It is currently 22 Mar 2018, 18:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2008
Posts: 293
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2008, 06:49
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 12 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600’s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages overwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a village’s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen.
In the historian’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first supplies a context for the historian’s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.
B. The first presents evidence to support the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against that position.
C. The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.
D. The first is a position for which the historian argues; the second is an assumption that serves as the basis of that argument.
E. The first is an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; the second acknowledges a consideration that calls that assumption into question

Couldn't connect to it...

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Manager
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 169

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2008, 12:26
A. The first supplies a context for the historian’s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.
First is correct here but the second is wrong as the historian against the position he seeks to establish.
B. The first presents evidence to support the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against that position.
The author is not arguing against any position here secondly the second statements is not against the first one.
C. The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.
IMO this is the correct answer.
D. The first is a position for which the historian argues; the second is an assumption that serves as the basis of that argument.
First is not a position but a fact or a premise.
E. The first is an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; the second acknowledges a consideration that calls that assumption into question
The first is not an assumption but a fact or a premise and second is a conclusion
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 280

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2008, 15:56
i think Its E
Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Posts: 5

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2008, 19:49
Its C

Ist - A perspective
2nd - A conclusive argument

very clear
Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 513
Schools: Wharton

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2008, 05:17
vivektripathi wrote:
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600’s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages overwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a village’s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen.
In the historian’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first supplies a context for the historian’s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.
B. The first presents evidence to support the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against that position.
C. The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.
D. The first is a position for which the historian argues; the second is an assumption that serves as the basis of that argument.
E. The first is an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; the second acknowledges a consideration that calls that assumption into question

Couldn't connect to it...

"Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen" is the conclusion of the passage.

Only possible choice is C
Intern
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Posts: 29

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2008, 21:21
manager - I think you have assumed that Complete record also means accurate. (1) only mentions that historians have found to records and there are no missing data. If it said it was accurate, (2) will go against and then E is correct.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Re: CR -Historian   [#permalink] 19 Aug 2008, 21:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.