Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Originally posted by mniyer on 19 Apr 2011, 19:14.
Last edited by mniyer on 20 Apr 2011, 19:57, edited 2 times in total.
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm confronted with the silliest questions in my mind regarding fractions raised to exponents. Can any one please confirm if my understanding is correct?
a) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be smaller Eg. (-1/2)^(1/2) [I'm thinking the result will be an imaginary number but at the same time compelled to see this as -(1/2)^(1/2). Same for (c), (d) and (e)] b) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be bigger c) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be smaller d) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be smaller e) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be bigger f) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be smaller
And the ones which are apparent... g) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be bigger Eg. (1/2)^(1/2) h) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be bigger
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I'm confronted with the most silliest questions in my mind regarding fractions raised to exponents. Can any one please confirm if my understanding is correct?
a) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be smaller Eg. (-1/2)^(1/2) [I'm thinking the result will be an imaginary number but at the same time compelled to see this as -(1/2)^(1/2). Same for (c), (d) and (e)] b) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be bigger c) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be smaller d) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be smaller e) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be bigger f) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be smaller
And the ones which are apparent... g) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be bigger Eg. (1/2)^(1/2) h) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be bigger
Show more
These are certainly worthwhile questions to think about, since many GMAT inequality questions test your understanding of exponents. That said, some of your questions don't have an answer, because often the result will be undefined. In particular, raising negative numbers to fractional exponents often produces a result which is undefined (-2)^(1/2) is the square root of a negative number, for example, so doesn't make sense); you won't encounter this kind of situation on the GMAT.
I highlighted in red above something you will want to be careful about. If you see, for example, (-3)^2, that is not equal to -(3^2) - you can't take the negative sign out; in the same way, the simplification you've attempted above is not correct.
Of your questions above, the ones that are frequently important on the GMAT are b), f), g) and h). When your base is negative, then you will almost always only be concerned about understanding what will happen when your exponent is an integer. It then becomes important whether that exponent is even or odd.
If you have a negative base and some kind of fractional exponent - and offhand I don't know that I've seen an official question with that combination - that exponent will need an odd denominator, so if you want to think through what might happen in those cases, you should imagine what will happen if your exponent is 1/3 or -1/3.
I'm confronted with the most silliest questions in my mind regarding fractions raised to exponents. Can any one please confirm if my understanding is correct?
a) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be smaller Eg. (-1/2)^(1/2) [I'm thinking the result will be an imaginary number but at the same time compelled to see this as -(1/2)^(1/2). Same for (c), (d) and (e)] b) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be bigger c) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be smaller d) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be smaller e) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be bigger f) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be smaller
And the ones which are apparent... g) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be bigger Eg. (1/2)^(1/2) h) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be bigger
These are certainly worthwhile questions to think about, since many GMAT inequality questions test your understanding of exponents. That said, some of your questions don't have an answer, because often the result will be undefined. In particular, raising negative numbers to fractional exponents often produces a result which is undefined (-2)^(1/2) is the square root of a negative number, for example, so doesn't make sense); you won't encounter this kind of situation on the GMAT.
I highlighted in red above something you will want to be careful about. If you see, for example, (-3)^2, that is not equal to -(3^2) - you can't take the negative sign out; in the same way, the simplification you've attempted above is not correct.
Of your questions above, the ones that are frequently important on the GMAT are b), f), g) and h). When your base is negative, then you will almost always only be concerned about understanding what will happen when your exponent is an integer. It then becomes important whether that exponent is even or odd.
If you have a negative base and some kind of fractional exponent - and offhand I don't know that I've seen an official question with that combination - that exponent will need an odd denominator, so if you want to think through what might happen in those cases, you should imagine what will happen if your exponent is 1/3 or -1/3.
I'm confronted with the silliest questions in my mind regarding fractions raised to exponents. Can any one please confirm if my understanding is correct?
a) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be smaller Eg. (-1/2)^(1/2) [I'm thinking the result will be an imaginary number but at the same time compelled to see this as -(1/2)^(1/2). Same for (c), (d) and (e)]
Show more
(a) will be an imaginary, not real, number
mniyer
b) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be bigger
Show more
the result of (b) will be a bigger number
mniyer
c) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be smaller
Show more
(c) will be an imaginary, not real, number
mniyer
d) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be smaller
Show more
(d) will be an imaginary, not real, number
mniyer
e) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be bigger
Show more
(e) will be an imaginary, not real, number
mniyer
f) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be smaller
Show more
the result of (f) will be a smaller number
mniyer
And the ones which are apparent... g) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be bigger Eg. (1/2)^(1/2)
Show more
the result of (g) will be a bigger number
mniyer
h) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be bigger
b) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be bigger.
I feel that the result in this case should be smaller, not bigger.
Here,x is a proper fraction since 0<x<1 we can write x^-n as 1/x^n where n lies between 0 and 1
Let us consider the Dr: x = proper fraction; n = proper fraction. Any positive proper fraction raised to the power between 0 and 1 will result in a number larger than the original fraction.
Hence, if the Dr. increases, the result as a whole should decrease.
I have a doubt... So, (-ve number) ^ non-integral exponent = imaginary and CANNOT be plotted on the no. line?(Basically, should I be worried about finding a soln.?)
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.