GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Jan 2019, 01:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

     January 26, 2019

     January 26, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.
  • Free GMAT Number Properties Webinar

     January 27, 2019

     January 27, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes.

Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 285
Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 05 Dec 2018, 03:55
2
44
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (01:26) correct 27% (00:59) wrong based on 2314 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.


A. Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while

B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but

C. It would seem that elk would be mountain dwellers because of their living now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, but still

D. Now living almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, it would seem that elk were mountain dwellers, although

E. It seems that elk would be mountain dwellers from the fact that they now live solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, since

Originally posted by singh_amit19 on 14 Oct 2007, 10:24.
Last edited by Bunuel on 05 Dec 2018, 03:55, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2795
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2012, 07:09
11
7
spider wrote:
humtum0 wrote:
Agree with A. In a "which" is modifying the entire clause.


I see a lot of people going for B...

B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but

I would go for B if you can explain who "it" and "they" are referring tooo..

Is elk - singular or plural -- thats my doubt...I see in choice A -- "are" referring to elk ...confuses me a lot.


Hi there,

This is the sentence with the correct answer choice B:

The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.

In this sentence, “it” is not functioning as a proper pronoun. It is rather working as what is called “a placeholder”. For example:

It is very windy today.

In this sentence, “it” is just functioning as a placeholder and thus does not have a definite antecedent. This is the case with the sentence in question as well.

Now, pronoun “they” is referring to “Elk” only. In three out of two choices, “Elk” has been mentioned as plural. This is not uncommon because there are many animals whose plural form does not take “s” at the end. For example: sheep, fish, deer, etc. Also note that the animals belonging to the deer family have the same singular and plural forms. “Elk” happens to be one of them. If you do not know what an “elk” is, read the answer choices. If any of the answer choices has a singular verb to with “Elk” then we may need to see if this entity is singular or plural.
However, in this sentence, it is clear that “elk” has been used as plural entity.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________








Everything you need to ace the GMAT and more
Basics of the GMAT
GMAT Exam Strategies
GMAT Study Plans
GMAT Verbal Subject Matter
GMAT AWA & IR




| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Most Helpful Community Reply
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 323
Location: United States
WE: Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2014, 14:38
11
4
Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.

First look: Grammatical construction, logical predication - In general, anytime there is a cause and effect relationship, test-makers have a field day in switching the position of relationship so as to form other answer choices. Typically, if the relationship is constructed with appropriate verb forms, the inverted relationship stands. That said, it's important to stay disciplined and test each clause for its proper components - i.e. verb form, logic predication, etc.

A. Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while "while" signifies at the same time and "ranged once" was past tense, so I thought the sentence was illogical.

B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but Correct - "They" agree with the pronoun in the non-underlined section of the sentence. The sentence is inherently wordy, so I looked for a better one first.

C. It would seem that elk would be mountain dwellers because of their living now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, but still Wrong - "But still" is redundant. "Because of their living" is awkward and nonsensical. "solely almost" is reversed and non-sensical.

D. Now living almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, it would seem that elk were mountain dwellers, although Wrong - "Now living" is an dangling modifier.

E. It seems that elk would be mountain dwellers from the fact that they now live solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, since "Solely almost" is reversed, awkward, and non-sensical. Also, I think this answer choice is wordy
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 285
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2007, 10:25
I am in for D- tried to avoid pronoun error, which is there in other choices!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 291
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2007, 11:36
3
singh_amit19 wrote:
I am in for D- tried to avoid pronoun error, which is there in other choices!


Going with B here.

For D "Now living almost solely in the Rocky Mountains," should be immediately followed by elk.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 567
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2007, 16:44
1
singh_amit19 wrote:
Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.

A. Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while
B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but
C. It would seem that elk would be mountain dwellers because of their living now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, but still
D. Now living almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, it would seem that elk were mountain dwellers, although
E. It seems that elk would be mountain dwellers from the fact that they now live solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, since


'E' - incorrect - usage of 'would be' - a future tense. Also usage of 'Since' incorrect

'C' - incorrect - same as 'E'

'A' - incorrect - 'it' - Ambiguous and Farway Antecedent

'D' - incorrect - 'were' and 'now' doesn't reconcile.

