Last visit was: 27 Jul 2024, 01:32 It is currently 27 Jul 2024, 01:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1232
Own Kudos [?]: 4863 [8]
Given Kudos: 128
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 731 [2]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2019
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [4]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V25
GPA: 3.59
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jan 2019
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: Environmentalist: The excessive atmospheric buildup of carbon dioxide, [#permalink]
Akshay517 wrote:
Can anyone explain why D is wrong?
If there is trust among the nations, then there is no need to singlehandedly bear the costs of reducing fossil fuel consumption.



There is not mistrust between the countries. Trust is not the problem !

However, every country needs to agree to set those emission rules and set apart the economic point.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2629
Own Kudos [?]: 1875 [0]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Environmentalist: The excessive atmospheric buildup of carbon dioxide, [#permalink]
Environmentalist: The excessive atmospheric buildup of carbon dioxide, which threatens the welfare of everyone in the world, can be stopped only by reducing the burning of fossil fuels. Any country imposing the strict emission standards on the industrial burning of such fuels that this reduction requires, however, would thereby reduce its gross national product. No nation will be willing to bear singlehandedly the costs of an action that will benefit everyone. It is obvious, then, that the catastrophic consequences of excessive atmospheric carbon dioxide are unavoidable unless _______.

Which one of the following most logically completes the argument?

(A) all nations become less concerned with pollution than with the economic burdens of preventing it - WRONG. Opposite to what passage suggests.
(B) multinational corporations agree to voluntary strict emission standards - WRONG. Countries turned to multinational corporations. 
(C) international agreements produce industrial emission standards - CORRECT. Best among the lot. 
(D) distrust among nations is eliminated - WRONG. Distrust is irrelevant. 
(E) a world government is established - WRONG. Just like D it's irrelevant.

Answer C.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Environmentalist: The excessive atmospheric buildup of carbon dioxide, [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6985 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts