Last visit was: 16 Jul 2024, 12:42 It is currently 16 Jul 2024, 12:42
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damag

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2016
Posts: 207
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3507
Own Kudos [?]: 6978 [0]
Given Kudos: 500
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2018
Posts: 81
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 195
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: IIMA PGPX'22
GPA: 4
WE:Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Posts: 385
Own Kudos [?]: 42 [0]
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Re: For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damag [#permalink]

If we changed option C to "Claim", G residents are more likely to claim than F residents. Then can we say this would be a correct answer?
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Posts: 1731
Own Kudos [?]: 5913 [0]
Given Kudos: 3119
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Re: For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damag [#permalink]
krndatta wrote:

If we changed option C to "Claim", G residents are more likely to claim than F residents. Then can we say this would be a correct answer?

If this is the end result of the negation, then yes, per my initial explanation, that would be sufficient to ruin the argument.
Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2020
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 128
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q89 V86 DI81
Re: For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damag [#permalink]
I can deduce that option A is correct one only by looking at the conclusion. I want to know how the assumption is linking premise to the conclusion?
Tutor
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 1021
Own Kudos [?]: 2032 [1]
Given Kudos: 88
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Re: For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damag [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Piscine15 wrote:
I can deduce that option A is correct one only by looking at the conclusion. I want to know how the assumption is linking premise to the conclusion?

Here are the premises:

For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damage has always cost more in Greatport than in Fairmont.

Police studies, however, show that cars owned by Greatport residents are, on average, slightly less likely to be involved in a collision than cars in Fairmont.

Here's the conclusion that the premises support:

Clearly, therefore, insurance companies are making a greater profit on collision-damage insurance in Greatport than in Fairmont.

We see that the premises are about the "cost," or price, of automobile insurance for collision damage and the relative frequencies of collisions in Greatport and Fairmont.

Then the conclusion is about the "profit" of insurance companies.

So, the argument assumes that the conclusion about profit is supported by the premises about cost and frequency.

The correct answer, (A) Repairing typical collision damage does not cost more in Greatport than in Fairmont, connects the premises about cost and frequency to the conclusion about profit by filling in another piece of information that we need since, for insurance companies, profit = total cost of insurance - (frequency of collisions * cost of repairing typical collision damage).
Director
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 730
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damag [#permalink]
How they make more profits. Profits = Revenue - cost. The cost of repair has to be less. That's what A says.
The option C is a strengthener (it makes us believe more in the conclusion). We are not looking here for a strengthener but for an assumption, a necessary condition.
B - the number of motorists doesn't matter out of scope.
D - Out of scope.
E - We don't care if they are already aware. Out of scope
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2023
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 77
Re: For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damag [#permalink]
For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damage has always cost more in Greatport than in Fairmont. Police studies, however, show that cars owned by Greatport residents are, on average, slightly less likely to be involved in a collision than cars in Fairmont. Clearly, therefore, insurance companies are making a greater profit on collision-damage insurance in Greatport than in Fairmont.

P: For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damage has always cost more in Greatport than in Fairmont
P: Police studies, however, show that cars owned by Greatport residents are, on average, slightly less likely to be involved in a collision than cars in Fairmont
C: Therefore, insurance companies are making a greater profit on collision-damage insurance in Greatport than in Fairmont.

Greatport insurance more expensive than Fairmont. Less car accidents in G. Therefore, insurance makes more. Well, what if the cars are more expensive? This seems like the biggest assumption made so let's try and find it below.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Repairing typical collision damage does not cost more in Greatport than in Fairmont. -- I don't like it, but it is as close as we get. If the cars don't cost more to repair, then the insurance makes more money (huge assumption made). I wish this had said "insurance companies don't pay more", but we have to deal with it. For the negation, if they do cost more, the argument is ruined.

(B) There are no more motorists in Greatport than in Fairmont. -- But we are talking about averages, so we do not care about number of vehicles.

(C) Greatport residents who have been in a collision are NOT more likely to report it to their insurance company than Fairmont residents are. -- This is reversed to a certain extent. If this were the other way around, it would be an assumption (the argument would be destroyed because the comparison wouldn't be accurate). But if they are not more likely, then the numbers are correct and the accident rates are comparable.

(D) Fairmont and Greatport are NOT the cities with the highest collision-damage insurance rates. -- OK, but who cares about the rates of collision in the country or world? We just care about the comparison between the two cities listed.

(E) The insurance companies were NOT already aware of the difference in the likelihood of collisions before the publication of the police reports. -- Who cares if they were aware? The argument isn't about motivation, but the result. And the argument believes that the result is that G makes more money than F.

­Wont A strengthen the argument if we negate the sentence , Now in conclusion it is said that insurers are earning more profit in G vs F so technically wont this be a strengthener
Re: For similar cars and drivers, automobile insurance for collision damag [#permalink]
1   2
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6984 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts