Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:08 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Basshead
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 925
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 432
Location: United States
Posts: 925
Kudos: 302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rrn98
Joined: 03 Sep 2021
Last visit: 13 Dec 2022
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Location: Peru
Posts: 14
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rrn98
Joined: 03 Sep 2021
Last visit: 13 Dec 2022
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Location: Peru
Posts: 14
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you so much MartyTargetTestPrep
I have an additional doubt: why is B wrong?
Quote:
(B) Impairment of linguistic capabilities does not occur in people who have not suffered any damage to any language center of the brain.

I'd think that it would help to understand that linguistic capabilities impairment in one side of the brain is caused by a stroke in said side of the brain. If impairment can happen due to other causes its effect wouldn't be quite clear right?
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rrn98
Thank you so much MartyTargetTestPrep
I have an additional doubt: why is B wrong?
Quote:
(B) Impairment of linguistic capabilities does not occur in people who have not suffered any damage to any language center of the brain.

I'd think that it would help to understand that linguistic capabilities impairment in one side of the brain is caused by a stroke in said side of the brain. If impairment can happen due to other causes its effect wouldn't be quite clear right?
Notice that the underlying idea here is not that, IF there is impairment, THEN there must be damage.

The underlying idea is that, IF there is damage, THEN there is impairment.

After all, the author concludes, "people who have suffered a serious stroke on the left side of the brain without suffering any such impairment must have their language centers in the right half."

We can see that the author's underlying idea is that, if a person has NOT suffered impairment of linguistic capabilities, then there must not be damage to the person's language centers.

The author does not have to assume that there is no other way for such impairment to occur in order to arrive at this conclusion about a situation in which such impairment has not occurred.
User avatar
muralis18
Joined: 08 Dec 2021
Last visit: 01 May 2023
Posts: 21
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 21
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I wanted to know the reason behind option D to be correct.

Isn't it already stated in the passage that when the language barrier is damaged by stroke, linguistic capabilities are impaired -> "When a language center of the brain is damaged, for example by a stroke, linguistic capabilities are impaired in some way"

So stroke damages the language barrier to causes impairment.

And option D just restates the same -> stroke damages at least one of the language barriers.

Experts' opinions on this would be helpful, to fill any logic gaps that I'm missing.

Best.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
muralis18
I wanted to know the reason behind option D to be correct.

Isn't it already stated in the passage that when the language barrier is damaged by stroke, linguistic capabilities are impaired -> "When a language center of the brain is damaged, for example by a stroke, linguistic capabilities are impaired in some way"

So stroke damages the language barrier to causes impairment.

And option D just restates the same -> stroke damages at least one of the language barriers.

Experts' opinions on this would be helpful, to fill any logic gaps that I'm missing.

Best.
Let's look again at the two statements you quoted above.

Here's what the passage says:

When a language center of the brain is damaged, for example by a stroke, linguistic capabilities are impaired in some way.

So, IF damage to language center, THEN linguistic capabilities are impaired.

Here's what choice (D) says:

(D) If there are language centers on the left side of the brain, any serious stroke affecting that side of the brain damages at least one of them.

So, IF language centers, THEN stroke damages them.

We can see that the two statements are actually quite different.

Now, let's consider the conclusion of the argument:

people who have suffered a serious stroke on the left side of the brain without suffering any such impairment must have their language centers in the right half.

So, IF stroke on left side + no impairment, THEN language centers on right side.

Notice that the author is assuming that stroke on left side = damage to language centers on the left side, which is basically what (D) says.
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 805
Kudos: 170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Understanding the argument -
For most people, the left half of the brain controls linguistic capabilities, but some people have their language centers in the right half. - Fact.
When a language center of the brain is damaged, for example by a stroke, linguistic capabilities are impaired in some way. Fact
Therefore, people who have suffered a serious stroke on the left side of the brain without suffering any such impairment must have their language centers in the right half. - Conclusion

What if one suffers a stroke and it doesn't impact linguistic capabilities? Then, can we say that "they must have their language centers in the right half"? No, we can't. That is what option D highlights.

Option Elimination - We need to find a missing premise or a minimum condition that can make the conclusion work: "people (who have suffered a serious stroke on the left side of the brain without suffering any such impairment) must have their language centers in the right half.

(A) No part of a person's brain that is damaged by a stroke ever recovers. - "Recovery" is in no way linked to the scope at hand, which is finding a missing premise to make the conclusion work, which is "people (who blah blah..) have their language centers in the right half. Out of scope.

(B) Impairment of linguistic capabilities does not occur in people who have not suffered any damage to any language center of the brain. - People "who have not suffered any damage to any language center of the brain" are not in scope. We are talking here about people "who have suffered a serious stroke on the left side of the brain without suffering any such impairment." Distortion.

(C) Strokes tend to impair linguistic capabilities more severely than does any other cause of damage to language centers in the brain. "other damages" is out of scope.

(D) If there are language centers on the left side of the brain, any serious stroke affecting that side of the brain damages at least one of them. - Yes. Negate the main clause "If there are language centers on the left side of the brain, any serious stroke affecting that side of the brain damages "none" of them." or "If there are language centers on the left side of the brain, there could be a serious stroke affecting that side of the brain without damaging any of them." Then the conclusion "people (who blah blah..) have their language centers in the right half" shatters.

(E) It is impossible to determine which side of the brain contains a person's language centers if the person has not suffered damage to either side of the brain. - At best, it can be a weakener. Opposite of what we need.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,833
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,833
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts