GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Aug 2019, 08:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57022
Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2018, 03:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

40% (01:56) correct 60% (01:54) wrong based on 143 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character traits by examining people’s handwriting. For example, a strong cross on the “t” is supposed to denote enthusiasm. Obviously, however, with practice and perseverance people can alter their handwriting to include this feature. So it seems that graphologists must hold that permanent character traits can be changed.

The argument against graphology proceeds by


(A) citing apparently incontestable evidence that leads to absurd consequences when conjoined with the view in question

(B) demonstrating that an apparently controversial and interesting claim is really just a platitude

(C) arguing that a particular technique of analysis can never be effective when the people analyzed know that it is being used

(D) showing that proponents of the view have no theoretical justification for the view

(E) attacking a technique by arguing that what the technique is supposed to detect can be detected quite readily without it

_________________
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1258
Re: Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2018, 03:59
Bunuel wrote:
Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character traits by examining people’s handwriting. For example, a strong cross on the “t” is supposed to denote enthusiasm. Obviously, however, with practice and perseverance people can alter their handwriting to include this feature. So it seems that graphologists must hold that permanent character traits can be changed.

The argument against graphology proceeds by


(A) citing apparently incontestable evidence that leads to absurd consequences when conjoined with the view in question

(B) demonstrating that an apparently controversial and interesting claim is really just a platitude

(C) arguing that a particular technique of analysis can never be effective when the people analyzed know that it is being used

(D) showing that proponents of the view have no theoretical justification for the view

(E) attacking a technique by arguing that what the technique is supposed to detect can be detected quite readily without it




If graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character traits by examining people’s handwriting, and on the other hand with practice and perseverance people can alter their handwriting to include this feature. these two things contradict each other and look like absurd :lol:

Hence this makes me believe that correct answer choice is A
:-)
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 551
Location: France
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2018, 19:58
Can someone explain in detail the OA?

Posted from my mobile device
_________________
Everything will fall into place…

There is perfect timing for
everything and everyone.
Never doubt, But Work on
improving yourself,
Keep the faith and
Stay ready. When it’s
finally your turn,
It will all make sense.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1258
Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2018, 07:20
2
Harshgmat wrote:
Can someone explain in detail the OA?

Posted from my mobile device



Harshgmat say someone tells you - " by your handwriting I can determine you character" :)

And your reaction is like this " what ? :shocked, Are you serious? are you gmat student or what? its total nonsence i dont beleive you :lol: " .

That person says: "why man ? :-) proove it :)"

So your asnwer: " you know what i know a person who changed his handwriting through practice and perseverance and included this feature i.e. a strong cross on the “t” which is supposed to denote enthusiasm :)

that means an individual persistent and patient, yet not enthusiastic, can put a strong cross on the “t"

hence, incontestable evidence that leads to absurd consequences when conjoined with the view in question ! :-)
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 551
Location: France
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2018, 07:50
Thanks dave13.

Why choice c) is wrong?

Posted from my mobile device
_________________
Everything will fall into place…

There is perfect timing for
everything and everyone.
Never doubt, But Work on
improving yourself,
Keep the faith and
Stay ready. When it’s
finally your turn,
It will all make sense.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1258
Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2018, 08:07
3
Harshgmat wrote:
Thanks dave13.

Why choice c) is wrong?

Posted from my mobile device



Harshgmat

C is too extreme. it mentions word "NEVER", which you cant be sure of. it is nowhere mentioned NEVER hence we dont know.

(C) arguing that a particular technique of analysis can never be effective when the people analyzed know that it is being used
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5179
Re: Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2019, 02:47
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character   [#permalink] 11 Aug 2019, 02:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne