Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
1. The band U2 WAS just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but less than ten years later, U2 HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
Why not use here the Present Perfect in place of the Past Perfect?:
2. The band U2 WAS just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but less than ten years later, U2 HAS fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
The only difference between these two sentences is the usage of Past Perfect (1) and Present Perfect (2). Could someone clarify this difference, please? My first two questions in mind are: 1. In the first sentence, does the "HAD ECLIPSED" inform that the effect of this event is not true today? 2. Does the usage of the Past Perfect in (1) follow from the general rule: Simple Past + Past Perfect, Simple Present + Present Perfect, and thus is semantically (not gramatically) indifferent? 3. If not, what is the semantical difference between these sentences?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Do not bring your general knowledge while interpreting the meaning. Nothing mentions that U2 is still popular and still performs. Replace U2 with a band that no longer performs, such as Beatles and you'd understand what I mean.
The band Beatles WAS just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but less than ten years later, Beatles HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
Now, Read the following sentence too - this sentence means the effect is still ON:
The band U2 WAS just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but in less than twenty years since then, U2 HAS fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
Do not bring your general knowledge while interpreting the meaning. Nothing mentions that U2 is still popular and still performs. Replace U2 with a band that no longer performs, such as Beatles and you'd understand what I mean.
The band Beatles WAS just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but less than ten years later, Beatles HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
Now, Read the following sentence too - this sentence means the effect is still ON:
The band U2 WAS just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but in less than twenty years since then, U2 HAS fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
Show more
Agreed with the reasoning;however,can you justify the time sequence used in above example.
Earlier event : Simple Past (WAS) Later event : Past Perfect (Had Eclipsed)
On the contrary, when the idea in general is reverse of above.
Right: The band U2 WAS just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but less than ten years later, U2 HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
Here, the author's point of view is from a time that is later than time event of 'HAD eclipsed'
Early 80's -------------------> 10 yrs later = early 90's ----------------------->late nineties till -----------------------> NOW new groups = was ---------> had eclipsed ------------------------------------>authors view = implied----------------> NA
1. the band U2 was and U2 had fully eclipsed are not the ones linked by simple and perfect tenses. 2. ten years later and the eclipsing that had happened in this time are.
Realizing 1 is important.
I hope that makes you understand this.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.