Last visit was: 22 May 2025, 13:17 It is currently 22 May 2025, 13:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 15,234
Own Kudos:
45,093
 [5]
Given Kudos: 6,032
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,234
Kudos: 45,093
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
DwightScruthe
Joined: 22 Jun 2021
Last visit: 19 May 2022
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Posts: 7
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
RohiniK
Joined: 21 Jun 2019
Last visit: 28 Sep 2024
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
48
 [1]
Given Kudos: 90
Posts: 34
Kudos: 48
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Anshuman0902
Joined: 31 Jul 2020
Last visit: 28 Sep 2023
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Posts: 50
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
explanation for question no.4
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 15,234
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,032
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,234
Kudos: 45,093
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Anshuman0902
explanation for question no.4

Explanation

4. According to the passage, economists defend their concept of prosperity in which one of the following ways?

Difficulty Level: 550-600

Explanation

This question shifts gears and asks us how the economists that the author has been criticizing defend themselves. We know from our Roadmap that the author discusses the economists’ response in paragraph 4, and there we see that the economists whined about how hard it would be to quantify happiness and environmental health. (A) restates exactly that.

(B) distorts a detail from the end of paragraph 2; the loss of jobs is an argument made by the rural community’s residents, not by the economists.

(C) is a 180: It’s the critics, not the economists, who believe in the relevance of nonmonetary values.

(D) is a train wreck in that (1) it’s the critics, not the economists, who think that nonmonetary values, perhaps including natural beauty, can be quantified; (2) the entire concept of “natural beauty” is a distortion from paragraph 3; and (3) the entire answer choice is outside the scope, as the author never expressly takes up whether “natural beauty” can be quantified.

(E) The economists never discuss even the slightest “historical” basis for their definition. Totally outside the scope.

Answer: A
User avatar
Akarshkhan86
Joined: 21 Sep 2022
Last visit: 20 Feb 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,588
Location: India
Posts: 56
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Sajjad1994 can you share the OE of Ques.2? I am facing difficulty in eliminating between option C & E.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 15,234
Own Kudos:
45,093
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,032
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,234
Kudos: 45,093
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Akarshkhan86
Hello Sajjad1994 can you share the OE of Ques.2? I am facing difficulty in eliminating between option C & E.

Explanation

2. The example in the passage of the timber industry and its effect on a poor rural community suggests that the critics would most likely agree with which one of the following statements?

Difficulty Level: 600-650

Explanation

We’re asked what the critics would “most likely agree” with regarding the “rural community.” We noted the rural community in paragraph 2 and the critics’ response to the situation in paragraph 3. Looking to paragraph 3, we find that the critics were in favor of harvest limitations and believe that in the absence of limits, “the community will…lose much more.” Only (C) points out the beneficial nature of the harvest limitations for which the critics argue.

(A) distorts two details—lower wages and fewer jobs— and does so in a tone contrary to that of the critics. We don’t know how strong or weak the critics believe the relationship to be.

(B) The critics think the limitations are good, for starters, and the author never presents a condition that’s necessary to their imposition.

(D) This particular community protested timber harvest limitations because they derive income from timber, period. We don’t know what these folks did or did not understand about long-term implications, nor can we make an inference about other protesting communities generally.

(E) We know from paragraph 2 that the community’s residents “implicitly adopt[ed] the economists’ point of view.” In no sense does that imply that they listened to economists’ arguments, let alone heeded them.

Answer: C
User avatar
siddhantvarma
Joined: 12 May 2024
Last visit: 22 May 2025
Posts: 466
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 174
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Posts: 466
Kudos: 413
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It took 16 mins with 2 incorrect, got both correct during the review. ­I probably spent a bit more time reading the passage since it's simple and easy to understand.😅

Summary: This passage discusses the debate between economists and their critics over the definition of prosperity. Economists traditionally define prosperity in purely monetary terms, while critics argue this definition is too narrow and overlooks important factors like quality of life and environmental health. The passage presents examples illustrating how a strictly monetary definition of prosperity can be misleading or even harmful, and argues for a broader, more comprehensive understanding of prosperity.

Passage Breakdown:

Paragraph 1: Introduces the economists' monetary definition of prosperity and the critics' objections. Provides an example of how environmental degradation (ozone depletion) could paradoxically increase monetary prosperity.

Paragraph 2: Presents an example of a rural community where pursuing monetary prosperity (through timber harvesting) could damage quality of life and the environment.

Paragraph 3: Expands on the rural community example, showing how the critics argue that even in monetary terms, preserving the environment has value for the community.

Paragraph 4: Presents the economists' defense of their definition, arguing for the need for easily quantifiable measures. The author criticizes this stance as dodging the real issues.

Paragraph 5: Concludes with an analogy comparing the economists' stance to judging a book's value solely by its sales, emphasizing the limitations of purely quantitative measures.



Question 1: Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of the passage?

(A) According to critics, communities that seek to increase their prosperity recognize the need to gauge the value and ensure the long-term health of their local environment.
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't state that communities seeking to increase prosperity recognize the need to gauge environmental value. In fact, the passage suggests the opposite in the timber industry example.

(B) Economists’ definition of prosperity strictly in terms of monetary value is too narrow to truly capture our ordinary conception of this notion.
This is correct because it accurately summarizes the main argument of the passage. The author consistently criticizes the economists' narrow monetary definition of prosperity and argues for a broader conception that includes factors like quality of life and environmental health. This is evident in the summary and throughout the passage breakdown.

(C) If economists were to alter and expand their definition of prosperity, it is likely that the economic and environmental health of most communities would appear worse under the new definition than under the old definition.
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't discuss how expanding the definition would affect the appearance of economic and environmental health.

(D) In contrast with the views of economists, some critics believe that prosperity can be neither scientifically measured nor accurately defined, and as a concept is therefore of little use for economists.
This is incorrect because while critics argue for a broader definition of prosperity, they don't claim it can't be measured or defined at all.

(E) While they are generally an accurate and practical measure of current economic prosperity, figures for the total expenditures of a nation do not aid in providing an indication of that nation’s future economic prospects.
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't focus on current vs. future economic prospects, but rather on the limitations of purely monetary measures of prosperity.



Question 2: The example in the passage of the timber industry and its effect on a poor rural community suggests that the critics would most likely agree with which one of the following statements?

(A) Harvest limitations have little relationship to lower wages or fewer jobs in the community.
This is incorrect because the passage acknowledges that harvest limitations could lower wages or cause job losses (lines 27-29).

(B) Harvest limitations should be imposed only when the limitations have wide public support in the community.
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't discuss public support for harvest limitations.

(C) The advantages to the community that would be created by harvest limitations are likely to outweigh the disadvantages.
This is correct because the critics argue that without harvest limitations, the land would be seriously damaged (lines 32-34), and that the natural beauty of the area has substantial value to residents (lines 34-42). This suggests that the critics believe the benefits of limitations outweigh the disadvantages.

(D) Communities protest harvest limitations primarily because they do not understand the long-term monetary impact of such regulation.
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't suggest that communities misunderstand the long-term monetary impact of regulations.

(E) It is the arguments of economists that often cause residents of rural communities to view harvest limitations more negatively.
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't attribute the community's view of harvest limitations to economists' arguments.



Question 3: Based on the information in the passage, the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements regarding the weakening of the earth’s ozone layer?

(A) Paradoxically, the weakening of the ozone layer actually contributes to environmental health and quality of life.
This is incorrect because the passage presents the economic activity resulting from ozone depletion as a misleading indicator of prosperity, not a genuine contribution to health and quality of life.

(B) The environmental effects of this problem are likely to occur more gradually than the economic effects.
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't compare the timelines of environmental and economic effects.

(C) The appearance of prosperity that results from this problem has directed attention away from solving it.
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't suggest that the appearance of prosperity has distracted from solving the problem.

(D) This problem should be regarded primarily as threatening rather than contributing to true prosperity.
This is correct because the author presents the ozone layer example to illustrate how "troubling reductions in environmental health and quality of life" can paradoxically appear to increase prosperity by the economists' measure (lines 14-17). This implies that the author views the problem as a threat to true prosperity.

(E) This problem has resulted in part from the failure of economists to recognize it in its formative stages.
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't attribute the ozone problem to economists' failure to recognize it early on.



Question 4: According to the passage, economists defend their concept of prosperity in which one of the following ways?

(A) by claiming that alternative definitions of the concept would not be easily quantifiable
This is correct because the passage states that "Economists respond by arguing that to be a useful concept, prosperity must be defined in easily quantifiable terms" (lines 45-47).

(B) by asserting that environmental preservation can cause the loss of jobs
This is incorrect because the passage attributes this view to community residents, not economists.

(C) by citing the relevance of nonmonetary values such as environmental health
This is incorrect because the passage presents economists as excluding non-monetary values from their definition.

(D) by showing that the value of natural beauty can be understood in quantifiable terms
This is incorrect because the passage presents this argument as coming from the critics, not the economists.

(E) by detailing the historical development of their definition of the concept
This is incorrect because the passage doesn't mention the historical development of the economists' definition.



Question 5: The author compares the economists’ position to that of a literary critic (lines 52–57) primarily to

(E) illustrate the limitations of the economists’ position
This is correct because the author uses the literary critic analogy to illustrate "the limitations of the economists' position" (lines 52-57). The analogy shows how relying solely on easily quantifiable measures (book sales or monetary value) can miss important aspects of value (literary merit or true prosperity).

A, B, C, and D are incorrect because they don't accurately reflect the purpose of the analogy, which is specifically to illustrate the limitations of the economists' position.


Question 6: In the passage, the author cites which one of the following claims?

(D) that timber harvest limits are needed to save one area from environmental damage
This is correct because the passage states that "Without the harvest limitations, they say, the land on which the community depends would be seriously damaged" (lines 32-34).

A, B, C, and E are incorrect because these claims are not made in the passage.


Question 7: The primary purpose of the passage is to

(D) criticize one school of thought’s definition of a certain concept by providing examples that illustrate the implications of adhering to this definition
This is correct because the primary purpose of the passage is to criticize the economists' definition of prosperity by providing examples (ozone depletion, timber industry) that illustrate the problematic implications of adhering to this definition.

A, B, C, and E are incorrect because they don't accurately capture the main purpose of the passage, which is to criticize the economists' definition and illustrate its shortcomings.­
User avatar
SH160703
Joined: 13 Sep 2024
Last visit: 04 Apr 2025
Posts: 9
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Sustainability
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
what should be ideal time to solve passage of this level if a candidae is practicing gmat rc from past three months .... i took 12:50 .... thanks brother

Sajjad1994
Anshuman0902
explanation for question no.4

Explanation

4. According to the passage, economists defend their concept of prosperity in which one of the following ways?

Difficulty Level: 550-600

Explanation

This question shifts gears and asks us how the economists that the author has been criticizing defend themselves. We know from our Roadmap that the author discusses the economists’ response in paragraph 4, and there we see that the economists whined about how hard it would be to quantify happiness and environmental health. (A) restates exactly that.

(B) distorts a detail from the end of paragraph 2; the loss of jobs is an argument made by the rural community’s residents, not by the economists.

(C) is a 180: It’s the critics, not the economists, who believe in the relevance of nonmonetary values.

(D) is a train wreck in that (1) it’s the critics, not the economists, who think that nonmonetary values, perhaps including natural beauty, can be quantified; (2) the entire concept of “natural beauty” is a distortion from paragraph 3; and (3) the entire answer choice is outside the scope, as the author never expressly takes up whether “natural beauty” can be quantified.

(E) The economists never discuss even the slightest “historical” basis for their definition. Totally outside the scope.

Answer: A
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7307 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15234 posts