BatrickPatemann
Hi
GMATNinja, another week another grind.
As I read the “Interpret the Results” section, I’m surprised by the constraint of needing to be within 5 points of my score goals. I’d be really happy to add those 4–5 points in the remaining weeks, although that might be too optimistic.
Also, I feel like I should be able to jump from successfully completing mid-easy questions (<2 min) directly to mid-difficulty ones (<2 min). After revisiting previous weeks, most of the work was on sub-555 questions (maybe there were some mid-high difficulty questions via mixed sets, which I interpreted as optional vs. the dedicated sub-555 set). So how can I be expected to score high if most of the volume is around easy questions?
I feel a little left out when I read that I’m supposed to be within 5 points of my goal scores or else pause the strategy given I haven’t improved much from the beginning (already scoring 78s in Quant).
- Are high scores built from practicing easy/mid-easy questions only?
- Would I be wasting my time (and sanity) if I focused on doing lots of sets of 605–705 questions? About the same volume we did for sub-555.
- What would you recommend for addressing such a problem?
Thanks!
Broadly speaking,
bb is spot-on here. If you're missing easier questions, there's no real point in moving forward with harder ones -- tougher questions are irrelevant unless you're doing well on easier ones.
So here's the big question: why do you think your scores are stuck in the high 70s? Is it because you're missing questions that you know how to answer correctly? If so, that's where you'll want to focus your energy. I think you've seen me write this before, but the difference between a 78 and a low-80s score might be just one or two errors on easier questions.
If, on the other hand, you're reliably nailing easier questions, that's a different story. Maybe you should be practicing harder questions -- and that's why we give you the option of mixed difficulty questions starting early in the study plan. If you're doing well on the easy ones, you'll want to graduate to mixed sets fairly quickly.
Put another way: obviously, the study plan can't diagnose your problems, but the idea is that there's plenty of flexibility built into it, as long as you can recognize your own problems (perhaps with help from the long-winded "interpreting your results" section each week). Stick with the easy questions if those are the issue; move on to harder questions if they aren't.
The tough thing is that five points might not sound like much, but it's quite a bit on this version of the GMAT. It's HARD to get an 83 on quant, and two things are true at the same time:
- A couple of careless mistakes can easily knock an 83-level scorer down to a 78.
- If your skills are really at a 78 level, it can be a long journey to an 83 on quant.
Again, I don't know whether your issue is execution (careless mistakes, for example) or skill (your quant foundations are shaky in some way, and you struggle on mid-level questions at times) -- or a mix of the two. If it's more about execution, you need to fix those problems ASAP, and nothing else really matters much until you do. If skill is the problem, that's fixable -- but might take some time. From your posts, I have the vague impression that this is more of a story about execution -- but I obviously don't know for sure, and that's something you'll have to figure out before you move forward.
I hope that helps a bit!