M838TE
GMATNinja else
No concrete explanation I could find for C.
the only thing I could think of is the logical intention of using "but still" to modify a previous. I would think but still will signal a concession from a contrast to the current situation (elk's current habitat). there was nothing in the main clause that would be contrast to the elk's ability to once range all over the place.
(E) use of since in E seems to be have the same flaw.
Thanks!
(C) doesn't have any clear and obvious grammar mistakes, but it does have several little meaning issues.
Quote:
"...living now solely
almost in the Rocky Mountains..."
The elk are now only living
almost in the Rocky Mountains? The "almost" should come before "solely" (as in choice B) to make it clear that "almost" modifies "solely" and not the prepositional phrase ("in the Rocky Mountains").
As written, (C) seems to suggest that the elk are living
near the Rocky Mountains (not quite IN the Rocky Mountains -- ALMOST in the Rocky Mountains). Does that mean that I'll have elk in my tiny little backyard near downtown Denver? Sounds great!
Quote:
"It would seem that elk would be mountain dwellers
because of their living now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains"
The meaning of the "because of" part is unclear. Does this mean that elk dwell in the mountains BECAUSE they live now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains? That doesn't make any sense.
Yes, the reader can eventually figure out the logical meaning. But the cause-and-effect relationship (and the overall meaning) is much clearer in (B):
Quote:
"The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers."
What makes it seem that the elk are mountain dwellers? The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains. And that meaning is perfectly clear and logical.
Quote:
We could drive ourselves nuts trying to analyze the word "still", but I would argue that it's unnecessary at best, and potentially a little bit confusing.
The word "still" is often used to convey the idea that something happens DESPITE something else. For example:
"Tim's car has faulty brakes, but still, it drives like a dream."
In this example, "still" is basically a synonym for "nevertheless" or "in spite of". Basically
because the brakes are faulty, we would NOT expect the car to drive like a dream; nevertheless, it does in fact drive like a dream.
So I guess we could argue that the timing of the "but still" logic seems off: in spite of something that's happening now ("it
would seem..."), the elk did something in the past ("they once ranged..."). It would make sense for something to be happening now IN SPITE OF something that happened in the past, but in (C) the "cause" seems to come after the "effect".
Sure, we could probably come up with an example where that sort of timing makes sense, but in this case it just adds to the confusion.
Is the use of "still" absolutely WRONG? Maybe not. But the meaning is a little bit easier to follow without it.
Again: I wouldn't overthink the use of "still" in this case, mostly because we have plenty of other reasons to pick (B) over (C). So don't lose too much sleep over it.
One last thing:
Quote:
Even though there's nothing inherently wrong with using "it" as a
non-referential pronoun in a situation like this one, why use one if you don't have to? That's another vote in favor of (B) over (C).
Again, (C) doesn't violate any straightforward rules, but when we compare it to (B), we see that (B) is a much better, clearer option.
I hope that helps!