Apeksha2101
Please guys, option D is incorrect but for some other reason and not because the use of 'were'. The use of were is correct here, since The Oneida is a community. Just like we use: The French are good people. Here we are describing a community, which is plural.
PTD1995
I don't understand the issue of the Subject-Verb of answer
D. Why is that Oneida is singular and not plural?
From my understanding of the text, Oneida are a faction and not a single person, therefore should be plural.
In my head, the reasoning goes: "The Portuguese are; The English are; The Oneida are;". Could someone explain what is wrong with my reasoning? I still agree with answer C though
Sorry that I'm late to the party here! In case it helps anybody: the key is the "out of the five nations" part. From the context, we know that we're talking about five different
nations and that "the Oneida" must represent ONE of those five nations.
We'd use "were" and "ones" if more than one of those nations sided with the colonists (e.g. "The Oneida and the Mohawks WERE the only ONES...". But since only one nation sided with the colonists, "were" isn't appropriate.
Also, if we were referring to "the Oneida" as a community/collection of people, then why use "
in siding" instead of "who sided"? "The Oneida were alone in siding with the colonists" might work, but the prepositional phrase "in siding" doesn't make much sense as written in (D).
(C) gives us: "The Oneida alone {...} sided with the colonists". This is a much simpler and clearer construction, and that makes (C) a better choice.
I hope that helps a bit!