Oct 15 12:00 PM PDT  01:00 PM PDT Join this live GMAT class with GMAT Ninja to learn to conquer your fears of long, kooky GMAT questions. Oct 16 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58333

Easy (A)/(B) Trap in Data Sufficiency Questions on the GMAT
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 May 2015, 04:55
FROM Veritas Prep Blog: Easy (A)/(B) Trap in Data Sufficiency Questions on the GMAT

We know that ‘Easy C’ is a common trap of DS questions – have you wondered whether there could be trap called ‘Easy A/B’ such that the answer would actually be (C)? Such questions also exist! The point is that whenever you feel that the question was way too simple, you might want to take a step back and review. GMAT will try every trick in the trade to delineate you. Let us show you a question which looks like an easy (A) but isn’t:
Question: 25 integers are written on a board. Are there at least two consecutive integers among them?
Statement 1: For every value in the list, if the value is increased by 1, the number of distinct values in the list does not change.
Statement 2: At least one value occurs more than once in the list.
Solution: Let’s first review the information given to us here:
25 integers are written on the board – we don’t know whether they are all distinct. We want to know if there is any pair of consecutive integers among them.
Let’s look at the statements:
Statement 1: For every value in the list, if the value is increased by 1, the number of distinct values in the list does not change.
It is easy to fall for statement 1 and think that it is sufficient alone. Say, if any single value is increased by 1 and it doesn’t match any other value already there in the list, it means that there are no consecutive integers, doesn’t it? Well, no! But we will talk about that in a minute. Let’s first look at why we might think that statement 1 is sufficient.
Say, the numbers are: 1, 5, 8, 10, 35, 76 …
If you increase 1 by 1, you get 2 and the list looks like this:
Now the numbers are 2, 5, 8, 10, 35, 76 …
Note that the number of distinct integers is the same.
Had there been two consecutive integers such as 1, 2, 8, 10, 35, 76 …
If we increase 1 by 1, the list would have become 2, 2, 8, 10, 35, 76 … – this would have decreased the number of distinct integers.
You might be tempted to say here that statement 1 alone is sufficient. What you might forget is that when you increase a number by 1, one distinct integer could be getting wiped out and another taking its place! It may not occur to you that the case might be different when one value occurs more than once, but statement 2 should give you a hint. Obviously, statement 2 alone is not sufficient but let’s analyze what happens when we take both statements together.
Since statement 1 doesn’t tell you that all values are distinct, statement 2 should make you think that you need to consider the case where one value occurs more than once in the list. In that case, is it possible that number of different values in the list does not change even though there is a pair of consecutive integers?
Say the numbers are 1, 1, 2, 8, 10, 35, 76 …
Now if you increase 1 by 1, the list would look like 1, 2, 2, 8, 10, 35, 76 …
Here, the number of distinct integers stays the same even when you increase a number by 1 and you have consecutive integers! In this case, if there were no consecutive integers, the number of distinct integers would have increased. Hence if the numbers are not all distinct and the number of distinct numbers needs to stay the same, there must be a pair of consecutive integers.
This tells you that statement 1 is not sufficient alone but both statements together answer the question with a ‘Yes’.
Answer (C)
Takeaway – Just as when you get an easy (C), you must check whether the answer could be (A) or (B), when you feel that the answer is an easy (A) or (B), you might want to check whether the other statement gives some relevant data and is necessary.
Karishma, a Computer Engineer with a keen interest in alternative Mathematical approaches, has mentored students in the continents of Asia, Europe and North America. She teaches the GMAT for Veritas Prep and regularly participates in content development projects such as this blog!

ForumBlogs  GMAT Club’s latest feature blends timely Blog entries with forum discussions. Now GMAT Club Forums incorporate all relevant information from Student, Admissions blogs, Twitter, and other sources in one place. You no longer have to check and follow dozens of blogs, just subscribe to the relevant topics and forums on GMAT club or follow the posters and you will get email notifications when something new is posted. Add your blog to the list! and be featured to over 300,000 unique monthly visitors
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2015
Posts: 458
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28 GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
WE: Sales (Consumer Products)

Re: Easy (A)/(B) Trap in Data Sufficiency Questions on the GMAT
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 May 2015, 21:44
Bunuel wrote: [rss2posts title="Veritas Prep Blog" title_url="http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2014/06/easyabtrapindatasufficiencyquestionsonthegmat/" sub_title="Easy (A)/(B) Trap in Data Sufficiency Questions on the GMAT"] We know that ‘Easy C’ is a common trap of DS questions – have you wondered whether there could be trap called ‘Easy A/B’ such that the answer would actually be (C)? Such questions also exist! The point is that whenever you feel that the question was way too simple, you might want to take a step back and review. GMAT will try every trick in the trade to delineate you. Let us show you a question which looks like an easy (A) but isn’t: Question: 25 integers are written on a board. Are there at least two consecutive integers among them? Statement 1: For every value in the list, if the value is increased by 1, the number of distinct values in the list does not change. Statement 2: At least one value occurs more than once in the list. Is it possible that questions like this can appear on GMAT? I mean, its tricky.
_________________
 The Mind is Everything, What we Think we Become.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58333

Re: Easy (A)/(B) Trap in Data Sufficiency Questions on the GMAT
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 May 2015, 04:04
dkumar2012 wrote: Bunuel wrote: [rss2posts title="Veritas Prep Blog" title_url="http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2014/06/easyabtrapindatasufficiencyquestionsonthegmat/" sub_title="Easy (A)/(B) Trap in Data Sufficiency Questions on the GMAT"] We know that ‘Easy C’ is a common trap of DS questions – have you wondered whether there could be trap called ‘Easy A/B’ such that the answer would actually be (C)? Such questions also exist! The point is that whenever you feel that the question was way too simple, you might want to take a step back and review. GMAT will try every trick in the trade to delineate you. Let us show you a question which looks like an easy (A) but isn’t: Question: 25 integers are written on a board. Are there at least two consecutive integers among them? Statement 1: For every value in the list, if the value is increased by 1, the number of distinct values in the list does not change. Statement 2: At least one value occurs more than once in the list. Is it possible that questions like this can appear on GMAT? I mean, its tricky. Yes, it's quit tricky but still a valid question. It's discussed HERE.
_________________



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13160

Re: Easy (A)/(B) Trap in Data Sufficiency Questions on the GMAT
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Aug 2019, 15:17
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: Easy (A)/(B) Trap in Data Sufficiency Questions on the GMAT
[#permalink]
30 Aug 2019, 15:17






