axezcole
THE PROMPTEven though the beauty of America’s national parks
can be witnessed by simply driving through it, experiencing a park at its best require one to spend time in exploring the forests, meadows, deserts, rivers, and mountains on a more intimate scale.
The subject of the sentence is
beauty—the prepositional phrase
of America's national parks tells us where that beauty is.
The sentence conveys two major ideas about this beauty. Idea #1 is subordinate to Idea #2.
Idea #1: the beauty can be witnessed [by a person] simply by driving through the parks
Idea #2: [although #1 is true], in order to experience the park['s beauty] at its best, a person must spend time [on foot, presumably] in exploring the forests, meadows, etc. "on a more intimate scale."
On a more intimate scale means either on a smaller scale (the whole park vs, parts in it) or in a closer manner (as in, the spatial distance between you and the things is not interrupted by a car). Let's say "more closely."
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) Even though the
beauty of America’s national parks
can be witnessed by simply driving through it, experiencing a park at its best require one to spend time in exploring the forests, meadows, deserts, rivers, and mountains on a more intimate scale.
•
driving through it is incorrect:
(1) you cannot drive through beauty, and
(2)
it should be
them, which would properly refer to parks.
-- The antecedent of a pronoun can lie in a prepositional phrase.
•
experiencing is a gerund (a verbING, a verb-like noun). Gerunds are always singular. The verb
require is plural. S/V disagreement.
Eliminate A
Quote:
B. Even though the beauty of America’s national parks
is witnessed by simply driving through them, experiencing a park at its best requires spending time in exploring the forests, meadows, deserts, rivers, and mountains on a more intimate scale.
•
is witnessed by whom? Whereas
can be witnessed implies "it's possible [for a person] to see the beauty,"
is witnessed implies nonsensically that the beauty is = only witnessed by driving through the park.
• requires can take a gerund, but at this point we have no subjects and a lot of sluggish __ING words (when __ING words function as nouns, they often weigh sentences down)
• You know, sometimes sentences are so frustratingly bad in terms of style that . . .
• this sentence has no agents who could actually witness, drive, or experience nature on a more intimate scale. KEEP, but look for a better answer.
Quote:
C. Even though the beauty of America’s national parks
witnessed by simply driving through them [missing verb], experiencing them at its best requires that one spend time in exploring the forests, meadows, deserts, rivers, and mountains on a more intimate scale.
• The
even though clause is missing a helping verb (can be)
•
its is incorrect.
Them refers to parks. The correct phrase would be
at their best Quote:
D. Even though the beauty of America’s national
parks can be witnessed by simply driving through them, experiencing a park at its best requires that one spend time in exploring the forests, meadows, deserts, rivers, and mountains on a more intimate scale.
• them correctly refers to parks
• experiencing, singular, correctly takes the singular verb requires
• requires is a "bossy" verb that takes the command subjunctive structure
Command subjunctive structure:
[bossy verb] + [THAT] + [subject] + [bare infinitive]We have
[requires] + [THAT] + [one] + [spend]
-- Correct.
-- The infinitive is TO SPEND. The bare infinitive simply drops the word "to": SPEND
Infinitive: TO WALK. Bare infinitive: WALK
KEEP
Quote:
E. Even though the beauty of America’s national parks
can be witnessed by simply driving through it, experiencing a park at its best requires that one spends time in exploring the forests, meadows, deserts, rivers, and mountains on a more intimate scale.
• same problem as that in A: you cannot drive through beauty, and
it should be
them in order to refer to
parks• command subjunctive is constructed incorrectly—
spends should be
spendSee the construction above, in D.
We need the bare infinitive. Infinitive: TO SPEND. Bare infinitive: SPEND.
Eliminate E
Option B v Option D? No contest. D wins.
• beauty
can be witnessed makes much more sense than beauty
is witnessed
-- IS witnessed is declarative and present tense; the construction confuses me for a moment because I read that the [only?] way to witness beauty is to drive through the park, but then I read that in order to witness the park at its best I should not be in my car.
• there is a difference between correct passive construction (which is
frequently correct on the GMAT) and utterly agent-less construction.
Option B has no people, not even generic ones, to do this witnessing and experiencing.
• Option B is not as forceful as D.
XYZ
requires that one spend time in exploring
is more forceful than
XYZ
requires spending time in exploring
-- spend is more forceful than spending. Active verbs typically enliven sentences.
-- use gerunds (verbING words, verb-like nouns) sparingly.
As noun forms, gerunds are not the same as comma + participle (also called verbING in egmat's method, I think).
The latter are adverbial modifiers of previous clauses and are very effective at presenting additional information.
The answer is D