Last visit was: 26 Jul 2024, 21:10 It is currently 26 Jul 2024, 21:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 May 2012
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 692 [66]
Given Kudos: 114
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Status:Manager
Affiliations: Manager
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 418 [18]
Given Kudos: 111
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 3
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Oct 2014
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 1861 [9]
Given Kudos: 188
Send PM
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 424
Own Kudos [?]: 269 [2]
Given Kudos: 43
Schools: Cambridge'16
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Supporter assumption: Closing dozen stores in 6 months is indicator of losing money in year

Defender assumption: No factors that could stop losing money by the end of year exist

C fits defender
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2015
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Finance
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I think answer should be E, As we are talking about "Capital Coffee is losing money this year" and E is talking about no profit and if we negate also then its weaken the author's claim.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2013
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 67 [3]
Given Kudos: 115
Send PM
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Assumption plugs the gap between the premise and the logical jump made in the conclusion.
With this is mind, I used the following reasoning to eliminate B.

Evidence - Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide
**GAP**closure need not indicate loss of money**it may be a strategy**
Conclusion - Capital Coffee is losing money this year

Evidence - Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide
**store closings were due to low sales volume** but what if profit was high?
Conclusion - Capital Coffee is losing money this year

hence the gap is still not closed. Low sales volume may not mean lower profits...Profit could have been HIGH.
So the conclusion that Capital Coffee is losing money is still doubtful.

I used the following reasoning to eliminate E.
option E - None of Capital Coffee's recently-closed stores had turned a profit in the last two years.
If none were making profit, then the conclusion "Capital Coffee is losing money this year."
is not correct.
So this option does not fill the gap.


hope this is correct. Experts pls comment.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 15159
Own Kudos [?]: 66909 [3]
Given Kudos: 436
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Success2015 wrote:
Assumption plugs the gap between the premise and the logical jump made in the conclusion.
With this is mind, I used the following reasoning to eliminate B.

Evidence - Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide
**GAP**closure need not indicate loss of money**it may be a strategy**
Conclusion - Capital Coffee is losing money this year

Evidence - Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide
**store closings were due to low sales volume** but what if profit was high?
Conclusion - Capital Coffee is losing money this year

hence the gap is still not closed. Low sales volume may not mean lower profits...Profit could have been HIGH.
So the conclusion that Capital Coffee is losing money is still doubtful.

I used the following reasoning to eliminate E.
option E - None of Capital Coffee's recently-closed stores had turned a profit in the last two years.
If none were making profit, then the conclusion "Capital Coffee is losing money this year."
is not correct.
So this option does not fill the gap.


hope this is correct. Experts pls comment.


Yes, correct.

The argument says that CC has closed many stores. The implication is that CC is losing money this year. There are many assumptions here. Any of the below could lead to more money inspite of closing 3 dozen stores.
CC has opened more than 3 dozen new stores.
CC's flagship stores which are running are suddenly doing a lot of extra business and hence the manpower has been diverted (i.e. some strategy based closure)

So (C) is the correct answer.

Issues with B - The use of the word "All". It is not necessary that all store closings were because of low sales. Even if most were because of low sales, CC could be losing money. Also, "low sales volume" and "low sales" are different. Low sales volume may not make a store close if profitability is still quite high.

Issues with (E) - The use of the word "None". It is possible that 1 or 2 were returning profits but their prospects were weak and hence the stores were closed. Also, two years is way too specific. We are not assuming that there was no profit for 2 years. A store could be closed even if it made no profit in one year or even if it did make profit.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2014
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 20 [0]
Given Kudos: 194
Send PM
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Success2015 wrote:
Assumption plugs the gap between the premise and the logical jump made in the conclusion.
With this is mind, I used the following reasoning to eliminate B.

Evidence - Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide
**GAP**closure need not indicate loss of money**it may be a strategy**
Conclusion - Capital Coffee is losing money this year

Evidence - Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide
**store closings were due to low sales volume** but what if profit was high?
Conclusion - Capital Coffee is losing money this year

hence the gap is still not closed. Low sales volume may not mean lower profits...Profit could have been HIGH.
So the conclusion that Capital Coffee is losing money is still doubtful.

I used the following reasoning to eliminate E.
option E - None of Capital Coffee's recently-closed stores had turned a profit in the last two years.
If none were making profit, then the conclusion "Capital Coffee is losing money this year."
is not correct.
So this option does not fill the gap.


hope this is correct. Experts pls comment.


Yes, correct.

The argument says that CC has closed many stores. The implication is that CC is losing money this year. There are many assumptions here. Any of the below could lead to more money inspite of closing 3 dozen stores.
CC has opened more than 3 dozen new stores.
CC's flagship stores which are running are suddenly doing a lot of extra business and hence the manpower has been diverted (i.e. some strategy based closure)

So (C) is the correct answer.

Issues with B - The use of the word "All". It is not necessary that all store closings were because of low sales. Even if most were because of low sales, CC could be losing money. Also, "low sales volume" and "low sales" are different. Low sales volume may not make a store close if profitability is still quite high.

Issues with (E) - The use of the word "None". It is possible that 1 or 2 were returning profits but their prospects were weak and hence the stores were closed. Also, two years is way too specific. We are not assuming that there was no profit for 2 years. A store could be closed even if it made no profit in one year or even if it did make profit.

Can we use negation in this question, if yes then kindly explain
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2145
Own Kudos [?]: 1192 [0]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
aashu4uiit wrote:
Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year. In just the last six months, Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide, and may even need to close more in the future.


i usually don't like assumptions type of questions, but this one seemed pretty easy...
identified 2 possible assumptions:
1. closure of the three dozen ones was not the result of a plan to extend the operations in the existing, opened stores. what if the company decided to concentrate in a specific region only, where the sales are so high that the losses from closure of the 36 ones is not felt at all?
2. CC did not open in the same year >36 stores. what if CC closed 36 stores because it decided to relocate them? m?

The advisor's claim rests on which of the following assumptions?

a) Domestic coffee sales are outperforming international sales.
outside of the scope

b) All of the store closings were made necessary by low sales volume.
irrelevant

c) Capital Coffee has not opened more than three dozen stores this year.
bingo!

d) All major coffee retailers are losing money this year.
what others are doing is not our concern.

e) None of Capital Coffee's recently-closed stores had turned a profit in the last two years.
irrelevant.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2145
Own Kudos [?]: 1192 [0]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
sharma123 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Success2015 wrote:
Assumption plugs the gap between the premise and the logical jump made in the conclusion.
With this is mind, I used the following reasoning to eliminate B.

Evidence - Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide
**GAP**closure need not indicate loss of money**it may be a strategy**
Conclusion - Capital Coffee is losing money this year

Evidence - Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide
**store closings were due to low sales volume** but what if profit was high?
Conclusion - Capital Coffee is losing money this year

hence the gap is still not closed. Low sales volume may not mean lower profits...Profit could have been HIGH.
So the conclusion that Capital Coffee is losing money is still doubtful.

I used the following reasoning to eliminate E.
option E - None of Capital Coffee's recently-closed stores had turned a profit in the last two years.
If none were making profit, then the conclusion "Capital Coffee is losing money this year."
is not correct.
So this option does not fill the gap.


hope this is correct. Experts pls comment.


Yes, correct.

The argument says that CC has closed many stores. The implication is that CC is losing money this year. There are many assumptions here. Any of the below could lead to more money inspite of closing 3 dozen stores.
CC has opened more than 3 dozen new stores.
CC's flagship stores which are running are suddenly doing a lot of extra business and hence the manpower has been diverted (i.e. some strategy based closure)

So (C) is the correct answer.

Issues with B - The use of the word "All". It is not necessary that all store closings were because of low sales. Even if most were because of low sales, CC could be losing money. Also, "low sales volume" and "low sales" are different. Low sales volume may not make a store close if profitability is still quite high.

Issues with (E) - The use of the word "None". It is possible that 1 or 2 were returning profits but their prospects were weak and hence the stores were closed. Also, two years is way too specific. We are not assuming that there was no profit for 2 years. A store could be closed even if it made no profit in one year or even if it did make profit.

Can we use negation in this question, if yes then kindly explain


yes, negation test can be used here, but it is recommended to use it after we eliminate at least 2-3 incorrect answer choices.

suppose we are left with C and E.

negate C:
CC opened more than 36 stores. CC closed ~36 stores.
let's say opened 40, closed 38. we have in total +2 stores. +2 stores => more $. so conclusion is not validated in this case.

negate E:
Some stores made profit - some might be 1 or might be all...what if out of 38, only 1 made profit, and 37 not? well...CC lost money
what if all 38 made profit, but all 38 were closed? CC did not lose money.
2 possible outcomes - can't be the right answer.
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 976
Own Kudos [?]: 187 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Send PM
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
aashu4uiit wrote:
Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year. In just the last six months, Capital Coffee has closed over three dozen stores nationwide, and may even need to close more in the future.


The Advisor's claim rests on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Domestic coffee sales are outperforming international sales.
This is thoroughly out of context and doesn't impact the passage the slightest

(B) All of the store closings were made necessary by low sales volume.
There may be other reasons we just know about the same therefore out

(C) Capital Coffee has not opened more than three dozen stores this year.
If it has to close 3 dozen plus stores , the above action can only be implemented if that many stores existed therefore our option

(D) All major coffee retailers are losing money this year.
This might and might not be the case therefore out

(E) None of Capital Coffee's recently-closed stores had turned a profit in the last two years.
It might have turned profitable but individually it might be otherwise
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Nov 2023
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 103
Send PM
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
Can anyone explain how to use the "negate technique" in critical reasoning?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Financial Advisor: Clearly, Capital Coffee is losing money this year [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6985 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts