How to Interpret Your Week 10 Homework Results
Please read this section if you’re serious about optimizing your study time. If you’re not thrilled with your practice test scores yet, then you’ll definitely want to read this post – maybe it’s time to pause the study plan if you need to?
As always, if you’re worried about something that isn’t addressed here, please post your questions/worries/doubts either here or in the
Week 1 thread.
How to interpret your results on mba.com test #3
This should look familiar, but we’ll keep tweaking the benchmarks as you approach test day:
- How far are you from your target score overall? In theory, you’re about 3 weeks from your actual exam, so you should be really, really close to your goal. As a very very rough guideline, I’m worried if you still need to gain more than 20-40 points – but it depends on what, exactly, went wrong.
- Omitted questions can DESTROY your GMAT score. The current version of the GMAT penalizes you severely for omitted questions, so please answer absolutely everything, even if you’re guessing blindly at the end of a section.
- Remember that in the GMAT scoring system, 3 = 20. If you gain 3 “section points” – on any individual section or combination of sections – your total GMAT score will increase by 20 points. More on that in this short video, or here’s a nifty score calculator.
- How far are you from your target score on the quant, verbal, and DI sections? If you’re 5+ points away from your target score on any individual section, you’re at risk of running out of time, and you might want to pause the study plan to work on your underlying skills. Just keep in mind that DI scores are 3-5 points lower than verbal and quant scores, on average – so set your score targets accordingly.
- How many careless errors did you make on quant and DI? If you made more than one silly error on quant or DI, then your main problem might be sloppiness – not necessarily a lack of skill. Even a small handful of silly mistakes can cost you 5+ points on a single section. So if this is a problem, fix it NOW.
- Do you notice any patterns in your quant errors? Are you disproportionately missing word translation questions? Annoying algebraic questions with very few words in them? Something else? One or two errors might mean nothing – for example, if you missed two hard, weird rate/work questions (but usually nail the easy ones), that’s cool, and you don’t have anything to worry about. But if you’re missing the same sort of thing repeatedly – especially if the questions seem to be on the easier side – then you’ll want to consider pausing the study plan to focus on your weaknesses.
- Count the number of errors you made on each verbal question type. If you see a dramatic imbalance, then you know exactly what to focus on. If your verbal errors are relatively balanced between CR and RC, the underlying weaknesses might take more time to fix.
- Do you notice any patterns in your DI errors? Are you disproportionately missing verbal-based DI questions? Getting freaked out by the mountain of information on MSR questions? Paralyzing when you see particularly weird graphs? Or do you see some other pattern? To be fair, DI is so multifaceted that it can be hard to spot patterns in your mistakes, but if you’re unhappy with your DI score, try to look beyond the question type, and figure out if anything tends to trigger most of your mistakes.
- Look for signs of stubbornness. If you’re spending more than 3 minutes on individual questions, you’ll need to learn to let go. Time is a scarce resource on the GMAT, and spending 3+ minutes isn’t efficient (other than on the first question of an RC passage or a Multi-Source Reasoning set).
- Is nervousness a factor? Is your mind going blank under the pressure of a practice test? Are you struggling to sleep the night before a practice test? If so, check out this beginner’s guide to test anxiety, this test anxiety quiz, or this YouTube playlist.
- Remember that the experience is totally different if you’re seeing repeated questions. You might not consciously recognize many questions, but I 100% promise that you’ll be faster and more accurate on questions you’ve seen before – and you’re MUCH less likely to struggle with time management as a result. We can’t know whether your score was inflated by 10 points or 50 points or 100 points, but tests with repeated questions are always at least somewhat inflated – and you’ll struggle more with timing on a brand-new test than you did on a familiar one.
Benchmarks for the Week 10 quant “fake test” (item #2 on the assignment list):
- Medium quant questions: please hit 90%+ if your goal is a quant score in the 80s.
- Hard quant questions: 60% is really good at this stage. No, really: you can miss a TON of hard questions on the GMAT and be in great shape. If you’re comfortably above 60%, congratulations. But you don’t need to be above 60% to have a great chance at an 80+ on quant.
- Careless error rate: < 3%. Maaaaaaybe we can shrug off a single careless error. More than that? You’ll need to focus on getting your process right before it’s too late.
- Questions that took you 3+ minutes: < 3%. I know: it’s hard to let questions go. But keep fighting to “bail when you flail”, as our friend Mike likes to say.
Benchmarks for the optional Week 10 verbal “fake test” (item #3 on the assignment list):
- Sorry, the verbal “fake test” is FAR from ideal. But at least it gives you 23 official questions in 45 minutes. So take the benchmarks with a grain of salt.
- Medium CR questions: we’d like to see you at 90% on these if your goal is a 90th percentile score on GMAT verbal. Adjust accordingly if you’d be happy with an 80V or lower.
