(A)   During the 1980’s   approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated to have left Mexico and added

"during the 1980's" modifies 50 billion, so "main verb-IS" must be "WAS"

(B)   During the 1980’s   it is estimated that approximately $50 billion in private investment capital left Mexico and added

Again, "During the 1980's" modifies "it", "IS" must be "WAS"

(C) It is estimated that there was approximately $50 billion in private investment capital that left Mexico   during the 1980’s   and added

"during the 1980's" modifies Verb-left, so the meaning changed

(D) It is estimated that during the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital left Mexico, adding
(E) Approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated   as having left Mexico during the 1980’s  , adding

dwivedys · Answer

$50 million was the estimated amount that had supposedly left mexico.

More than the grammar involved just look at E - it says Approx 50 mil is estimated has having left mexico - indicating that the estimate was that the money had left mexico - where as the it was the AMOUNT whose estimated value was 50 Million THAT had left mexico.

All things considered D sounds best.

Rubashov1 · Answer

A, B, C are all bad because of the "and added"...the capital itself wasn't added to the strain.

E uses the very strange "as having", which might be grammatically correct but is clearly stylistically inferior to D.

D

daagh · Answer

The core problem lies in equating the capital 'leaving' the country with 'the adding' to the strain. Adding to the strain is an effect of the 'leaving'. Hence leaving should be given the prime status and be referred by a verb. The adding part should be referred by a 'comma + ing' present participle (, adding) and not by ‘added’. Therefore, we can eliminate ABC on that score alone. Between D and E, D outplaces E with the better idiomatic use of 'estimated that'.

abhimahna · Answer

During the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated to have left Mexico and added to the strain on the country’s debt-ridden economy.

(A) During the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated to have left Mexico and added

(B) During the 1980’s it is estimated that approximately $50 billion in private investment capital left Mexico and added

(C) It is estimated that there was approximately $50 billion in private investment capital that left Mexico during the 1980’s and added

(D) It is estimated that during the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capital left Mexico, adding

(E) Approximately $50 billion in private investment capital is estimated as having left Mexico during the 1980’s, adding

Show Spoiler

Can someone please explain why 'estimated as having left' in (E) is wrong? I would appreciate if the reason provided is more helpful than 'sounds awkward'

)-.

I understand that 'estimated to be' is idiomatic but looks like 'estimated as' is also idiomatic.

Show Answer

Official Answer

D

thangvietnam · Answer

it is hard to realize modification between doing and main clause. in this case, two action is not separate and is considered one action. the action in doing can be context, reason, or effect of action in main clauses. the meaning relation is relation of reason, effect and contest and, so, is called versatile relation.

shades28 · Answer

Doesn't D have a dangling modifier issue? It can mean two things imo:
1. During the 1980's approximately... - Author is trying to mean that it might have happened in the 1980s.
2. During the 1980's approximately 50 million... - The actual meaning of the sentence.

Could some expert help me out here?  MartyTargetTestPrep

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

Great question.

The term you mean to use is "squinting modifier," which refers to a modifier that is placed between two possible targets and could modify either.

In this case, the meaning is pretty clear, and the reason it is is that "during the 1980s" pretty clearly indicates that the event in fact occurred during the 1980s, rather than around that time. After all, why would the author bother using "during" if the author wasn't sure when the event occurred. If the author were not sure, it would make more sense to say, "around the 1980s."

So, in this case, the author's choice of wording points to one meaning rather than the other.

That said, even if we were not satisfied with the placement of "approximately," the other versions of the sentence are so clearly flawed that (D) is clearly the best choice.

On a side note, even the best version of the sentence is a bit comical, in that it conveys that $50 billion added to the strain on the economy. Wait what?

VerbalBot · Answer

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

During the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capi

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

During the 1980’s approximately $50 billion in private investment capi

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards