Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 08:05 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 08:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
akela
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
5,929
 [14]
Given Kudos: 128
Products:
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 5,929
 [14]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
auradediligodo
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2021
Posts: 364
Own Kudos:
835
 [2]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Akshay517
Joined: 07 Jun 2019
Last visit: 27 Jan 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
28
 [4]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V25
GPA: 3.59
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V25
Posts: 13
Kudos: 28
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
georgioskonst
Joined: 22 Jan 2019
Last visit: 08 Jun 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 18
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Akshay517
Can anyone explain why D is wrong?
If there is trust among the nations, then there is no need to singlehandedly bear the costs of reducing fossil fuel consumption.


There is not mistrust between the countries. Trust is not the problem !

However, every country needs to agree to set those emission rules and set apart the economic point.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,720
Own Kudos:
2,259
 [2]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,720
Kudos: 2,259
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Environmentalist: The excessive atmospheric buildup of carbon dioxide, which threatens the welfare of everyone in the world, can be stopped only by reducing the burning of fossil fuels. Any country imposing the strict emission standards on the industrial burning of such fuels that this reduction requires, however, would thereby reduce its gross national product. No nation will be willing to bear singlehandedly the costs of an action that will benefit everyone. It is obvious, then, that the catastrophic consequences of excessive atmospheric carbon dioxide are unavoidable unless _______.

Which one of the following most logically completes the argument?

(A) all nations become less concerned with pollution than with the economic burdens of preventing it - WRONG. Opposite to what passage suggests.
(B) multinational corporations agree to voluntary strict emission standards - WRONG. Countries turned to multinational corporations. 
(C) international agreements produce industrial emission standards - CORRECT. Best among the lot. 
(D) distrust among nations is eliminated - WRONG. Distrust is irrelevant. 
(E) a world government is established - WRONG. Just like D it's irrelevant.

Answer C.
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 534
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,193
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 534
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think option B is wrong as the argument specifically deals with "industrial" burning of fuels, multinational corporations in (B) might not fall in that category.
Option D is wrong as there is no info given on "distrust", maybe it doesn't exist already.


akela
Environmentalist: The excessive atmospheric buildup of carbon dioxide, which threatens the welfare of everyone in the world, can be stopped only by reducing the burning of fossil fuels. Any country imposing the strict emission standards on the industrial burning of such fuels that this reduction requires, however, would thereby reduce its gross national product. No nation will be willing to bear singlehandedly the costs of an action that will benefit everyone. It is obvious, then, that the catastrophic consequences of excessive atmospheric carbon dioxide are unavoidable unless _______.

Which one of the following most logically completes the argument?

(A) all nations become less concerned with pollution than with the economic burdens of preventing it
(B) multinational corporations agree to voluntary strict emission standards
(C) international agreements produce industrial emission standards
(D) distrust among nations is eliminated
(E) a world government is established
avatar
ironfury
Joined: 01 Feb 2025
Last visit: 29 Oct 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 79
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey experts could you help me eliminate option e
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts