BatrickPatemann
I just wrapped up another optional non-official quant exam from the
GMAT Club tests and, once again, landed on a discouraging 79Q. This has been the story since Week 3—I've done several of these tests and can’t seem to push past 80.
Now I’m wondering: should I be worried at this stage? Should my score already be higher? Part of me is thinking about hitting pause on my current study plan and maybe switching gears, I've heard pretty wild things about
TTP for people struggling with quant. All this before I dive into the official material lined up for the next few weeks.
I ask this since question difficulty has gone up just recently (this week we are still doing some medium difficulty OG questions and sub555 sets, so maybe I haven't seen any improvement just yet because I happened to have this 79Q level before and will improve surely after this last weeks work?
What really throws me off is the inconsistency: I can hit 90th percentile on topics like sets and statistics, but then drop to the 20th percentile on others. I’ve tried fixing this by practicing more problem sets and digging through forum discussions these past couple of weeks, but the needle hasn’t moved much.
So... is this normal, or is it a red flag? Thanks in advance
GMATNinjaSorry to hear that you haven't been thrilled with your results,
BatrickPatemann!
The biggest thing that jumps out at me: I wouldn't panic based on the results of a
non-official quant test just yet. It's incredibly difficult for creators of non-official tests to mimic the actual exam's style and scoring -- so don't take that number too literally. That's why the interpretation guidance emphasizes your time management (anything over 3 minutes on quant is a problem, since that time is probably better spent elsewhere) and any "unforced" errors.
So as you look at the GMAT Club (or any other non-official test), ask yourself: are you missing questions that should be fairly easy for you? If so, that's where you need to focus your attention. On an adaptive test like the GMAT, one or two boneheaded errors can cause a huge drop in your score -- and if you think you should be above 80, a sloppy mistake or two might be the entire difference.
When you say that you're at the 90th percentile in some topics but the 20th in others, are you basing that on data from the practice exams? If so, I would be very careful with that data, particularly from non-official exams. Even if you're taking official tests, those topic-based metrics are calculated based on a very small sample of questions -- and it may or may not be picking up on something that's important. It's very possible that the inconsistency is just a reflection of sloppy mistakes -- again, one of two of those will tank your topic subscores in a hurry.
That said, if you really have major imbalances in your skills, you'll want to address them ASAP. If your skills are really at the 20th percentile in some topic areas, that's a disaster on the GMAT, because you risk missing some very easy questions -- and those always do more damage than missing harder ones.
Tl;dr: don't worry too much about those numbers, but if you're making careless errors (and/or mismanaging your time), address that problem ASAP. If the subscores really do reflect major imbalances in your skills -- particularly if those imbalances mimic your performance on the homework -- then you'll want to spend extra time on your weak areas before you go too much farther. But it's very possible that your
performance is inconsistent -- not your skills, exactly.
I hope that helps a bit, and have fun studying!