- Hard CR questions: 50% is good, 75%+ is AWESOME if your goal is to score in the 90th percentile. You can get beat up by the hard ones, and still be in great shape for a top verbal score. If your goals are more modest, 50% correct might be great on these.
- OG RC questions: 80% is a reasonable starting point, but it depends on exactly which questions you selected.
- CR questions that took 3+ minutes: none, please. No CR question is worth that much time. Learn to let go if you get stuck.
- Overall time management: it’s OK if it was kinda weird. The “fake test” is a clumsy approximation of an actual verbal section, so it’s fair to expect some timing oddities, within reason.
Benchmarks for the Week 10 Data Insights “fake test” (item #4 on the assignment list):
- Remember: the Data Insights “fake test” is FAR from ideal. But at least it gives you 20 official questions in 45 minutes. Just be sure to take these benchmarks with a grain of salt, since this task isn’t quite like the real thing.
- Medium questions: 80% is good, 90%+ is excellent if your goal is DI80.
- Hard questions: 50% is good, 70%+ is AWESOME if your goal is DI80+. No, really: you can miss a TON of hard questions on the GMAT and be in great shape.
- DS questions that took 3+ minutes: none, please. No DS question is worth that much time. Learn to let go if you get stuck.
- GI, TA, or TPA questions that took 3:30+ minutes: none, please. No question is worth that much time. Learn to let go if you get stuck.
- Overall time management: it’s OK if it was kinda weird. This is a clumsy approximation of an actual DI section, so it’s fair to expect some timing oddities, within reason.
What to do about your Week 10 practice test results
- If you’re close to your goal on the mba.com test, please do something nice for yourself. Have a nice meal, watch a movie, or go do something fun. Seriously, please celebrate your victories – doing so will help keep you fresh in the final month of your studies.
- If you’re a long way from your goal on the mba.com test, consider pausing the study plan. If you’re more than 20-40 points away from your goals, you might want to take a break from the practice tests, and see if you can move the needle on your weaknesses before jumping back in.
- If you’re making careless errors: As always, job #1 is to stamp them out. Check out the resource list in the study plan for help.
- If you spent 3+ minutes on too many questions: This is a question of discipline and mindset. Learn to let go! Remember: the test is designed to make you miss 20-50% of the questions, and most of you will do exactly that – even if you get a great score. So dump the perfectionism, and learn to guess and move on.
- If you struggled on “medium” questions from the mba.com question bank: I’m still not a fan of reviewing individual questions in detail, because it’s so time-consuming. But ask yourself: were these careless errors? If not: have you missed similar questions recently? If the answer is “yes”, then you might have uncovered a weakness that’s worth some attention.
- If you struggled on “hard” questions from the mba.com question bank: Hey, these are hard, and I promise that they aren’t the #1 thing holding you back from a 645 or even a 705. So don’t waste too much time on these, unless you think you missed a question out of carelessness.
- Again: don’t spend a ton of time reviewing individual questions. They can drain too much of your precious study time. If a question was particularly hard or weird, then it isn’t the biggest threat to your GMAT goals.
Benchmarks for Your Week 10 Quant Results
The first part is the same as in previous weeks:
- Count the errors that make you go "whoa, how the 🤬 did I miss THAT one?!?" No really: count them, for EVERY quant set you completed. Then divide that by the total number of questions to get your careless error rate.
If your long-term goal is to score in the 80s, here are the metrics I’d like you to hit in Week 10:
- Careless error rate: < 2%. You’ve heard this before: the careless errors need to be gone, or almost gone.
- OG & Quant Guide sets (items #1-2): 80%+ correct is great, 70-80% is good. The questions are pretty darned tough now, so don’t worry AT ALL if your accuracy rate is flat or even dropping a bit.
- Optional topic-based practice sets (#3 on the list): as always, take these with a grain of salt. The quality and difficulty will vary quite a bit on these, so don’t freak out if you miss hard, weird, or badly written questions.
- Speed: On the OG and topic-based sets, you're still in good shape if you’re reasonably close to 2 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 2:30 per question on average, it might be a sign that your skills are shaky, or that you're still not choosing efficient paths forward.
What Should You Do About Your Quant Weaknesses in Week 10?
Our usual reminder: on an adaptive test, job #1 is to be accurate on the questions that you’re capable of getting right. When the GMAT punches you in the head with harder questions, just smile and say “haha, you got me that time, GMAT!”
I’m not kidding: I want you to learn to enjoy that particular type of pain. It’s a good thing on an adaptive test like the GMAT. Just nail the questions that are in your wheelhouse, and don’t lose sleep over the crazy hard stuff – especially on quant.
- If your careless error rate is too high: that’s bad. Do whatever you need to do to fix this. Do it now. Better: do it yesterday, or a few weeks ago. Pause the study plan if you need to. Just fix the careless errors.
