How to Interpret Your Week 11 Homework Results
Please read this section if you’re serious about optimizing your study time. At this point, you’re deliciously close to the end, and your practice tests are doing most of the talking. Are you already hitting your target score, or are you within a few points of your goals? If so, great: you probably don’t need much help interpreting your results.
But if you’re struggling a bit, please read through this post. Hopefully something here will help you make the right moves in the final weeks.
As always, if you’re worried about something that isn’t addressed in this thread, please post your questions/worries/doubts either here or in the
Week 1 thread.
How to interpret your results on mba.com test #4
Benchmarks for Your Week 11 Quant Results
The first part is the same as in previous weeks:
- Count the errors that make you go "whoa, how the 🤬 did I miss THAT one?!?" No really: count them, for EVERY quant set you completed. Then divide that by the total number of questions to get your careless error rate.
If your long-term goal is to score in the 80s, here are the metrics I’d like you to hit in Week 11:- Careless error rate: < 2%. You’ve heard this before: the careless errors need to be gone, or almost gone.
- OG & Quant Guide sets (items #1-2): 80%+ correct is great, 70-80% is good. The questions are tough now, so don’t worry AT ALL if your accuracy rate is flat or even dropping a bit.
- Optional topic-based practice sets (item #3): as always, take these with a grain of salt. The quality and difficulty will vary quite a bit on these, so don’t freak out if you miss hard, weird, or badly written questions.
- Speed: On the OG and topic-based sets, you're still in good shape if you’re reasonably close to 2 minutes per question. If you're much slower than, say, 2:30 per question on average, it might be a sign that your skills are shaky, or that you're still not choosing efficient paths forward.
What Should You Do About Your Quant Weaknesses in Week 11?
Our usual reminder: on an adaptive test, job #1 is to be accurate on the questions that you’re capable of getting right. When the GMAT punches you in the head with harder questions, just smile and say “haha, you got me that time, GMAT!” No, really: please learn to enjoy that particular type of pain. Smile when you see impossibly hard questions on an adaptive test like the GMAT. Just nail the questions that are in your wheelhouse, and don’t lose sleep over the crazy hard stuff – especially on quant.- If your careless error rate is too high: that’s bad. Do whatever you need to do to fix this. Do it now. Better: do it yesterday, or a few weeks ago. Pause the study plan if you need to. Just fix the careless errors.
- If you struggled on the OG or Quant Guide sets (items #1-2): as usual, ask yourself WHY you struggled. If you’re at, say, 70% accuracy, that’s not ideal, but context matters: I really don’t mind if you got beat up by hard or unusual questions. If you missed a cluster of similar questions – especially if they don’t appear to be terribly difficult – then invest time in those topics if necessary. But don’t overreact to individual questions, please.
- If you struggled on optional topic-based sets (item #3): again, concentrate on putting your errors into context, and look for broad patterns. If you made similar errors on several relatively easy questions, then you might want to revisit the quant books or videos. But if you missed hard or strange questions, who cares?
- If you got absolutely DESTROYED by ALL of the quant homework: well, that shouldn’t be happening at this stage. But if it is, please pause the study plan ASAP, before you burn through all of the remaining practice tests.
- How much time should you spend reviewing individual quant questions? Not much, please! Because it can take SOOOOOOO much time to review a question, it should be your absolute last resort. That’s why we want you to redo questions first – sometimes, you’ll see your mistake right away, and that’s the best way to learn. If you miss a question a second time, then maybe it’s a sign of an underlying issue.
- No, really: resist the temptation to obsess over individual questions. Instead, look for patterns in your errors – an error on one question might be a fluke (or a weird, hard, or badly written question), but if you miss several related questions, you have an opportunity to get a good ROI on your study time by addressing a general weakness via a video or articles or books.
Benchmarks for Your Week 11 RC & CR Results
- OG & Verbal Guide RC & CR sets: if your goal is a 90th percentile verbal score, 80% correct in 2 minutes per question is great, 90% is outstanding. (Adjust accordingly if your goals are more modest.) These are getting hard now, so it’s not necessarily a disaster if you’re under 80%, thanks to the increased difficulty. And these should probably hurt your brain a bit. Or more than a bit. Embrace the pain, friends.
- Accuracy on (optional) LSAT CR & RC sets: 80% accuracy is still the goal if you’re trying to hit the 90th percentile on GMAT verbal; 70% accuracy is fine if you’re happy with an 80V. If you need a check on your progress, it’s a good idea to do an LSAT set occasionally, and compare it to your Week 1 results.
- Efficiency on LSAT CR & RC sets: 60 minutes or less is your goal if you want to finish the GMAT verbal section on time.
- Consistency on LSAT CR & RC sets: your errors and times should fall within a fairly narrow range across ALL of your LSAT sets. LSAT sets (~25 Qs each) do not vary much in difficulty, so if your errors or times fluctuate wildly, that’s a sign that you’re doing very different things at different times, and you might need to work on your approach to questions.
What Should You Do About Your CR & RC Weaknesses in Week 11?
- Look for “careless” errors. As with everything on the GMAT, pay close attention to anything that seems to be an “unforced error.” Did you miss a ton of questions that felt easy to you, especially in the OG and Verbal Guide? If so, you might want to revisit the techniques in the videos and articles in the assignment lists. This is MUCH more important than getting better at harder questions.
- If your results are significantly better on RC than on CR: you might want to invest time in some extra CR sets or videos... and you might want to do so ASAP, because time is getting short. Pause the study plan if you need to.
- If you’re better at CR than RC: same as above. If you haven’t already addressed this, it’s probably past time to do so. Pause the study plan if you need to.
- If you’re slow ( > 60 mins per LSAT set, > 2 minutes per OG or Verbal Guide question): by now, you should have standardized your approach to RC and CR questions; if you haven’t, then you probably need to do so ASAP. If your process is spot-on already, maybe you’re slow because of “non-academic” issues: fatigue, distraction, anxiety, the time of day that you’re doing sets, barking dogs outside your window, low blood sugar, a lack of sleep, or a lack of intensity. It’s also possible that you’re a slow reader, and that’s always a hard thing to fix. I wish I could tell you which of these things is happening – but you’ll have to figure that part out for yourself, unfortunately... and you’ll need to do so ASAP. Again, pause the study plan if you need to.
- If you’re getting impatient with your results: If you’re hitting our benchmarks, you’re doing GREAT, and you’re ready to get something close to an 84V. If you’re not quite hitting the CR/RC benchmarks yet, are you at least seeing some improvement? If so, keep at it! If your results have plateaued – and you’re not happy with those results – then it might be time to pause the study plan and invest some time in figuring out what, exactly, is going wrong.
- If you’re getting CRUSHED on CR & RC: well, I’m very impressed that you’re still reading this in Week 11, but time is running out, and it’s probably time to either pause the study plan, or adjust your goals on verbal. If you’re getting demolished, you’ll definitely want to check out this video about the factors that can lead to GMAT verbal struggles – it references a previous version of the GMAT, but the punchlines still hold.
Benchmarks for Your Week 11 Data Insights Results
Before you do anything else:
- Count the errors that make you go "whoa, how the 🤬 did I miss THAT one?!?" No really: count them, for EVERY set you completed. Then divide that by the total number of questions to get your careless error rate.
