Herons must eat large numbers of fish to survive. Therefore, according to naturalists, when many herons nest near each other in a marsh, large numbers of fish must be available to them. But many herons successfully nest in the Pahargaon marsh, and that marsh has been nearly empty of fish for many years.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to reconcile the apparent discrepancy described above?
(A) Pesticides used on nearby farms have seeped into the waters of the Pahargaon marsh and killed most of the fish. - WRONG. 2nd aspect taken care of.
(B) The Pahargaon marsh has been growing saltier over the years, killing off much of the vegetation that the fish needed to eat. - WRONG. Takes into account of 2nd aspects than first.
(C) The herons in the Pahargaon marsh have been successfully raising unusually large families, with an average of almost two offspring surviving from each nesting. - WRONG. Creates more confusion than providing solution.
(D) Herons nesting in the Pahargaon marsh normally feed on fish living in nearby marshes. - CORRECT. Even though Pahargaon has less fish population Herons survive as they feed in nearby marshes.
(E) The large heron population in the Pahargaon marsh placed so great a strain on the fish population that the number of fish declined dramatically. - WRONG. Like A and B only.
Two aspects that define the passage are:
1. Herons successfully surviving in Pahargaon marsh
2. Pahargaon marsh being nearly empty of fish for many years
The conclusion is about Herons surviving successfully in Pahargaon marsh and not why the fish population is not enough for Herons' survival.
Answer D.