GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 17 Feb 2020, 15:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61243
For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 00:44
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (01:30) correct 51% (01:36) wrong based on 170 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Competition Mode Question

For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994

D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate

E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

_________________
HEC & IMD School Moderator
Status: Preparing for GMAT
Joined: 16 Dec 2018
Posts: 720
Location: Italy
Schools: HEC'22 (J), IMD '22
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 01:08
1
1
For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate - Incorrect comma placement distorted the meaning.

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994 - The reverse order of 'both against' distorted the meaning.

C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994 - Correct, Clear Meaning

D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate - 'both' .. 'and' has to be used rather than 'as well as'. Apart from this issue, the incorrect placements of Comma changed the sentence into illogical

E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994 - 'both' .. 'and' has to be used rather than 'as well as'. Apart from this issue, the incorrect placements of Comma changed the sentence into illogical
_________________
Manager
Joined: 28 May 2019
Posts: 130
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 01:40
For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate
There is no main independent clause. This is a fragment.

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994
Both against is changing the meaning. It should be against both x and y

C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994

D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate
Against Indian and Chinese is concise and meaning is correct. If we say against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition this means against Indian competition and Chinese.

E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994
Same as D

_________________
Pick yourself up, dust yourself off, and start again.

Success is the sum of all small efforts.

MAKE IT HAPPEN
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 5919
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 02:28
1
IMO C;
In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994

co relative conjuction ; both x & y...

[url]For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate[/url], which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994

D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate

E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994
VP
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Posts: 1200
Location: United States
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 05:44
1
Quote:
For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate
B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994
C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994
D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate
E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

NOTES: "both against X and Y" is not parallel; What robber citizens? the introduction of subsidies.

Ans (C)
Retired Moderator
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5301
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 07:35
Top Contributor
Quote:
For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994

D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate

E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

This is a murky topic.

Choice A --- We can straightaway dismiss this choice, as it is fragment.

Choices C and D can be also dismissed since the Relative pronoun 'which' cannot modify the subsidies brushing aside the verbs before that.

B--- It is okay except that the word both should be placed just before the two adjectives rather than before the word 'against'.

In E, the placement various commas create plenty of confusion, in addition to the idiom for protecting' being inferior to the infinitive 'to protect' in B.
The benefit of doubt may perhaps favor E as the final choice, as commas are not considered critical in GMAT.
_________________
If you stumble into the SC pitfall and limp, spend two months with me one-to-one online and see yourself flying.+91 9884544509, <newnaren@gmail.com>
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Posts: 54
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 08:53
Ans: E
For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994
Director
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 683
Location: India
GMAT 1: 580 Q43 V27
WE: Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 09:03
1
For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate - WRONG. No verb in the sentence.

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994. - WRONG. Modifier issue with 'which'.

C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994 - CORRECT. 'Subsidies' is the subject here and 'which' modifies it correctly.

D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate - WRONG. Little wordy. Better options available.

E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994 - WRONG. 'For protecting' is wrong. Better option available.

_________________
Ephemeral Epiphany..!

GMATPREP1 590(Q48,V23) March 6, 2019
GMATPREP2 610(Q44,V29) June 10, 2019
GMATPREPSoft1 680(Q48,V35) June 26, 2019
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 223
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 09:29
My answer is (B). It took me 1 minute and 7 seconds.

(A) This version is a fragment, which can never be correct.
(B) This version uses clear and active constructs.
(C) Passive voice "subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994" is not called for.
(D) Again, passive voice is unnecessary. Also, "against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition" is too verbose.
(E) Again, "against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition" is too verbose.
Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2013
Posts: 12
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V32
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2020, 12:43
1
C ..
What is the OA ?

