pranjalpathak07
generis
Even with the proposed budget cuts and new taxes and fees, the city's projected deficit for the next budget year is getting worse: administration officials announced that they believe the gap will be $3.7 billion, a billion dollars over what it was predicted just two months ago.
A) over what it was predicted
B) over the prediction from
C) more than it was predicted
D) more than they had predicted
E) more than they predicted it
SC25540.02
Dear experts
1.Option (D) - the correct one- results in the following sentence:
...,a billion dollars over what it was predicted just two months ago...But here we can clearly see
"two months ago" which specifies that
the prediction was done before the current time. Therefore, the use of HAD should be incorrect!
One thing I have found interesting about tense is that it's not easy for a tense to be incorrect, because when one chooses a tense, one is choosing a meaning, and many possible meanings can be logical.
In this case, it could even be that the question writer knows that we all know that the past perfect (had) is unnecessary when the time sequence is clear and is messing with us.
Here's an excerpt from the (D) version.
announced that they believe the gap will be $3.7 billion, a billion dollars more than they had predicted just two months ago.
There are two things that could be going on here. One is that the writer decided that, even though "had" is unnecessary when the time sequence is clear, it's acceptable to use "had." GMAT SC question writers often push the boundaries of what's acceptable and don't write perfect sentences, and this writer may have decided that the (D) version is the best version rather than an ideal version and that the use of "had" is not a fatal error.
Another, cooler, thing that may be going on is the following. The writer may have considered "two months ago" a point in time at which "they" had ALREADY "predicted." In that case, the use of "had" is not incorrect. Rather it results in a meaning different from the one that would be conveyed if the simple past were used.
Consider his similar situation.
Two months ago, when we were talking about John, John had been predicted to fail, but now it's clear that he will likely succeed.
Time sequence: John was predicted to fail --> two months ago --> now
Time sequence in (D) version: they predicted --> two months ago --> now
Quote:
2. In OG, it says that
the import of "it" is unclear in option (C)!? However, it is clear that "it" refers to
"the gap" [any other noun will not fit].
Regarding "it" in the (C) version, while "it" may refer to "gap," if we go with that interpretation, the sentence is not logical.
Notice that "a billion dollars more than
the gap was predicted" illogically compares an amount of money to a clause, "the gap was predicted," as in "
3.7 billion dollars is a billion dollars more than
the gap was predicted."
So, "it" can't really refer to "gap."