Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 03:38 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 03:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mniyer
Joined: 06 Apr 2011
Last visit: 14 Aug 2014
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
203
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 24
Kudos: 203
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmat1220
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 17 Feb 2020
Posts: 461
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Products:
Posts: 461
Kudos: 1,015
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
11,271
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,271
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mniyer
Joined: 06 Apr 2011
Last visit: 14 Aug 2014
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmat1220
b c d e f are correct inferences

a is to be taken with a pinch of salt. the number can be imaginary rendering a useless conclusion.

Posted from my mobile device

How come 'c' is correct as this one will be a root of negative too?
User avatar
mniyer
Joined: 06 Apr 2011
Last visit: 14 Aug 2014
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
mniyer
I'm confronted with the most silliest questions in my mind regarding fractions raised to exponents. Can any one please confirm if my understanding is correct?

a) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be smaller Eg. (-1/2)^(1/2)
[I'm thinking the result will be an imaginary number but at the same time compelled to see this as -(1/2)^(1/2). Same for (c), (d) and (e)]
b) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be bigger
c) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be smaller
d) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be smaller
e) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be bigger
f) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be smaller

And the ones which are apparent...
g) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be bigger Eg. (1/2)^(1/2)
h) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be bigger

These are certainly worthwhile questions to think about, since many GMAT inequality questions test your understanding of exponents. That said, some of your questions don't have an answer, because often the result will be undefined. In particular, raising negative numbers to fractional exponents often produces a result which is undefined (-2)^(1/2) is the square root of a negative number, for example, so doesn't make sense); you won't encounter this kind of situation on the GMAT.

I highlighted in red above something you will want to be careful about. If you see, for example, (-3)^2, that is not equal to -(3^2) - you can't take the negative sign out; in the same way, the simplification you've attempted above is not correct.

Of your questions above, the ones that are frequently important on the GMAT are b), f), g) and h). When your base is negative, then you will almost always only be concerned about understanding what will happen when your exponent is an integer. It then becomes important whether that exponent is even or odd.

If you have a negative base and some kind of fractional exponent - and offhand I don't know that I've seen an official question with that combination - that exponent will need an odd denominator, so if you want to think through what might happen in those cases, you should imagine what will happen if your exponent is 1/3 or -1/3.

Thanks much for a detailed explanation!
User avatar
Schawjibb
Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Last visit: 05 Sep 2021
Posts: 182
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 136
Status:Preparing myself to break the sound( 700 )-barrier!
Affiliations: IFC - Business Edge, Bangladesh Enterprise Institute
Posts: 182
Kudos: 243
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mniyer
I'm confronted with the silliest questions in my mind regarding fractions raised to exponents. Can any one please confirm if my understanding is correct?

a) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be smaller Eg. (-1/2)^(1/2)
[I'm thinking the result will be an imaginary number but at the same time compelled to see this as -(1/2)^(1/2). Same for (c), (d) and (e)]
(a) will be an imaginary, not real, number

mniyer
b) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be bigger
the result of (b) will be a bigger number

mniyer
c) The result of a fraction between 0 to -1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be smaller
(c) will be an imaginary, not real, number

mniyer
d) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be smaller
(d) will be an imaginary, not real, number

mniyer
e) The result of a fraction between -1 to -2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be bigger
(e) will be an imaginary, not real, number

mniyer
f) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between -1 to -2 will be smaller
the result of (f) will be a smaller number

mniyer
And the ones which are apparent...
g) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to 1 will be bigger Eg. (1/2)^(1/2)
the result of (g) will be a bigger number

mniyer
h) The result of a fraction between 1 to 2 raised to an exponent between 1 to 2 will be bigger
the result of (h) will be a bigger number
User avatar
nikhilsamuel89
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Last visit: 30 Sep 2021
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Location: France
Posts: 36
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
b) The result of a fraction between 0 to 1 raised to an exponent between 0 to -1 will be bigger.

I feel that the result in this case should be smaller, not bigger.

Here,x is a proper fraction since 0<x<1
we can write x^-n as 1/x^n where n lies between 0 and 1

Let us consider the Dr:
x = proper fraction; n = proper fraction.
Any positive proper fraction raised to the power between 0 and 1 will result in a number larger than the original fraction.

Hence, if the Dr. increases, the result as a whole should decrease.
User avatar
nikhilsamuel89
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Last visit: 30 Sep 2021
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Location: France
Posts: 36
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a doubt...
So, (-ve number) ^ non-integral exponent = imaginary and CANNOT be plotted on the no. line?(Basically, should I be worried about finding a soln.?)



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!