Meaning : To protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by Senate in 1994 . With this activity Senate robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate
-- Its an intention .. SO to protect is the correct form -- Out

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994
-- Both X and Y .. not parallel -- Out
C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994

-- Correct
D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate
-- in 1994 .. placement of the modifier is wrong here .out
E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994
-- Same as A . Also which refers to subsidies .. that create meaning error .
Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Posts: 247
Location: Poland
GMAT 1: 570 Q41 V27
WE: Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2020, 06:46
For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994

D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate

E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

Answer - B -> Correct placement of noun Senate after the modifier -> Though "which" modifying subsidies is little weird in this since "in 1994" is modifying introduced i.e. a verb and generally "which" can jump over only an essential noun modifier that can not be placed anywhere else in the sentence and not an adverbial modifier. In this sentence, in 1994 can be placed after Senate introduced, in 1994, subsidies. Best among the lot though.

Subsidies is what robbed the US citizens hence has to be closest to which

A) is not a sentence - Eliminate
C) which can not jump over a verb to modify subsidies
D) same as in C; moreover Senate is not the one who robbed
E) For protecting is not the correct way to express the intention of Senate
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 18 May 2019
Posts: 706
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2020, 13:42

For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A is not a complete sentence. There is no main clause. We have an opening modifier For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition followed by a noun subsidies, followed by a non-essential modifier introduced by Senate, and a relative clause. The subject subsidies does not have a verb.

B is incorrect because of parallelism error. Both is a parallelism marker and we expect X and Y to be parallel. X is against Indian, and Y is Chinese. X and Y are not parallel. To correct this error, against must precede both or Y must be against Chinese. We can eliminate B based on parallelism error.

In C, the non-underlined relative clause is intended to modify subsidies rather than Senate, since it is illogical to say that the Senate robbed the US citizens. In addition, subsidies are inanimate and therefore inacapable of having a purpose. For these same reasons, D can also be eliminated.

We are left with E as the best answer out of the lot. The relative clause rightly modifies subsidies.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.
Intern
Joined: 22 May 2019
Posts: 2
Concentration: Technology, Finance
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2020, 08:29
For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

A. For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies in 1994, introduced by Senate

B. To protect American textile manufacturers both against Indian and Chinese competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

C. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994

D. In order to protect American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as against Chinese, competition, subsidies in 1994 were introduced by the Senate

E. For protecting American textile manufacturers against Indian, as well as Chinese, competition, Senate introduced subsidies in 1994

A is not an independent sentence (No working verb)
B has 'against' AFTER both.
C and D don't are in passive, which renders the 'which' noun modifier away from the 'subsidies'
IMO, it should be E
Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Posts: 247
Location: Poland
GMAT 1: 570 Q41 V27
WE: Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2020, 04:05
Even though option C sounds well, here is my reasoning for it to be incorrect :-

In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

1) which is modifying "1994". "which" can not modify a clause.
2) "in 1994" is modifying Senate as if the Senate, one appointed in 1994, introduced the subsidies.
3) In order to protect should modify Senate, since he is the one who introduced in order to protect against competition.

For some points above, I see all the options as incorrect.

Please let me know if my reasoning is incorrect.

All my SC learning will go for a toss otherwise.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2966
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2020, 11:46
shameekv1989 wrote:
Even though option C sounds well, here is my reasoning for it to be incorrect :-

In order to protect American textile manufacturers against both Indian and Chinese competition, subsidies were introduced by the Senate in 1994, which robbed US citizens the opportunity of buying inexpensive and high quality clothing.

1) which is modifying "1994". "which" can not modify a clause.
2) "in 1994" is modifying Senate as if the Senate, one appointed in 1994, introduced the subsidies.
3) In order to protect should modify Senate, since he is the one who introduced in order to protect against competition.

For some points above, I see all the options as incorrect.

Please let me know if my reasoning is incorrect.

All my SC learning will go for a toss otherwise.

Hello shameekv1989,

This is in response to your PM.

I agree with your analysis. IMHO, per the GMAT SC rules, all the options are incorrect. In Choice C, which appears to be modifying the preceding action. This is ungrammatical.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________
Re: For the protection of American textile manufacturers against both Indi   [#permalink] 30 Jan 2020, 11:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by