Apr 27 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Apr 28 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes. Apr 29 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join a free live webinar and learn timemanagement tactics that will guarantee you answer all questions, in all sections, on time. Save your spot today! May 01 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Target Test Prep is kicking off spring with a fresh giveaway contest! For a limited time, you have a chance to win 4 months of full, FREE access to our 5star rated GMAT Quant course.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54543

Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively p
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jan 2015, 07:44
Question Stats:
62% (01:57) correct 38% (02:08) wrong based on 140 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively purchased a total of 16 pounds of fudge. Did any one friend purchase more than 5 pounds of fudge? (1) No two friends purchased the same amount of fudge. (2) The minimum increment in which the chocolatier sells fudge is one pound. Kudos for a correct solution.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 165
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GMAT 1: 590 Q40 V30 GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Project Management (Entertainment and Sports)

Re: Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively p
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jan 2015, 08:12
Bunuel wrote: Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively purchased a total of 16 pounds of fudge. Did any one friend purchase more than 5 pounds of fudge?
(1) No two friends purchased the same amount of fudge.
(2) The minimum increment in which the chocolatier sells fudge is one pound.
Kudos for a correct solution. Let's calculate the average pound per person > 3,2. 1) set up two sets S=(a; b; c; d; e) and set Q=(f; g; h; i; j). No two friends purchased the same amount of fudge. We expect \(a+b+c+d+e = f+g+h+i+j=16\). Assume S (1; 2; 3; 4; 6) the answer to our question is yes. Assume Q (3,2; 3,3; 3,4; 3,5; 2,6) the answer to our question is no. 2) set up two sets S and Z. Assume S (1; 2; 3; 4; 6) the answer to our question is yes; assume Z (3; 3; 3; 3; 4) the answer to our question is no. 1+2) minimum increment is one. Set Q is not acceptable, thus the answer is C. hope it helps
_________________
learn the rules of the game, then play better than anyone else.



Intern
Joined: 27 Mar 2014
Posts: 22

Re: Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively p
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jan 2015, 10:07
The two statement is contradict. So the answer must A, B, D, E.
S1/ The average fudge/people is 16/5 = 3.2 All can less than 5, regardless of any equal value.
s2/ Suppose we don't have any person buy more than 5. So the most fudge bought by a person must be 5. The increment is at least 1. So the other value could be 4, 3, 2, 1. Total is 15 => Supposing statement is incorrect. There must be one person bought more than 5 pounds.
Some thing like Dirichlet distribution.
Answer: B



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7589

Re: Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively p
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jan 2015, 10:16
Icerockboom wrote: The two statement is contradict. So the answer must A, B, D, E.
S1/ The average fudge/people is 16/5 = 3.2 All can less than 5, regardless of any equal value.
s2/ Suppose we don't have any person buy more than 5. So the most fudge bought by a person must be 5. The increment is at least 1. So the other value could be 4, 3, 2, 1. Total is 15 => Supposing statement is incorrect. There must be one person bought more than 5 pounds.
Some thing like Dirichlet distribution.
Answer: B ans C ...you are missing the point where some of them buy same no of fudge for eg 4,4,4,2,2, STATEMENT 2 ALONE WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT
_________________



Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2014
Posts: 66
Location: United States

Re: Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively p
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jan 2015, 20:18
Sum of 5 friends=16 pounds Question: Did any one of the friends buy >5 pounds?
(1) No two same amounts: Answer to the question is YES: (6, 1,2,3,4) Answer to the question is NO: (1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4, 4.5) Two possible answers, hence insufficient.
(2) The minimum amount is 1 pound. YES: (6, 1,2,3,4) NO: (4,4,4,2,2) Insufficient.
(1)+(2) The only case that satisfy both statements is (6, 1,2,3,4) Answer C



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54543

Re: Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively p
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jan 2015, 04:47
Bunuel wrote: Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively purchased a total of 16 pounds of fudge. Did any one friend purchase more than 5 pounds of fudge?
(1) No two friends purchased the same amount of fudge.
(2) The minimum increment in which the chocolatier sells fudge is one pound.
Kudos for a correct solution. VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:In this Min/Max problem, your goal is to determine whether the minimum value of the highest total can or must be greater than 5. Statement 1 is not sufficient largely because the question (as statement 2 hints) does not prohibit fractional pounds, so the 16 total pounds can be distributed with all values under 5 (for example, 1, 2, 3, 4.4, and 4.6) or with one value well above 5 (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and the rest all going to the large value). Statement 2 serves as a check against statement 1 ("Why Are You Here?") but is not sufficient on its own. But taken together, the statements tell you that the five values must be unique integers. To get to 15 total (one less than the question's mandated 16 pounds), there are really two ways: Minimize the low value at 0, which guarantees that one value has to be above 5 (0, 1, 2, 3 for the lower 4, or 0, 2, 3, 4 all require that the high value is over 5). or Maximize the low value at 1, which gives the distribution 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. But since there is a 16th pound, and by adding one to any of the values 14 you'd match one of the higher values, the extra pound must go to the high value, meaning that even if you maximize the lower values, the minimum high value must be 6. Accordingly, the statements together guarantee the answer "yes" and the answer is C.
_________________



Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2556
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively p
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2017, 15:21
I chose A till i read the second statement...clearly the answer is C, as the only option that could be: 1,2,3,4,6




Five friends recently visited a famous chocolatier, and collectively p
[#permalink]
01 Aug 2017, 15:21






