Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
73% (01:32) correct
27%
(01:43)
wrong
based on 15652
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.
(A) sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of
(B) sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on
(C) sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of
(D) sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
(E) sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of
(A) sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of
(B) sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on
(C) sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of
(D) sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
(E) sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of
https://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/16/science/mammal-bones-found-in-amber-for-first-time.html
Fossils of the arm of a sloth, found in Puerto Rico five years ago, have been dated at 34 million years old, making it the earliest known mammal on the islands and presumably an inhabitant at the time of the hypothesized separation, Dr. MacPhee said. The age of the amber-preserved mammal, though not precise, could be further evidence of when these migrations occurred, particularly of when they might have ended.
Fossils of the arm of a sloth, found in Puerto Rico five years ago, have been dated at 34 million years old, making it the earliest known mammal on the islands and presumably an inhabitant at the time of the hypothesized separation, Dr. MacPhee said. The age of the amber-preserved mammal, though not precise, could be further evidence of when these migrations occurred, particularly of when they might have ended.
31 Oct 2017, 00:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
I’ve always had a soft spot for this question, just because it has such a wide variety of issues and errors. It also has an interesting little verb tense thing that really doesn’t matter at all: you could easily fixate on the difference between "was dated" (past tense) and "has/have been dated" (present perfect tense), but you don't have to choose between them at all. There are plenty of other issues to worry about instead.
The much smaller issue is that I see no real need for that first comma, but that’s unlikely to ever be a deciding factor on a GMAT question. But the nonsensical main clause is enough to wipe out (A).
Plus, we have a subject-verb problem: “fossils… has been dated” is spectacularly wrong. (B) is gone.
But there’s more: the phrase “that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991” seems to modify the sloth itself, and that makes no sense. Unless you think that the sloth had actually been alive for 34 million years. Maybe moving really slowly helps you live longer?
Finally, the word “this” is used as a singular pronoun, and that’s an unacceptable use of the word “this” on the GMAT. I’ve only ever seen “this” used as an article on the GMAT (“this week” or “this magnificent GMAT forum”), but never as a pronoun.
So we have lots of good reasons to eliminate (C).
And the last part of the underlined portion (“making the sloth the earliest known mammal…”) actually names the sloth instead of using a pronoun, and that adds a bit of extra clarity. It might not be strictly necessary, but it’s nice. We can keep (D).
We also have the same problem that we had in (A): “fossils… made the sloth the earliest known mammal…” That’s nonsense, too.
So we can ditch (E), and (D) is our answer.
Quote:
The “it” (which presumably refers back to the sloth) is the first thing that jumps out at me. “Fossils of the arm of a sloth… made [the sloth] the earliest known mammal…” Huh? That makes no sense. How the heck would the fossils of a sloth make the sloth the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles?
The much smaller issue is that I see no real need for that first comma, but that’s unlikely to ever be a deciding factor on a GMAT question. But the nonsensical main clause is enough to wipe out (A).
Quote:
This time, the pronoun “they” is the first thing that catches my eye. Who the heck is “they”? The fossils?
Plus, we have a subject-verb problem: “fossils… has been dated” is spectacularly wrong. (B) is gone.
Quote:
Subject-verb fail again: “fossils… was dated.” Nope.
But there’s more: the phrase “that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991” seems to modify the sloth itself, and that makes no sense. Unless you think that the sloth had actually been alive for 34 million years. Maybe moving really slowly helps you live longer?
Finally, the word “this” is used as a singular pronoun, and that’s an unacceptable use of the word “this” on the GMAT. I’ve only ever seen “this” used as an article on the GMAT (“this week” or “this magnificent GMAT forum”), but never as a pronoun.
So we have lots of good reasons to eliminate (C).
Quote:
This one looks pretty good. The subject-verb agreement works: “fossils… have been dated at 34 million years old…” Cool. The modifier “found in Puerto Rico in 1991” is nicely set apart with commas, so it seems to refer to the entire phrase “fossils of the arm of a sloth”, and not just the sloth itself, as we saw in (C).
And the last part of the underlined portion (“making the sloth the earliest known mammal…”) actually names the sloth instead of using a pronoun, and that adds a bit of extra clarity. It might not be strictly necessary, but it’s nice. We can keep (D).
Quote:
Thanks to the modifier “which”, which typically modifies the immediately preceding noun, it really sounds like the sloth itself was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and that makes no sense. (I also can’t make much sense of the comma placement in that part of the sentence, but again, comma placement isn’t really a major emphasis on GMAT SC.)
We also have the same problem that we had in (A): “fossils… made the sloth the earliest known mammal…” That’s nonsense, too.
So we can ditch (E), and (D) is our answer.
27 Jan 2019, 16:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello Everyone!
Let's take a look at this question, one issue at a time, and narrow it down to the correct choice! To begin, here's the original question with the major differences between the options highlighted in orange:
Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.
A. sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of
B. sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on
C. sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of
D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of
After a quick glance over the options, a few key differences jump out:
1. Comma placement and verb choice after "sloth" (essential vs. non-essential clauses)
2. dated / has been dated / was dated / have been dated (verb tense)
3. made it / making it / making this / making the sloth / made the sloth (verb tense & pronouns)
4. of / on / known on (idioms)
Let's start with #1 on our list, which is to focus on how each sentence handles essential and non-essential clauses. Whenever we see a phrase in the middle of a sentence that's between two commas, it's supposed to be a non-essential clause.
This means that if we removed the phrase, the sentence would remain a complete sentence and wouldn't lose its intended meaning. A quick way to check this is to cross out any non-essential clauses you can find, and read what's left over. If it still makes sense, keep it for later. If it becomes a sentence fragment, or the meaning is totally changed, eliminate it. To make this easier, I've added in the non-underlined portions of the sentence:
A. Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991,and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.
