1. Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of the passage?(A) According to critics, communities that seek to increase their prosperity recognize the need to gauge the value and ensure the long-term health of their local environment.
(B) Economists’ definition of prosperity strictly in terms of monetary value is too narrow to truly capture our ordinary conception of this notion.
(C) If economists were to alter and expand their definition of prosperity, it is likely that the economic and environmental health of most communities would appear worse under the new definition than under the old definition.
(D) In contrast with the views of economists, some critics believe that prosperity can be neither scientifically measured nor accurately defined, and as a concept is therefore of little use for economists.
(E) While they are generally an accurate and practical measure of current economic prosperity, figures for the total expenditures of a nation do not aid in providing an indication of that nation’s future economic prospects.
2. The example in the passage of the timber industry and its effect on a poor rural community suggests that the critics would most likely agree with which one of the following statements?(A) Harvest limitations have little relationship to lower wages or fewer jobs in the community.
(B) Harvest limitations should be imposed only when the limitations have wide public support in the community.
(C) The advantages to the community that would be created by harvest limitations are likely to outweigh the disadvantages.
(D) Communities protest harvest limitations primarily because they do not understand the long-term monetary impact of such regulation.
(E) It is the arguments of economists that often cause residents of rural communities to view harvest limitations more negatively.
3. Based on the information in the passage, the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements regarding the weakening of the earth’s ozone layer?(A) Paradoxically, the weakening of the ozone layer actually contributes to environmental health and quality of life.
(B) The environmental effects of this problem are likely to occur more gradually than the economic effects.
(C) The appearance of prosperity that results from this problem has directed attention away from solving it.
(D) This problem should be regarded primarily as threatening rather than contributing to true prosperity.
(E) This problem has resulted in part from the failure of economists to recognize it in its formative stages.
4. According to the passage, economists defend their concept of prosperity in which one of the following ways?(A) by claiming that alternative definitions of the concept would not be easily quantifiable
(B) by asserting that environmental preservation can cause the loss of jobs
(C) by citing the relevance of nonmonetary values such as environmental health
(D) by showing that the value of natural beauty can be understood in quantifiable terms
(E) by detailing the historical development of their definition of the concept
5. The author compares the economists’ position to that of a literary critic (lines 52–57) primarily to(A) introduce the idea that the assessment of worth is basically subjective
(B) advocate an innovative method of measuring literary merit
(C) suggest that quality of life is mainly an aesthetic issue
(D) provide additional evidence that prosperity cannot be quantified
(E) illustrate the limitations of the economists’ position
6. In the passage, the author cites which one of the following claims?(A) that hats, sunglasses, and sunscreens provide an adequate substitute for the ozone layer
(B) that environmental protection measures are unpopular and often rejected by communities
(C) that the value of a locale’s environment can be gauged by the incomes of its residents
(D) that timber harvest limits are needed to save one area from environmental damage
(E) that most nations measure their own prosperity in terms broader than monetary value
7. The primary purpose of the passage is to(A) argue that there is an inherent and potentially detrimental conflict between two schools of thought concerning a certain concept
(B) summarize and illustrate the main points of the conflict between two schools of thought over the definition of a certain concept
(C) question one school of thought’s definition of a certain concept and suggest several possible alternative definitions
(D) criticize one school of thought’s definition of a certain concept by providing examples that illustrate the implications of adhering to this definition
(E) bring one school of thought’s perspective to bear on a concept traditionally considered to be the exclusive territory of another school of thought