Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 18:20 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 18:20 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT
Sep 0712:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0401:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
16 Jul 2026, 00:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
I got E as the answer because the number of factors the participant considered shows us that their could be alternative explanations to why group A was more to choose the familiar product.
On A, the study already addresses that one product is familiar and the other isn't so advertising is irrelevant when that is already controlled.
For B, the participant enjoyment of activities related to the product could impact the choice, but it doesn't affect whether or not the participants choices were driven by stress.
In C, the researchers' framing of importance might have made the participants more stressed, but we don't know that and it isn't a logical conclusion to the passage. Also even if it did, if the same statement was made to both groups it wouldn't explain a variance between the two.
D is irrelevant sense we were told that the stress levels of the group were equal.
On A, the study already addresses that one product is familiar and the other isn't so advertising is irrelevant when that is already controlled.
For B, the participant enjoyment of activities related to the product could impact the choice, but it doesn't affect whether or not the participants choices were driven by stress.
In C, the researchers' framing of importance might have made the participants more stressed, but we don't know that and it isn't a logical conclusion to the passage. Also even if it did, if the same statement was made to both groups it wouldn't explain a variance between the two.
D is irrelevant sense we were told that the stress levels of the group were equal.
16 Jul 2026, 02:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
I went with E here. Here's my breakdown:
The stem tells us that there are 2 groups and 2 products (familiar and unfamiliar). The researchers rushed one group and and did not rush the other. Group that was rushed all went with the familiar product, whereas only 2/3 people in group 2 went for the familiar one. Thus, scientists concluded that the stress caused by rushing was counteracted by the familiarity of the product, for group 1.
How I see this conclusion is that due to a constrained time period to choose, group 1 people went with the familiar product, whereas since group 2 people had time, some of them still chose the unfamiliar one after thinking (since they had the time to think). This has to reflect in the answer choices, as the correct answer would explain this conclusion better.
Option A: Any difference in the frequency or geographic span of the advertising of the product, should have directly affected the familiarity/unfamiliarity of the product. Since it is already given to us that one of the products was familiar and the other one was not, this information will not help us at all. Besides, it does not help us define any relationship between the time taken to make a choice and the familiarity of the product. So we can eliminate this.
Option B: How much a particular group's participant valued the product should not have affected their decision making from a time standpoint. Besides, the only explicit information that we are given about the participants and products, states that the difference in products is on familiarity and the difference in participant groups is the time that was given to them to make a choice. Thus, it would be over-reaching I feel, to be taking this option into account. Hence, Eliminate.
Option C: Again, in this option, what we are explicitly given about the nature of the experiment is that the difference in conditions for both groups lies just in the time given to them to make a choice. It cannot be assumed that the instructions given to both groups were different. Hence, eliminate this.
Option D: The passage exactly tells us that the amount of stress outside the experiment is equal for all participants. The nature of the stress should be immaterial, since the experiment is only evaluating the amount of stress. We can eliminate this.
Option E: This actually helps us establish some relation between the time taken to choose by participants and the nature of the product. Every choice goes through a certain evaluation process for every individual on the basis of a list of parameters. Now if this list was long, every individual would need more time. Since group 1 participants had less time, they could not evaluate the choices on all parameters, they would have to go for a familiar option only. Thus, this explains the conclusion as to why for group 1, the familiarity counteracts the time pressure. Hence, I chose this.
The stem tells us that there are 2 groups and 2 products (familiar and unfamiliar). The researchers rushed one group and and did not rush the other. Group that was rushed all went with the familiar product, whereas only 2/3 people in group 2 went for the familiar one. Thus, scientists concluded that the stress caused by rushing was counteracted by the familiarity of the product, for group 1.
How I see this conclusion is that due to a constrained time period to choose, group 1 people went with the familiar product, whereas since group 2 people had time, some of them still chose the unfamiliar one after thinking (since they had the time to think). This has to reflect in the answer choices, as the correct answer would explain this conclusion better.
Option A: Any difference in the frequency or geographic span of the advertising of the product, should have directly affected the familiarity/unfamiliarity of the product. Since it is already given to us that one of the products was familiar and the other one was not, this information will not help us at all. Besides, it does not help us define any relationship between the time taken to make a choice and the familiarity of the product. So we can eliminate this.
Option B: How much a particular group's participant valued the product should not have affected their decision making from a time standpoint. Besides, the only explicit information that we are given about the participants and products, states that the difference in products is on familiarity and the difference in participant groups is the time that was given to them to make a choice. Thus, it would be over-reaching I feel, to be taking this option into account. Hence, Eliminate.
Option C: Again, in this option, what we are explicitly given about the nature of the experiment is that the difference in conditions for both groups lies just in the time given to them to make a choice. It cannot be assumed that the instructions given to both groups were different. Hence, eliminate this.
Option D: The passage exactly tells us that the amount of stress outside the experiment is equal for all participants. The nature of the stress should be immaterial, since the experiment is only evaluating the amount of stress. We can eliminate this.
Option E: This actually helps us establish some relation between the time taken to choose by participants and the nature of the product. Every choice goes through a certain evaluation process for every individual on the basis of a list of parameters. Now if this list was long, every individual would need more time. Since group 1 participants had less time, they could not evaluate the choices on all parameters, they would have to go for a familiar option only. Thus, this explains the conclusion as to why for group 1, the familiarity counteracts the time pressure. Hence, I chose this.
16 Jul 2026, 02:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
E, by POE.
No other options seem relevant.
No other options seem relevant.
16 Jul 2026, 02:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
The researchers think the rushed group picked the familiar brand because it helped counter the extra stress
A doesn't matter. Any difference in advertising would affect both groups, not just the rushed one. Eliminate
B is irrelevant. Liking the product doesn't explain the difference between the 2 groups. Eliminate
C doesn't really matter. The importance of the product wasn't what changed b/w the groups. Eliminate
D is tempting, but both groups reported similar stress levels. The source of that stress isn't the issue here. Eliminate
E sounds good imo. If judging the unfamiliar brand requires thinking through more factors, the rushed group may have just picked the familiar brand to save time. That gives us another explanation of the results. Keep
Ans : E
A doesn't matter. Any difference in advertising would affect both groups, not just the rushed one. Eliminate
B is irrelevant. Liking the product doesn't explain the difference between the 2 groups. Eliminate
C doesn't really matter. The importance of the product wasn't what changed b/w the groups. Eliminate
D is tempting, but both groups reported similar stress levels. The source of that stress isn't the issue here. Eliminate
E sounds good imo. If judging the unfamiliar brand requires thinking through more factors, the rushed group may have just picked the familiar brand to save time. That gives us another explanation of the results. Keep
Ans : E
