It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 12:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 284

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 44

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT Date: 08-27-2012
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2010, 00:13
suesie970 wrote:
321kumarsushant wrote:
can anyone please explain why C is not a correct option??
i am agree with C.
E doesn't make sense to me.
can any one tell me, where can i find the correct solution of this question apart from this discussion.?

321kumarsushant:
Option C says that when Frobisher examined the soil sample for gold he used a different method than anyone else was using back in the 1500s . Even if this is true, this statement does not affect the conclusion at all.
If choice C said "The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the twenty first century.", then it would be a contender for the correct answer.
Hope that helps.

hey Suesie,
now i am agree with E.
_________________

kudos me if you like my post.

Attitude determine everything.
all the best and God bless you.

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 44

Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 84

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 6

Location: India

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2010, 08:01
E.

Gold content in two studies can be different if one of the samples had been adulterated with gold while it was being shipped from the island to the lab where it was examined. This argument relies on properly identifying the conclusion (and premises) . Conclusion is that F's method were wrong. Only assumption mentioned in E, if negated, can defy the conclusion

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2010
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 33

Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.59
WE: Corporate Finance (Entertainment and Sports)

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2010, 15:59
+1 E

fiesta wrote:
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there. Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.
(B) The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island.
(C) The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by
Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
(D) Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.
(E) Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 33

Intern
Joined: 01 Dec 2010
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 15:25
Frobisher could have mistakely examined for gold on any other island as well too. In that case D would be a choice. Please explain why this option is out.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

Location: Stockholm, Sweden

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 15:46
chelliyil wrote:
Frobisher could have mistakely examined for gold on any other island as well too. In that case D would be a choice. Please explain why this option is out.

You cannot assume information that isn't stated in the question. With the given information, she/he/whoever draws the conclusion that the method was innaccurate.

There are many things that could have happened but only the things mentioned in the text are valid for the argument
_________________

12/2010 GMATPrep 1 620 (Q34/V41)
01/2011 GMATPrep 2 640 (Q42/V36)
01/2011 GMATPrep 3 700 (Q47/V39)
02/2011 GMATPrep 4 710 (Q48/V39)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 1 650 (Q46/V32)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 2 680 (Q46/V36)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 3 710 (Q45/V41)

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7677

Kudos [?]: 17405 [1], given: 232

Location: Pune, India

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 19:05
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
chelliyil wrote:
Frobisher could have mistakely examined for gold on any other island as well too. In that case D would be a choice. Please explain why this option is out.

The argument says that he got soil from Kodlunarn island examined. The Queen sent two expeditions there. The argument does not have anything to do with the other islands. It does not assume that he did not get soil of any other island examined. Perhaps he did and found no gold there or perhaps he did find gold there. We do not know and do not care as far as this argument goes. Here we are only concerned with Kodlunarn.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17405 [1], given: 232

Manager
Status: I am Midnight's Child !
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 11

WE 1: Software Design and Development

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2010, 13:06
fiesta wrote:
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there. Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.
(B) The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island.
(C) The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by
Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
(D) Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.
(E) Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.

Clearly E.
_________________

Argument : If you love long trips, you love the GMAT.
Conclusion : GMAT is long journey.

What does the author assume ?
Assumption : A long journey is a long trip.

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 11

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 252

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 27

Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2011, 09:22
suesie970 wrote:
321kumarsushant wrote:
can anyone please explain why C is not a correct option??
i am agree with C.
E doesn't make sense to me.
can any one tell me, where can i find the correct solution of this question apart from this discussion.?

321kumarsushant:
Option C says that when Frobisher examined the soil sample for gold he used a different method than anyone else was using back in the 1500s . Even if this is true, this statement does not affect the conclusion at all.
If choice C said "The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the twenty first century.", then it would be a contender for the correct answer.
Hope that helps.

E clearly. It's the only one that strays from the original line of the passage.

Susie,

That amendment to option C was a good addition.
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 27

Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 939 [1], given: 15

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2011, 02:25
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported,Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there.
Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.

Can anyone help in explaining the answer with some good logic?

Kudos [?]: 939 [1], given: 15

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 215 [1], given: 13

Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2011, 05:10
1
KUDOS
Here the conclusion of the agument is that the methods used were wrong
A. since no timelines of Elizabeth's expeditions are given, and in fact it is implied that these were done after Frobisher's exploration - since they were done because of his report only- and since these also didnt find any gold, despite being done in 16th century, Statement A is wrong
B.Weak option - anyway which part of island does modern analysis base itself on - same or not? Since we dont know this, we cant say this is assumption on which the author's argument is based.
C. If methods were different, it doesnt mean they were wrong/ not wrong. incorrect
D. Othe islands are not being talked of here. Incorrect option
E. If frobisher added this gold himself, then both conditions are satisfied- the methods are correct and the soill doesnt have actually any gold. this argument is therefore based on this assumption.

Kudos [?]: 215 [1], given: 13

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 871

Kudos [?]: 396 [0], given: 123

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2011, 11:08
Nicely explained ! Especially the option B.

Kudos [?]: 396 [0], given: 123

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 257

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2011, 16:18
E

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2011, 03:20
+1 for E

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1633

Kudos [?]: 1107 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2011, 09:45
+1 E
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1107 [0], given: 109

Manager
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 21

Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2011, 07:13
vot'E' for E
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 21

Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2011, 11:39
+1 for E..

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 172

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2011, 23:03
IMO ans should be E

For C, we donot have sufficient information to assume whether the method used was different or not, but the use of "modern analysis" indicates that the present day test would be more accurate

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2011, 11:13
E

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2011
Posts: 26

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2011, 12:36
E

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 127

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 00:32
+1 E

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 12

Re: Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from   [#permalink] 02 Dec 2011, 00:32

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 72 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by