Quote:
Helen: It was wrong of my brother Mark to tell our mother that the reason he had missed her birthday party the evening before was that he had been in a traffic accident and that by the time he was released from the hospital emergency room the party was long over. Saying something that is false can never be other than morally wrong, and there had been no such accident—Mark had simply forgotten all about the party.
The main conclusion drawn in Helen’s argument is that
(A) Mark did not tell his mother the truth
(B) the real reason Mark missed his mother’s birthday party was that he had forgotten all about it
(C) it is wrong to attempt to avoid blame for one’s failure to do something by claiming that one was prevented from doing that thing by events outside one’s control
(D) it was wrong of Mark to tell his mother that he had missed her birthday party as a result of having been in a traffic accident
(E) it is always wrong not to tell the truth
Let us deploy
IMS's four-step technique to answer this question.
STEP #1 ->
IDENTIFY THE QUESTION TYPE BY READING THE QUESTION STEMThe question stem states, 'The main conclusion drawn in Helen’s argument is that'. Clearly, we are to identify the main conclusion in the stated argument. This is not the standard conclusion question although we might still want to call it a 'conclusion' question type. Note that you are to find the conclusion IN the argument and not FROM it!
Now that we know what the question type is, let us proceed to the second step.
STEP #2 ->
PERFORM THE 'WHY TEST'Since we are dealing with an unusual conclusion question, let us figure out the conclusion and the basis on which the conclusion is arrived at. We may subject each sentence to what is called the 'WHY TEST'. As per this test, the sentence that can give an answer to 'why so?' in the very same argument becomes the conclusion.
SENTENCE 1 -> It was wrong of my brother Mark to tell our mother that the reason he had missed her birthday party the evening before was that he had been in a traffic accident and that by the time he was released from the hospital emergency room the party was long over.
(WHY WAS IT WRONG OF MY BROTHER TO DO SO?SENTENCE 2 -> Because saying something that is false can never be other than morally wrong, and there had been no such accident—Mark had simply forgotten all about the party!
Note that second sentence is used to back what is stated in the first sentence and not the other way round. Therefore, sentence 1 has to be the conclusion.
STEP #3 -> FRAME A SHADOW ANSWERWe know that the right answer should be the main conclusion drawn in Helen's argument. Therefore, the information contained in sentence 1 alone should form part of the correct answer.
SHADOW ANSWER: It was wrong of my brother Mark to have lied to our mother.
STEP #4 ->
ELIMINATE INCORRECT ANSWER OPTIONSAnswer options that do not match the shadow answer can be eliminated.
(A) Mark did not tell his mother the truth -
NOT A MATCH -
Well, we do know he lied, but the main conclusion is that it was wrong on his part to have lied. -
ELIMINATE(B) the real reason Mark missed his mother’s birthday party was that he had forgotten all about it -
NOT A MATCH -
Part of the premise, not conclusion. -
ELIMINATE(C) it is wrong to attempt to avoid blame for one’s failure to do something by claiming that one was prevented from doing that thing by events outside one’s control -
NOT A MATCH -
A very creative answer option indeed! It is not validated by the argument nonetheless. Easy to eliminate! -
ELIMINATE(D) it was wrong of Mark to tell his mother that he had missed her birthday party as a result of having been in a traffic accident -
MATCHES THE SHADOW ANSWER -
Mark's stating that he had missed their mother's birthday party as a result of having been in a traffic accident was a lie, and Helen concludes that it was wrong of him to do so. -
KEEP(E) it is always wrong not to tell the truth -
NOT A MATCH - Part of the premise, not conclusion. -
ELIMINATEHence, D is the correct answer.