- If you struggled on the OG or Quant Guide sets (items #1-2): as usual, ask yourself WHY you struggled. If you’re at, say, 70% accuracy, that’s not ideal, but context matters: I don’t mind if you got beat up by hard or unusual questions. If you missed a cluster of similar questions – especially if they don’t appear to be terribly difficult – then invest time in those topics if necessary. But don’t overreact to individual questions, please.
- If you struggled on optional topic-based sets (item #3): again, concentrate on putting your errors into context, and look for broad patterns. If you made similar errors on several relatively easy questions, then you might want to revisit the quant books or videos. But if you missed hard or strange questions, who cares?
- If you got absolutely DESTROYED by ALL of the quant homework: well, that shouldn’t be happening at this stage. But if it is, please pause the study plan ASAP, before you burn through all of the remaining practice tests.
- How much time should you spend reviewing individual quant questions? Not much, please! Because it can take SOOOOOOO much time to review a question, it should be your absolute last resort. That’s why we want you to redo questions first – sometimes, you’ll see your mistake right away, and that’s the best way to learn. If you miss a question a second time, then maybe it’s a sign of an underlying issue.
- No, really: resist the temptation to obsess over individual questions. Instead, look for patterns in your errors – an error on one question might be a fluke (or a weird, hard, or badly written question), but if you miss several related questions, you have an opportunity to get a good ROI on your study time by addressing a general weakness via a video or articles or books.
Benchmarks for Your Week 10 RC & CR Results
- OG & Verbal Guide RC & CR sets: if your goal is to score in the 90th percentile on verbal, 80% correct in under 2 minutes per question is great on this week’s sets, 90% is outstanding. These are getting hard now, so it’s not necessarily a disaster if you’re under 80%, thanks to the increased difficulty.
- Accuracy on (optional) LSAT CR & RC sets: 80% accuracy is still the goal if you’re trying to hit the 90th percentile on GMAT verbal; 70% accuracy is fine if you’re happy with an 80V. If you need a check on your progress, it’s a good idea to do an LSAT set occasionally, and compare it to your Week 1 results.
- Efficiency on LSAT CR & RC sets: 60 minutes or less is your goal if you want to finish the GMAT verbal section on time.
- Consistency on LSAT CR & RC sets: your errors and times should fall within a fairly narrow range across ALL of your LSAT sets. LSAT sets (~25 Qs each) do not vary much in difficulty, so if your errors or times fluctuate wildly, that’s a sign that you’re doing very different things at different times, and that you might need to work on your approach to questions.
What Should You Do About Your CR & RC Weaknesses in Week 10?
- Look for “careless” mistakes. As with everything on the GMAT, pay close attention to anything that seems to be an “unforced error.” Did you miss a ton of questions that felt easy to you, especially in the OG and Verbal Guide? If so, you might want to revisit the techniques in the videos and articles in the assignment lists. This is MUCH more important than getting better at harder questions.
- If your results are significantly better on RC than on CR: you might want to invest time in some extra CR sets or videos... and you’ll want to do so ASAP, because time is getting short. Pause the study plan if you need to.
- If you’re better at CR than RC: same as above. If you haven’t already addressed this, it’s probably time to do so. Pause the study plan if you need to.
- If you’re slow ( > 60 mins per LSAT set, > 2 minutes per OG or Verbal Guide question): by now, you should have standardized your approach to RC and CR questions; if you haven’t, then you need to do so ASAP. If your process is spot-on already, maybe you’re slow because of “non-academic” issues: fatigue, distraction, anxiety, the time of day that you’re doing sets, barking dogs outside your window, low blood sugar, a lack of sleep, or a lack of intensity. It’s also possible that you’re a slow reader, and that’s always a hard thing to fix. I wish I could tell you which of these things is happening – but you’ll have to figure that part out for yourself, unfortunately... and you’ll need to do so ASAP. Again, pause the study plan if you need to.
- If you’re getting CRUSHED on CR & RC: well, I’m very impressed that you’re still reading this in Week 10, but time is running out, and it’s probably time to either pause the study plan, or adjust your goals on verbal. If you’re getting demolished, you’ll definitely want to check out this video about the factors that can lead to GMAT verbal struggles – it references a previous version of the GMAT, but the punchlines still hold.
Benchmarks for Your Week 10 Data Insights Results
Before you do anything else:
- Count the errors that make you go "whoa, how the 🤬 did I miss THAT one?!?" No really: count them, for EVERY set you completed. Then divide that by the total number of questions to get your careless error rate.
If your long-term goal is to score in the 80s, here are the metrics I’d like you to hit in Week 10:
- Careless error rate: < 2%. You’ve heard this before: the careless errors need to be gone, or almost gone.
