The answer is A. We'll tackle this question using the
Alternative
approach, as we are asked to compare the answers.
it's crucial to notice we are looking for the statement that works the LEAST - that is, one which points in the opposite direction than what we are told: the US suffering far more from fires than Japan.
A. Significantly more money per capita is spent each year on fire-prevention efforts in the United States than is spent on such efforts in Japan. -
yes! This would lead us to expect that the situation in the US would be better, not worse - it does the opposite than explainingB. The rate of arson, a major contributor to fire statistics in the United States, is almost negligible in Japan.
No - this is a contributing factor: it leads us to expect the situation on the US to be worse than in Japan C. Most Japanese homes, unlike those in the United States, are equipped with specially designed and effective fire-extinguishing equipment.
No - this is a contributing factor: it leads us to expect the situation on the US to be worse than in Japan D. Foam-based and plastic furniture, less popular in Japan than in the United States, ignites
readily and releases twice the heat energy of equivalent weights of natural fibers.
No - this is a contributing factor: it leads us to expect the situation on the US to be worse than in Japan E. Japanese fire departments devote proportionately more personnel time to inspection,
training, and public education than do United States fire departments.
No - this is a contributing factor: it leads us to expect the situation on the US to be worse than in Japan