Hence 'B' will be my choice of answer
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2421
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2007, 17:34
3
3
singh_amit19 wrote:
Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.

A. Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while
B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but
C. It would seem that elk would be mountain dwellers because of their living now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, but still
D. Now living almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, it would seem that elk were mountain dwellers, although
E. It seems that elk would be mountain dwellers from the fact that they now live solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, since


B.

A: which incorrectly refers to rocky mountains.
C: long awkward phrase. "because of their living" should signal a red flag.
D: Now living almost soley in the rocky mountains... should be followed by the Elk, but the modifier is not so this choice is incorrect.
E: I didn't like this choice because it seemed to change the meaning.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2008
Posts: 62
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2008, 04:33
1
vivektripathi wrote:
vivektripathi wrote:
Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.
A. Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem
that elk are mountain dwellers, while = Correct answer



Which modifies "mountains"

I dont think so just the "mountains" would make seem that elk are mountain dwellers

"Living in mountains" show that and which cannot modify the entire clause or its action

A is incorrect

source, please
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Posts: 46
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2014, 05:50
1
singh_amit19 wrote:
Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.

A. Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while
B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but
C. It would seem that elk would be mountain dwellers because of their living now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, but still
D. Now living almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, it would seem that elk were mountain dwellers, although
E. It seems that elk would be mountain dwellers from the fact that they now live solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, since


A: which refers to Rocky Mountains
B: are is correct tense (it would seem that they are mountain dwellers, present tense because of 'elk now live')
C: would be is wrong. still they once ranged makes no sense
D: were is the wrong tense (now living ....it would seem that elk were)
E: would be is wrong. solely almost changes the meaning
Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 48
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2015, 02:25
egmat wrote:
spider wrote:
humtum0 wrote:
Agree with A. In a "which" is modifying the entire clause.


I see a lot of people going for B...

B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but

I would go for B if you can explain who "it" and "they" are referring tooo..

Is elk - singular or plural -- thats my doubt...I see in choice A -- "are" referring to elk ...confuses me a lot.


Hi there,

This is the sentence with the correct answer choice B:

The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.

In this sentence, “it” is not functioning as a proper pronoun. It is rather working as what is called “a placeholder”. For example:

It is very windy today.

In this sentence, “it” is just functioning as a placeholder and thus does not have a definite antecedent. This is the case with the sentence in question as well.

Now, pronoun “they” is referring to “Elk” only. In three out of two choices, “Elk” has been mentioned as plural. This is not uncommon because there are many animals whose plural form does not take “s” at the end. For example: sheep, fish, deer, etc. Also note that the animals belonging to the deer family have the same singular and plural forms. “Elk” happens to be one of them. If you do not know what an “elk” is, read the answer choices. If any of the answer choices has a singular verb to with “Elk” then we may need to see if this entity is singular or plural.
However, in this sentence, it is clear that “elk” has been used as plural entity.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha


"Would make it seem" is a kind of idiom? I had never noticed this one before in other questions and was confused when saw it, so eliminated this answer.. It is definitely different from "It is very windi today" example, to be honest) can anyone help with it please?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1112
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2015, 07:13
3
1
Delamax wrote:
"Would make it seem" is a kind of idiom? I had never noticed this one before in other questions and was confused when saw it, so eliminated this answer.. It is definitely different from "It is very windi today" example, to be honest) can anyone help with it please?


Well, According to me Would make it seem is definitely not an idiom.

Also I get confused sometimes in case of usage of pronouns such as "it" and would in-spite going through their rules number of times. However here I guess we can go by meaning wise keeping other confusions to a side.

Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.

Since they is used to refer Elk in non underlined portion it is correct.
The intended meaning is since Elk live solely in R mountains, they seem to be mountain dwellers.

A. Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while

which refers to Rocky mountains thereby causing meaning error.
This sentence seems to mean that Rocky mountains seem that elk are mountain dwellers.


B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but

here it refers to fact and the meaning is intended one with sequence of events and contrast in meaning is correctly indicated with but.


C. It would seem that elk would be mountain dwellers because of their living now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, but still

Because of is used wrongly here. The sentence that elk would be mountain dwellers is itself wrong.
And here it is mentioned that elk would be mountain dwellers due to their living.
solely almost ALSO GIVES OTHERWISE MEANING.
still ruins the contrast indicated by but also makes it seem redundant.


D. Now living almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, it would seem that elk were mountain dwellers, although

who lives in Rocky mountains is not ambiguous.
were changes the meaning completely.


E. It seems that elk would be mountain dwellers from the fact that they now live
solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, since

The sentence that elk would be mountain dwellers is itself wrong. Same error as in C.
since gives reason instead of contrast in meaning.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Aug 2013
Posts: 21
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 710 Q51 V36
GMAT 2: 710 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.6
CAT Tests
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2016, 03:43
Hi Experts,

I got this question correct but I'm trying to understand some of the nuances here.

1) Usage of almost solely - In the correct choice, almost modifies solely and suggests that they are almost alone/on their own in rocky mountains. But in choices C and D, 'solely almost' flips the modifier relationship. Now, in latter, solely modifies almost though I'm still struggling what would that mean. Does my reasoning sound accurate?

2) Usage of seem - We have a split of seem vs seems in certain options though it may not be a decisive split. I would like to understand how is seem accurate in B? If I replace it with seems in B because the subject is "The fact" i.e singular, sentence does look awkward but I don't know the exact reasoning of choosing seem vs seems in both B and other choices?

I'll really appreciate if experts could pitch in with their thoughts on this.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2911
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2016, 04:07
1
sk5002 wrote:
Hi Experts,

I got this question correct but I'm trying to understand some of the nuances here.

1) Usage of almost solely - In the correct choice, almost modifies solely and suggests that they are almost alone/on their own in rocky mountains. But in choices C and D, 'solely almost' flips the modifier relationship. Now, in latter, solely modifies almost though I'm still struggling what would that mean. Does my reasoning sound accurate?

2) Usage of seem - We have a split of seem vs seems in certain options though it may not be a decisive split. I would like to understand how is seem accurate in B? If I replace it with seems in B because the subject is "The fact" i.e singular, sentence does look awkward but I don't know the exact reasoning of choosing seem vs seems in both B and other choices?

I'll really appreciate if experts could pitch in with their thoughts on this.


1. Yes, "solely almost" is meaningless in options C and E.
2. "Seem" is not the verb in this option.The verb is "would make", which refers to the singular subject "the fact". "Seem" is here an infinitive object (without "to") for the verb "would make". Consider the following example:

Sunny weather makes me feel happy.
A few consecutive sunny days make me feel happy.

The infinitive "feel" does not change with the change in number of the subject, only the verb "make" changes with the subject.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 71
Schools: Tuck '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2016, 12:38
what about 'it' in option B?

"The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers"

To whom does 'it' refers to?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2911
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2016, 10:52
1
1
sudhirgupta93 wrote:
what about 'it' in option B?

"The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers"

To whom does 'it' refers to?


"It" here is acting as a placeholder, not a typical pronoun. A placeholder "it" is used to shift an awkward subject phrase or an object phrase to the end of the sentence. A placeholder "it" does not refer to a noun antecedent. Consider this example:

"It seems that it is going to rain". Here "It" holds the position of "that it is going to rain": "That it is going to rain seems" is awkward and hence the placeholder "it" is used.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 180
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2016, 12:56
Adding up to the Expert's previous explanations

B. The fact that elk ... live ... in the ... Mountains would make [The fact] seem that they are mountain dwellers, but



After verbs such as INSIST, SUGGEST, RECOMMEND etc.
source: http://www.grammaring.com/present-subjunctive

That + Clause with plain form verb

SINGULAR
The plain form verb (simple, base form) is used in the clause after that (a subordinator) for first, second and third person singular.

source: http://www.grammar-quizzes.com/clause3.html
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 118
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.38
Reviews Badge
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2016, 11:55
sayantanc2k wrote:
sudhirgupta93 wrote:
what about 'it' in option B?

