Hoozan
Bunuel A right-angled triangle has a maximum area when the triangle is isosceles. Similarly, An isosceles triangle has a maximum area when it is a right-angled triangle. So from (1) we have AB = 6. Let's assume BE = AB = 6 (Making it an isosceles triangle). Thus the are would be 1/2 x 6 x 6 = 18 < 25. Why is this thought process incorrect
Hi Hoozan,
In this particular DS question, there are a couple of things that should stand-out:
First, since we're dealing with a DS question, the picture is not necessarily drawn 'to scale' (meaning that side AB of the rectangle might be considerably shorter OR longer than side BC (and by extension, segment BE). Second, with the information in Fact 1, we only have one of the two legs of a right triangle, so we have no way of determining its exact area (nor how big that area can become). As segment BE gets smaller, the area of the triangle becomes smaller - and as BE gets bigger, the area of the triangle becomes bigger.
With the information in Fact 1, while it's certainly possible that triangle ABE is an isosceles, right triangle (with an area of 18), we have NO proof that that is actually the case. Again, as BE gets bigger, the area would increase above 18).
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com