- Official DS set (#2 on the list): these are getting harder as you move through the books, so I’d be really happy with 80% accuracy here. As always, context matters: if you struggled with a few weird questions, that’s not a big deal.
- Mixed mba.com sets (GI, TA, TPA, MSR – #3-4 on the list): Now that you’re mixing easy, medium, and hard questions (and possibly running low on the easier ones), it’s harder to provide a one-size-fits-all benchmark. On easy questions, we’d like to see perfection, or something close to it; 80% on the medium questions and 50% on the hard questions is really good. If you’re beating those numbers already, you definitely deserve a cookie.
- MSR set from the Online Practice Questions (#5 on the list): This set is brief and random, so I don’t think it makes sense to pin you to a benchmark. Just ask yourself this: are you getting more comfortable spotting the right information, without getting bogged down in the things you don’t need? Are you generally doing well on the easy and medium questions? If so, you’re on track.
- Randomized batches of forum questions (#6 on the list): 85-90% correct is good on the sub-555 questions, but if you did mixed difficulty sets, you’ll have to take the results with a grain of salt – especially since non-official GI, TA, and TPA questions vary enormously in quality. If you happened to see nasty, strange questions, 50-60% might be pretty good. Don’t overreact if the percentage wasn’t great, though.
- Speed for Data Sufficiency: On the OG and topic-based sets, you're in good shape if you’re reasonably close to 2 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 2:30 per question on average, it might be a sign that your basic skills are rusty, or that you're not choosing efficient paths forward. If this is still a problem, you might want to consider honing your DS technique, maybe with some help from the videos that appear in the resources lists.
- Speed for Multi-Source Reasoning: On DI, you’ll have an average of 2:15 per question. It’s OK if you’re a bit slower on MSR on test day, but you don’t want to be TOO much slower. So in the long run, you’ll want to average somewhere around 7-9 minutes per set of 3 MSR questions. Of course, you may or may not see 3 questions per MSR “tab set” on mba.com practice sets, so adjust your expectations accordingly – something like 3-5 minutes on the first question is probably OK, and ideally 2 minutes per less on any subsequent questions. If you’re close to these speeds right now, that’s great.
- Speed for GI, TA, & TPA questions: You're in good shape if you’re close to 2:30 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 3:00 minutes per question on average, it might be a sign that your basic skills are rusty, or that you're not choosing efficient paths forward. If that’s still a problem, you might consider spending some extra time with the videos in the resources list to see if those help at all.
What Should You Do About Your Data Insights Weaknesses in Week 10?
Our usual reminder: on an adaptive test, job #1 is to be spectacularly accurate on the questions that you’re capable of getting right. If you’re taking care of business on the easier ones, you’ll get pounded by harder questions – and you’ll miss plenty of them. Embrace the pain.
In other words: don’t obsess over the hard stuff. It isn’t worth much of your precious time.
Here’s what to do once you’ve analyzed your results:
- If your careless error rate is too high: address this problem ASAP. Nothing else matters until you do. Do whatever you need to do to fix this. Do it now. Check out the resource list in the study plan for help.
- If you struggled with a specific DI question type: whatever you need is probably in this playlist.
- If you struggled on a specific quant-based topic: don’t panic. It’s far too easy to overreact to a few errors, and study these problems until your eyeballs burst. Instead, try to put your struggles in context: did you miss particularly hard or strange versions of these questions? Were your errors careless? If so, you probably don’t need to do much studying, exactly. But if you missed basic questions because your foundations are shaky, then you might need to do some remedial studying, and it might even make sense to “pause” the study plan to do so – but don’t assume that you need to do this unless the data is very, very clear about your weaknesses.
- If you struggled on the OG or Data Insights Guide sets: As usual, ask yourself WHY you struggled. If you’re at, say, 70% accuracy, that doesn’t sound ideal right now, and careless errors need to be fixed immediately. But if you got a bunch of weird, hard, or obscure questions, then maybe 70% is totally fine.
- If you got CRUSHED by ALL of the homework: if you’re nowhere close to the benchmarks on Data Insights – and if your long-term goal is a score in the 80s – then maybe you need to back away from the study plan, and invest some time in rebuilding your basic skills. If that’s the case for you, tag us in the thread, give us as much detail as you can about your situation, and we’ll try to help.
- How much time should you spend reviewing individual questions? Not much, please! Because it can take SOOOOOOO much time to review a question, it should be your absolute last resort. That’s why we want you to redo questions first – sometimes, you’ll see your mistake right away, and that’s the best way to learn. If you miss a question a second time, then maybe it’s a sign of an underlying issue.
- No, really: resist the temptation to obsess over individual questions. Instead, look for patterns in your errors – an error on one question might be a fluke (or a weird, hard, or badly written question), but if you miss several related questions, you have an opportunity to get a good ROI on your study time by addressing a general weakness via a video or articles or books.