If your long-term goal is to score in the 80s, here are the metrics I’d like you to hit in Week 11:Careless error rate: < 2%. You’ve heard this before: the careless errors need to be gone, or almost gone. Official DS set (#1 on the list): these are getting harder as you move through the books, so I’d be pretty thrilled with 80% accuracy here. As always, context matters: if you struggled with a few weird questions, that’s not a big deal.Mixed mba.com sets (GI, TA, TPA, MSR – #2-3 on the list): Now that you’re mixing easy, medium, and hard questions – and probably seeing more of the hardest ones – it’s trickier to provide a one-size-fits-all benchmark. On easy questions, we’d like to see perfection, or something close to it; 80% on the medium questions and 50% on the hard questions is really good. If you’re beating those numbers, you’re on track.MSR set from the Online Practice Questions (#4 on the list): This set is brief and random, so I don’t think it makes sense to pin you to a benchmark. Just ask yourself this: are you getting more comfortable spotting the right information, without getting bogged down in the things you don’t need? Are you generally doing well on the easy and medium questions? If so, you’re on track. Randomized batches of forum questions (#5 on the list): 85-90% correct is good on the sub-555 questions, but if you did mixed difficulty sets, you’ll have to take the results with a grain of salt – especially since non-official GI, TA, and TPA questions vary enormously in quality. If you happened to see nasty, strange questions, 50-60% might be pretty good. Don’t overreact if the percentage wasn’t great, though.Speed for Data Sufficiency: On the OG and topic-based sets, you're in good shape if you’re reasonably close to 2 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 2:30 per question on average, it might be a sign that your basic skills are rusty, or that you're not choosing efficient paths forward. If this is still a problem, you might want to consider honing your DS technique, maybe with some help from the videos that appear in the resources lists.Speed for Multi-Source Reasoning: On DI, you’ll have an average of 2:15 per question. It’s OK if you’re a bit slower on MSR on test day, but you don’t want to be TOO much slower. So in the long run, you’ll want to average somewhere around 7-9 minutes per set of 3 MSR questions. Of course, you may or may not see 3 questions per MSR “tab set” on mba.com practice sets, so adjust your expectations accordingly – something like 3-5 minutes on the first question is probably OK, and ideally 2 minutes per less on any subsequent questions. If you’re close to these speeds right now, that’s great.Speed for GI, TA, & TPA questions: You're in good shape if you’re close to 2:30 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 3:00 minutes per question on average, it might be a sign that your basic skills are rusty, or that you're not choosing efficient paths forward. If that’s still a problem, you might consider spending some extra time with the videos in the resources list to see if those help at all.What Should You Do About Your Data Insights Weaknesses in Week 11?
Our usual reminder: on an adaptive test, job #1 is to be spectacularly accurate on the questions that you’re capable of getting right. If you’re taking care of business on the easier ones, you’ll get pounded by harder questions – and you’ll miss plenty of them. Embrace the pain.
In other words: don’t obsess over the hard stuff. It isn’t worth much of your precious time.
Here’s what to do once you’ve analyzed your results:
- If your careless error rate is too high: address this problem ASAP. Nothing else matters until you do. Do whatever you need to do to fix this. Do it now. Check out the resource list in the study plan for help.
- If you struggled with a specific DI question type: whatever you need is probably in this playlist.
- If you struggled on a specific quant-based topic: don’t panic. It’s far too easy to overreact to a few errors, and study these problems until your eyeballs burst. Instead, try to put your struggles in context: did you miss particularly hard or strange versions of these questions? Were your errors careless? If so, you probably don’t need to do much studying, exactly. But if you missed basic questions because your foundations are shaky, then you might need to do some remedial studying, and it might even make sense to “pause” the study plan to do so – but don’t assume that you need to do this unless the data is very, very clear about your weaknesses.
- If you struggled on the OG or Data Insights Guide sets: As usual, ask yourself WHY you struggled. If you’re at, say, 70% accuracy, that doesn’t sound ideal right now, and careless errors need to be fixed immediately. But if you got a bunch of weird, hard, or obscure questions, then maybe 70% is totally fine.
- If you got CRUSHED by ALL of the homework: Well, if it’s just because the questions are getting super-hard, that’s cool. If you’re getting crushed by easy ones, that’s not cool – and it’s probably time to pause the study plan before you waste the final practice tests.
- How much time should you spend reviewing individual questions? Not much, please! Because it can take SOOOOOOO much time to review a question, it should be your absolute last resort. That’s why we want you to redo questions first – sometimes, you’ll see your mistake right away, and that’s the best way to learn. If you miss a question a second time, then maybe it’s a sign of an underlying issue.
- No, really: resist the temptation to obsess over individual questions. Instead, look for patterns in your errors – an error on one question might be a fluke (or a weird, hard, or badly written question), but if you miss several related questions, you have an opportunity to get a good ROI on your study time by addressing a general weakness via a video or articles or books.