"The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers"

To whom does 'it' refers to?


"It" here is acting as a placeholder, not a typical pronoun. A placeholder "it" is used to shift an awkward subject phrase or an object phrase to the end of the sentence. A placeholder "it" does not refer to a noun antecedent. Consider this example:

"It seems that it is going to rain". Here "It" holds the position of "that it is going to rain": "That it is going to rain seems" is awkward and hence the placeholder "it" is used.



Hi,

How can we differentiate between the usage of it as " placeholder" or"pronoun"
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2911
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2016, 13:51
1
2
1988achilles wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
sudhirgupta93 wrote:
what about 'it' in option B?

"The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers"

To whom does 'it' refers to?


"It" here is acting as a placeholder, not a typical pronoun. A placeholder "it" is used to shift an awkward subject phrase or an object phrase to the end of the sentence. A placeholder "it" does not refer to a noun antecedent. Consider this example:

"It seems that it is going to rain". Here "It" holds the position of "that it is going to rain": "That it is going to rain seems" is awkward and hence the placeholder "it" is used.



Hi,

How can we differentiate between the usage of it as " placeholder" or"pronoun"


Broadly there are 4 uses of placeholder "it":

1. Postponing a subject:
1a. "that" clause subject: It is good that you came.
1b: infinitive subject: It is good to see you.

2. Postponing an object:
2a. "that" clause object: Make it sure that you come.
2b. infinitive object: Make it sure to come.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Mar 2017
Posts: 12
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2017, 00:36
1
mejia401 wrote:
Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.

First look: Grammatical construction, logical predication - In general, anytime there is a cause and effect relationship, test-makers have a field day in switching the position of relationship so as to form other answer choices. Typically, if the relationship is constructed with appropriate verb forms, the inverted relationship stands. That said, it's important to stay disciplined and test each clause for its proper components - i.e. verb form, logic predication, etc.

A. Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while "while" signifies at the same time and "ranged once" was past tense, so I thought the sentence was illogical.

B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but Correct - "They" agree with the pronoun in the non-underlined section of the sentence. The sentence is inherently wordy, so I looked for a better one first.

C. It would seem that elk would be mountain dwellers because of their living now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, but still Wrong - "But still" is redundant. "Because of their living" is awkward and nonsensical. "solely almost" is reversed and non-sensical.

D. Now living almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, it would seem that elk were mountain dwellers, although Wrong - "Now living" is an dangling modifier.

E. It seems that elk would be mountain dwellers from the fact that they now live solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, since "Solely almost" is reversed, awkward, and non-sensical. Also, I think this answer choice is wordy


Hi,

Can you help me understand how we identify the antecedent of a pronoun? For example, in option B, both "Elk" and "Rocky Mountains" are plural, so why can't "they" refer to "Rocky Mountains" ?

Thanks...
_________________

"You can help me achieve my goal by sharing your knowledge"

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4625
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2017, 02:52
Top Contributor
VishalOne wrote

Quote:
Can you help me understand how we identify the antecedent of a pronoun? For example, in option B, both "Elk" and "Rocky Mountains" are plural, so why can't "they" refer to "Rocky Mountains"?


B. The fact that Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but

Let's replace the pronoun in question with possible contenders and see which makes sense.
1. The fact that Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that the Rocky Mountains are mountain dwellers, but

2. The fact that Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that Elk are mountain dwellers, but


It is clear why the mountains cannot be the referent for 'they'
_________________

you can know a lot about something but not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it &nbs [#permalink] 11 Jun 2017, 02:52

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 27 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron
Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.