This is INCORRECT because the meaning of the sentence is altered by taking out the phrase "and dated at 34 million years old." By removing that phrase, we're simply saying that the presence of sloth fossils found in 1991 is enough proof that they are the earliest known mammals on the islands. But how do we know that? Because they were dated at 34 million years old. If we remove that bit of information, what's left over is vague and confusing for readers.
B. Fossils of the arm of a sloth,that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on the Greater Antilles islands.
This is INCORRECT because when we eliminate the non-essential clause, we can clearly see that there is a subject-verb agreement problem. This sentence uses the singular "has been dated" with the plural "Fossils," so let's rule this one out.
C. Fossils of the arm of a sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991,was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.
This is INCORRECT because, if we read the sentence with the non-essential phrase crossed out, it doesn't make sense. It's actually missing a verb! Therefore, let's eliminate this option.
D. Fossils of the arm of a sloth,found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on the Greater Antilles islands. --> OKAY
E. Fossils of the arm of a sloth which,found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands. --> OKAY
We can eliminate options A, B, & C because they have problems when dealing with non-essential clauses.
Now that we've narrowed it down to 2 options, let's take a closer look at what we have left:
D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
This is CORRECT! The non-essential phrase, "found in Puerto Rico in 1991" truly is a non-essential piece of information. The important points (fossils were found, they were dated at 34 million years old, we now know they were the earliest mammals from the island) are all there and punctuated correctly. The sentence also uses the correct verb tense "have been dated" to show that the fossils were dated after they were found, but before the present, which is what we're looking for. It also correctly uses "making" to turn the last clause into an -ing modifier that refers back to the previous phrase, which is what we're looking for.
E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of
This is INCORRECT for one main reason - it contains two competing verbs! It correctly uses commas to make the phrase "found in Puerto Rico in 1991" a non-essential clause. However, it has two verb phrases (was dated at 34 millions years old / made the sloth the earliest known mammal...) without anything to connect them together. The last phrase should start with "making" to change it to a modifier that shows cause and effect. The fossils were dated at 34 million years old, and that led to them being known as the oldest mammals on the islands. Without the -ing modifier, it's unclear what actions led to what results.
There you have it - option D is the correct choice! This is an incredibly complex question, but if you can focus on the differences between the options, you can narrow down your options to only a couple you can focus on in more detail.
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Let's take a look at this question, one issue at a time, and narrow it down to the correct choice! To begin, here's the original question with the major differences between the options highlighted in orange:
Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.
A. sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of
B. sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on
C. sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of
D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of
After a quick glance over the options, a few key differences jump out:
1. Comma placement and verb choice after "sloth" (essential vs. non-essential clauses)
2. dated / has been dated / was dated / have been dated (verb tense)
3. made it / making it / making this / making the sloth / made the sloth (verb tense & pronouns)
4. of / on / known on (idioms)
Let's start with #1 on our list, which is to focus on how each sentence handles essential and non-essential clauses. Whenever we see a phrase in the middle of a sentence that's between two commas, it's supposed to be a non-essential clause.
This means that if we removed the phrase, the sentence would remain a complete sentence and wouldn't lose its intended meaning. A quick way to check this is to cross out any non-essential clauses you can find, and read what's left over. If it still makes sense, keep it for later. If it becomes a sentence fragment, or the meaning is totally changed, eliminate it. To make this easier, I've added in the non-underlined portions of the sentence:
A. Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991,
This is INCORRECT because the meaning of the sentence is altered by taking out the phrase "and dated at 34 million years old." By removing that phrase, we're simply saying that the presence of sloth fossils found in 1991 is enough proof that they are the earliest known mammals on the islands. But how do we know that? Because they were dated at 34 million years old. If we remove that bit of information, what's left over is vague and confusing for readers.
B. Fossils of the arm of a sloth,
This is INCORRECT because when we eliminate the non-essential clause, we can clearly see that there is a subject-verb agreement problem. This sentence uses the singular "has been dated" with the plural "Fossils," so let's rule this one out.
C. Fossils of the arm of a sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991,
This is INCORRECT because, if we read the sentence with the non-essential phrase crossed out, it doesn't make sense. It's actually missing a verb! Therefore, let's eliminate this option.
D. Fossils of the arm of a sloth,
E. Fossils of the arm of a sloth which,
We can eliminate options A, B, & C because they have problems when dealing with non-essential clauses.
Now that we've narrowed it down to 2 options, let's take a closer look at what we have left:
D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
This is CORRECT! The non-essential phrase, "found in Puerto Rico in 1991" truly is a non-essential piece of information. The important points (fossils were found, they were dated at 34 million years old, we now know they were the earliest mammals from the island) are all there and punctuated correctly. The sentence also uses the correct verb tense "have been dated" to show that the fossils were dated after they were found, but before the present, which is what we're looking for. It also correctly uses "making" to turn the last clause into an -ing modifier that refers back to the previous phrase, which is what we're looking for.
E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of
This is INCORRECT for one main reason - it contains two competing verbs! It correctly uses commas to make the phrase "found in Puerto Rico in 1991" a non-essential clause. However, it has two verb phrases (was dated at 34 millions years old / made the sloth the earliest known mammal...) without anything to connect them together. The last phrase should start with "making" to change it to a modifier that shows cause and effect. The fossils were dated at 34 million years old, and that led to them being known as the oldest mammals on the islands. Without the -ing modifier, it's unclear what actions led to what results.
There you have it - option D is the correct choice! This is an incredibly complex question, but if you can focus on the differences between the options, you can narrow down your options to only a couple you can focus on in more detail.
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
